Strict Liability Flashcards

1
Q

What are the categories of tort strict liability ?

A
  1. Abnormally dangerous activities
  2. Wild Animals
  3. Defective Products
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In strict liability, when is the defendant liable?

A

D is liable for injuring P whether or not he exercised due care

  • Imposes liability regardless of defendant’s fault
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the wild animal rule?

A

If D keeps a wild animal & P is injured

  • Owner is SL despite his precautions to prevent harm
  • If harm arises from a dangerous propensity charachteristc of the animal OR
  • of which the owner has reason to know
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the domestic pet rule?

A

Owner SL for injuries if he knows or has reason to know of a dangerous propensity & harm results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the rule for trespassing domestic animals ?

A

Owner SL for reas. fores. damage caused

  • if owner knows or has reason to know the pet is intruding on another’s land in a way that has a tendancy to cause subst. harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When is an activity abnormally dangerous?

A

When an activity:

  1. Creates a foreseeable and highly significant risk of physical harm even when reasonable care is exercised, AND
  2. The activity is not commonly engaged in
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Whay are common abnormally dangerous activities?

A
  1. Blasting with dynamite
  2. crop dusting
  3. Transporting toxic waste
  4. Fumigating
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Abnormally dangerous activities rule

A

A defendant engaged in an abnorm. dang. act. is held to SL

  • w/out any proof of negligence
  • for personal injuries & prop. damage
  • Caused by the activity
  • regardless of precautions taken to prevent harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the scope of the risk of abnormally dangerous activities ?

A

The harm that actually occurs results from the risk that made the activity abnormally dangerous in the first place

  • D’s liab. can be cut off by unfores. intervening causes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the elements of Strict Liability?

A
  1. Absolute duty to make P’s pers. or prop. safe
  2. Breach
  3. Actual & Proximate Causation
  4. Damages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Wild Animals - Plaintiff’s Fearful Reaction

A

Owner SL for injuries caused by P’s fearful reaction to the sight of an unrestrained wild animal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Wild Animals - Liability to trespassers

A

Landowner is NOT SL for injuries

  • Exception - Vicious Watchdog
  • NOTE - May be liable on negligence theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dog Bite Statutes

A

Hold owners of dogs or other domestic animals designated in statute SL for damages resulting from personal injuries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the effect if a domestic animal strays onto a pub. road & contributes to an accident?

A

General Negligence standard applies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the defenses to Strict Liability ?

A
  1. Assumption of the Risk bars recovery
  2. Statutory Privilege - No SL for D performing essential pub. services

Contibutory Negligence - NOT a defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

If a defendant’s wild animal wanders onto another’s property, what’s the liability to the defendant?

A

They are strictly liable for trespass

17
Q

When will assumption of the risk of animal attacks be a defense for a defendant?

A

When the vic. does something vol. to cause the animal to injure him

18
Q

When will strict liability apply to lateral support removed from improved land?

A

Only when the land would have colapsed in its nat’l state

  • If the improvements caused the land to collapse, then P must prove negligence