Stereotypes Flashcards

1
Q

Social categorisation

A

The process of assigning people to groups based on social categories such as age, sex, race etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why do we categorise thing in a social context?

A

It simplifies an otherwise complex world to a level we can deal with
Social categories are more informative for person perception (Stangor et al. 1992)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Rosch (1978)

A

We think of categories having ‘fuzzy’ boundaries and revolving around a central prototype

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the most typical features of a category?

A

Cognitive representations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fiske & Neuberg (2000)

A

Because we categorise so much on the basis of salient social categories, this should become automatic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Allport (1954)

A

“The human mind must think with the aid of categories, once formed, categories are the basis for normal prejudgement. We cannot possibly avoid this process. Orderly living depends on it”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Argument against automatic categorisation

A

Mere exposure isn’t enough to initiate categorisation
If social categorisation simplifies our social world, then we shouldn’t do it when it isn’t needed/relevant - categorisation may be goal-dependent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Quinn & Macrae (2005)

A

People only categorised faces by gender when instructed to, people just looking at the faces did not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Stereotype definition Lippmann (1922)

A

A picture inside one’s head that helps us navigate person perception and justify social hierarchies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Modern definition of stereotypes

A

The collection of traits that society associates with a particular social group (Brown, 1995)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Difference between categorisation and stereotyping

A

Categorisation is merely putting people into groups, stereotyping is assigning certain traits depending on that group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is prejudice?

A

A negative attitude held towards a social group or its members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is discrimination?

A

Biased behaviour towards a person due to their group membership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Tripartite model of prejudice

A

Stereotypes (cognitive), discrimination (behavioural) + emotions (affective) are the 3 components of prejudice (attitude)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Princeton Trilogy Studies

A

Tracked stereotype change in Princeton students over 70 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Katz and Braly (1993) —> Madon et al (2001)

A

Most ethnicity and nationality based stereotypes have changed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The Stereotype Content Model

A

Fiske, Cuddy, Glick and Xu (2002)
Stereotypes classified along two key dimensions of warmth and competence, linked to current status and potential for competition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Stereotype activation

A

The degree to which a stereotype is accessible in the mind (Kunda & Spencer, 2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Stereotype application

A

The actual use of activated stereotypes in judgements (forming an impression) (Kunda & Spencer, 2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Why do people stereotype?

A

To save energy

To justify social hierarchies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Judgemental heuristics

A

A mental shortcut for streamlining social perception (Bodenhausen & Wyer, 1985)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Gilbert and Hixon (1991)

A

Stereotypes are tools that jump out of the toolbox when there is a job to be done

23
Q

Macrae, Milne & Bodenvasen (1994)

A

Participants were more easily able to remember an audio track of prose when primed with stereotype information, compared with a control condition where the stereotype was not present

24
Q

System Justification Theory

A

Jost & Banaji (1994)
People want to believe that social systems are fair and legitimate
Stereotypes can rationalise any inequality that exists

25
Q

Jost & Kay (2005)

A

Participants were exposed to communal gender stereotypes (do these traits apply more to women or men and to what degree?)
Participants then completed a questionnaire assessing agreement with current gender relations and sex role division
Exposure to stereotypes increased women’s gender-specific system justification and reduced it for the male participants

26
Q

Stereotypes are formed through ____

A

Socialisation

27
Q

What helps to perpetuate stereotypes?

A

Biases in exposure/interpretation

Self-fulfilling prophecy

28
Q

Biased exposure

A

Stereotypes may bias the information we seek, in a way that confirms the stereotype

29
Q

Evidence for biased exposure

A

Johnston & Macrae (1994)
Impression formation task - participants were given a selection of questions/answers from interviews of physics students
Participants chose to view more stereotype confirming questions than disconfirming questions

30
Q

Ultimate attribution error (Pettigrew, 1979)

A

Negative/stereotypic behaviours are attributed to disposition
Positive/counterstereotypic behaviours are attributed to the situation

31
Q

Barrett & Bliss Moreau (2009)

A

Participants were shown emotional faces with situational explanations and asked to judge whether the targets were emotional or having a bad day
Male and female participants made more dispositional attributions for female faces - consistent with the stereotype

32
Q

Self-fulfilling prophecy (Snyder, Tanke & Berscheid, 1977)

A

When stereotypic expectancies lead us to behaviour in a way that encourages stereotype-consistent behaviour in the outgroup - further confirming our expectancies

33
Q

Evidence for self-fulfilling prophecy (Chen & Bargh, 1997)

A

Perceiver condition - subliminally primed with faces of African Americans or Caucasians in a dot counting task (AA condition primed stereotype of hostility)
Target condition - dot counting task with no subliminal prime
Perceiver and target pair played a game of catch phrase via microphone
Judges rated the level of verbal hostility
The stereotype condition were judged as more hostile in both the perceiver and the target

34
Q

Devine (1989)

A

Stereotypes learnt in childhood —> long history of activation —-> automatic activation

35
Q

What is a moderator?

A

A variable which changes/affects the strength or direction of a relationship between two other variables
A variable which causes a relationship between two other variables

36
Q

Dual Process Theory

A

Devine (1989)
Automatic processes - stereotypes are automatically activated regardless of prejudice level (stereotypes learned in childhood)
Controlled processes - people have the cognitive resources to control their response, they can inhibit the stereotype and express personal beliefs

37
Q

Devine (1989) Experiment 2

A

Do high and low prejudice people both automatically activate stereotypes?
Parafoveal priming with labels and stereotypes of African Americans (two conditions, 80% priming vs 20% priming)
Stereotype activation measured via impression formation task
Ppts read an ambiguously stereotypic description (hostile) of ‘Donald’s day’ and asked to rate him on hostility related/unrelated traits
Ppts unaware of task’s racial purpose
Hostility ratings higher in 80% than in 20% condition
Not moderated by prejudice, both high and low prejudice people formed more hostile impressions
Everyone activates stereotypes regardless of prejudice level

38
Q

Evaluation of Devine’s methods

A

Used pejorative labels, negative stereotypic traits and associated concepts, could have directly activated hostility for all participants?
Hostility has been primed for all participants, masking any individual differences in the strength of association of hostility to the group of African Americans (Wittenbrink et al. 1997)
Current practice is to prime participants with neutral category labels, not stereotypic traits

39
Q

Kawakami, Dion & Dovidio (1998) - Experiment 1

A

Do high and low prejudice people both automatically activate stereotypes?
Participants primed with neutral category labels (Black, White) followed by stereotypic and non-stereotypic words, ppts asked to pronounce each trait out loud
Stereotype activation is inferred from shorter pronunciation latencies to stereotypic traits following the Black prime relative to the White prime
High prejudice people automatically activate stereotypes whereas low prejudice people do not

40
Q

Sinclair & Kunda (1999) - Experiment 3

A

Ppts answered a series of questions on interpersonal skills
Positively/negatively evaluated by a Black/White doctor
Stereotype activation assessed using lexical decision task (words associated with Black stereotypes and those associated with doctors)
Ppts who received negative feedback from a Black doctor tended to activate traits associated with racial stereotypes, but inhibit those associated with the doctor
Ppts who received positive feedback tended to activate traits associated with the doctor stereotype, and inhibit those associated with the racial stereotype

41
Q

Conclusion of Sinclair & Kunda (1999)

A

Self-enhancement
Activating Black stereotypes allows negative feedback to be discounted
Activating doctor stereotype allows positive feedback to have more legitimacy

42
Q

Stereotype threat definition

A

The concern experienced by a person when there is a possibility that they may act in a way consistent with negative stereotypes (Steele & Aronson, 1995)

43
Q

Steele & Aronson (1995)

A

Black participants performed worse that White participants on a test presented as a measure of their intellectual ability, but performed equally well when no reference was made to intellectual ability

44
Q

Spencer, Steele and Quinn (1999)

A

Women performed worse than men on a maths test when told that it revealed gender differences, but performed equally well when not told this

45
Q

Koenig & Eagly (2005)

A

Men perform worse on an interpersonal perception task when told that it assesses social sensitivity (and that men usually perform worse than women), relative to when told it assesses complex information processing

46
Q

Frantz, Cuddy, Burnett, Ray and Hart (2004)

A

Do White American Psychology students experience stereotype threat in relation to concern about appearing racist?
White Americans negatively stereotyped as racist
Implicit Association Test (IAT) measure racial attitudes
Explicit threat, no threat or no instruction group
Explicit threat condition showed greater Pro-White bias than those in the other conditions
The no instruction group showed more bias than the no threat condition

47
Q

What is the ‘leaky pipeline’

A

When there is an increasing loss of women up the career ladder within STEM subjects

48
Q

Effort to plug the ‘leaky pipeline’

A

Government: 2013 Science and Technology Select Committee Inquiry
Universities recognising commitment to advance women’s careers in STEM

49
Q

Other effects of stereotype threat

A

Withdrawal from stereotyped domain

Learning in the stereotyped domain

50
Q

Davies, Spencer, Quinn and Gerhardstein (2002)

A

Does stereotype threat undermine women’s career aspirations?
Women exposed to gender-stereotypic TV ads reported less interest in pursuing qualifications/careers in fields involving quantitive skills

51
Q

Rydell, Rydell and Boucher (2010)

A

Does stereotype threat reduce women’s ability to learn mathematical concepts and rules?
Females under stereotype threat showed attenuated learning of math rules learnt when under threat, compared to females no exposed to threat

52
Q

Reframing and Reappraisal

A

Stereotype threat effects are reduced when tests are reframed as a challenging learning experience (Alter, Aronson, Darlev, Rodriguez and Ruble, 2010)
Stereotype threat effects are reduced when anxiety is presented as helpful rather than harmful to performance (Johns, Inzlicht & Schmader, 2008)

53
Q

De-emphasis of threatened social identity or domain

A

Stereotype threat effects are reduced when participants are given the opportunity to list negative and positive attributes that describe their personal rather than social identity (Ambady, Paik, Steele, Owen-Smith & Mitchell, 2004)

54
Q

Miyake et al. (2010)

A

Men and women on an intro physics course competed intervention twice during the semester
Values affirmation group - choose most important value and write about why it is important to you
Control group - choose least important value and write about why it is important to others
Mean overall score was higher for women in the values affirmation condition, both male scores were higher
The mean end-of-semester score was higher for women in the values affirmation group, and this was higher than the male score in this condition