Affirmative Action Flashcards

1
Q

What is affirmative action?

A

Active action favouring those who tend to suffer from discrimination (eg. women in the workplace)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How did affirmative action originate?

A

When soldiers came back from war to no jobs, action was taken to get them back into work
Therefore people thought that they could extrapolate this onto other disadvantaged people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Women earn on average ____ less than male counterparts

A

20%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the Equality Act (2010) require?

A

Monitoring to identify barriers
Actions to remove barriers
Annual report to government agency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How can we address barriers to gender equality?

A

Positions - calculate proportion of positions/promotions earned by women

Candidates - calculate proportion of qualified women in candidate pool

Work-force - estimate proportion of qualified women in the broader work-force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Candidates < work-force

A

Barrier in recruitment procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Positions < candidates

A

Barrier in selection procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Positions < work-force

A

Barrier in selection or recruitment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Objections to affirmative action

A
  1. We don’t need it, everyone knows discrimination is wrong and so won’t do it
  2. Bias will be eliminated once it is identified, anti-discrimination laws already exist so we don’t need any action
  3. Things will continue to get better, so we don’t need specific affirmative action programmes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Modern prejudice is expressed in subtle ways

A

Defence of traditional ways - justifies maintenance
Exaggeration of differences - women can’t do this job because…
Positivity bias - low-status groups not actively prejudiced, just viewed less positively than high-status groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Structural/institutional barriers still exist

A

Advertising on limited basis - excludes groups out of networks
Providing narrow category of opportunity to all - excludes groups who can’t take advantage of opportunity
Differential impact of standards and criteria - groups may be adversely affected by the status quo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Konrad & Linnehan, 1998; Reskin, 1998 - example of advertising opportunities on a limited basis

A

Position or promotion has to be filled quickly (internally)
Department head nominate qualified candidates
Typically nominate people they know well
Builds old boys networks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Example of narrow category of opportunities

A

Male professor holds prize draw for 2nd bed in hotel room at professional conference
Male students always won
Female students didn’t feel comfortable entering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Crosby, Iyer, Clayton & Downing (2003) - example of differential impacts of standards

A

Setting unnecessarily high standards that some groups fail to meet
Narrowly defining selection criteria so some groups are excluded (admissions tests)
Using equipment and resources that suit some groups (antigravity suits for fighter pilots didn’t fit women)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Individuals may not attribute negative outcomes to discrimination

A

Attribution theory - we identify cause of an outcome to internal attributions
‘I just wasn’t good enough’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Bergmann (1996)

A

Individuals may not file formal complaints due to a lack of knowledge or resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Fine & Barreras (2001)

A

Individuals may not file formal complaints due to discomfort with confrontation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Kaiser & Miller (2001)

A

Individuals may not file formal complaints due to fear of derogation by colleagues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Reskin (1998)

A

Individuals may not file formal complaints due to fear of retaliation from authorities

20
Q

Assumption: those who are not directly affected by bias are best positioned to identify and challenge it

A

But most observers are not in a position to notice bias because they do not have access to the information for the entire organisation

21
Q

Stereotype threat - Steele & Aronson (1995)

A

Awareness of negative stereotype about an in-group can hurt individuals performance in that domain
(Girls told that girls perform worse at science/maths actually performed less well)

22
Q

von Hippel et al (2011; 2015)

A

Female employees experiencing stereotype threat experience lower well-being

23
Q

von Hippel et al (2011; 2013)

A

Female employees experiencing stereotype threat experience lower sense of belonging

24
Q

Hall et al, (2015); von Hippel et al (2015)

A

Female employees experiencing stereotype threat experience higher burnout rate and intentions to quit the job

25
Q

Members of stereotyped groups may perform ____, reinforcing the stereotype of _____

A

Worse, incompetence

26
Q

Existence of inequality may encourage members of _____ groups to ______ from the domain

A

Disadvantaged, disengage

27
Q

Strategies of disengagement

A

Discounting feedback received in the domain (becoming a rebel who doesn’t take standards seriously)
Devaluing (and then leaving) the domain entirely

Crocker & Quinn (1998); Major et al., (1998); Schmader et al. (2001)

28
Q

_____ reinforces the idea that the disadvantaged group _____

A

Disengagement, doesn’t really belong

29
Q

Affirmative action is needed because…

A

Policies and practices are biased
Bias may not be noticed or challenged
Left unchecked, inequality is perpetuated

30
Q

Reducing bias and discrimination - recruitment procedure

A

Formalise advertising

Increases access and information for all groups

31
Q

Increase representation of women - recruitment procedure

A

Expand recruitment beyond standard strategies

Offer training and mentoring programmes

32
Q

Reducing bias and discrimination - selection procedure

A

Formalise selection criteria
Ensure no differential impact of criteria
Make process transparent and subject to review
Have different perspectives on selection committee

33
Q

Increase representation of women - selection procedure

A

Gender as a plus factor when all other factors are equal

34
Q

Positive effects of affirmative action

A

Increased representation of target group
AA hires typically as strong as non-AA hires
Organisation’s performance does not suffer

35
Q

Negative effects of affirmative action

A

Representation is still too low
Stigma of being selected under AA policy
Negative views of (presumed) beneficiaries

36
Q

Why is AA often not implemented properly?

A
  • Opposition can prevent effective implementation
  • Required changes are hard to sustain
  • Competing demands for scarce resources
37
Q

What can be done to address the fact that AA is often not implemented properly?

A

Reduce opposition
- educate employees about need for AA
- highlight organisation’s support for AA
Encourage sustained change
- Devote resources to oversight and enforcement

38
Q

What reduces the stigma effect?

A

Positive feedback

39
Q

Is the stigma effect replicated in surveys of real employees?

A

No

40
Q

What can be done to address the stigma effect?

A

Provide positive feedback about performance
Establish support networks and programs
Highlight organisation’s support for all employees

41
Q

What reduces the negative views of presumed beneficiaries?

A

When positive information is provided about the person

42
Q

What can be done to address the negative view of beneficiaries?

A

Provide positive information about all employees (this group performed well on this task and all people contributed etc)
Highlight organisation’s support for all employees

43
Q

Explaining opposition to affirmative action

A

As a function of the programme
As a function of the individual
As a function of the social context

44
Q

Opposition as a function of the programme

A

Opposition increases as weight given to target group increases
Focus on the target group presumably reduces weight on merit

45
Q

Opposition as a function of the individual

A

Justice concerns or principled opposition
- people that perceive the programme as violating principles of justice or fairness are more strongly opposed

Prejudice

  • people with higher prejudice are more strongly opposed
  • effect exists even after controlling for other explanations, such as political conservatism and principled opposition
46
Q

Opposition as a function of the social context

A

When rationale is provided for the AA programme, opposition is lower
When leaders publicly support AA, opposition among employees is lower