Step 4D - How a Christian community relates artistically to its broader church and cultural context Flashcards

1
Q

discover a Christian community’s arts

A

o in which contexts do people act as part of this community (e.g., visits to sick people, ministries, food pantry, etc.)
o arts used in these contexts?
o who has significant artistic gifts, whether being used in church or not?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

compare Christian community’s use of arts with…

A

…with that of surrounding communities (i.e., compare with Step 1, general community)—explore potential for using those not currently in use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

evaluate how Christian community’s arts…

A

…currently fulfill its purposes (align well?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

apply heart arts questionnaire to Christian community-

A

which artistic genres touch people’s hearts most? how to potentially modify from what currently doing to include these new ones?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

evaluate worship meetings using biblical principles-

A

what art forms available for best expressing praise, prayer, learning, devotion? postures?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

evaluate Christian community using the worship wheel - source

A

Saurmans in Neeley & Schrag (2005)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Saurmans in Neeley & Schrag (2005)

A

Worship Wheel; Todd and Mary Saurman’s diagram of ways we have arts (arts for the Lord, self, others, celebrations/ceremonies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

assess a multicultural Christian community’s arts-

A

is ethnic diversity reflected in artistic expressions?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

interpret Scripture well sources

A

Duvall & Hays (2001); Hill (2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Duvall & Hays (2001)

A

interpretive journey between the “biblical village” and “our village today”: identify river, build a bridge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hill (2003)

A

written/oral contextual helps improve comprehension by nearly 40%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

address theological objections sources

A

Hill & Hill (2010); Harbinson (1993); Harris (2007); Priest (1994); Schrag (2005); Krabill (2013); Collard (2013); chart from Shelter (2001), West (2001), Hiebert (1985); King (2013)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Translating the Bible into Action

Hill & Hill (2010)

A

include lessons on exploring the arts from a biblical perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Harbinson (1993)

A

statements about artistic communication in the Bible
• God created man in His image (to be creators)
• aesthetic pleasure comes from God (created it pleasing to the sight)
• humans are culture shapers
• God calls people to artistic communication
• diverse expressions please God (Psalm 150)
• heart and allegiance more important than form (Amos 5:23,24)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Harris (2007) - sources she cites

A

Kraft (1996); Hiebert (1985); Hill & Hill (2010); Liesch (2004[2001]); Best (2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Kraft (1996)

A

model: LOCAL forms and CHRISTIAN meanings = appropriate church (cf. local-local, Sakha feed fire, campers with bonfire; foreign-local or foreign-foreign, syncretism) [Note: form is cultural expression; relevant factor is meaning in thought processes of people]

17
Q

Hiebert (1985)

A

standards, 4 steps, (1) gather info from locals about forms/current meanings; (2) study biblical teachings/principles relating to forms; (3) evaluate local forms in light of biblical teachings, (4) but, most of all, encourage locals to make the final decisions

18
Q

Hill & Hill 2010 (cited by Harris 2007)

A

ch. 9, “identifying relevant issues”—parallel Hiebert’s, but step 1 focuses on felt needs

19
Q

Liesch (2004[2001])

A

bad associations don’t spoil goodness of materials; form is neutral, affected only by condition of the heart

20
Q

Best (2003)

A

change needs to come from new heart, not from new outward forms

21
Q

Priest (1994)

A

elenctics—overlapping (or not) triangles of culture/Truth

22
Q

Schrag (2005)

A

limitations to participation: (1) spiritual boundaries; (2) moral; (3) safety (Schrag recrafted traditional song; added Scripture song to memorial service for grandfather)

23
Q

Krabill (2013)

A

importation; adaptation; alteration; imitation; indigenization; internationalization (1914—African Queen approach vs. William Wade Harris)

24
Q

Collard (2013)

A

since 16th century, being worked out of church, but now “a quiet renaissance stirring”; seek forgiveness and move forward (reasons for issues: theology not broad enough to include arts expressions; pastors don’t know how to use due to current lack of inertia/current practices; perception that artists are problematic people)

25
Q

chart from Shelter (2011); West (2011); Hiebert (1985)

A
  • TOTAL REJECTION = underground, Christianity viewed as foreign = dualism, others reject
  • TRANSFORMATION = transform art forms = integration
  • TOTAL ACCEPTANCE = not take captive thoughts (2 Cor 10:5) = syncretism
26
Q

King (2013)

A

musical meaning lies within receptor; develop theology of music-in-context (OT precedent); be sure new songs represent Scripture accurately