Stages Of Attachment Flashcards
What are the 4 stages of attachment
- Asocial stage
- Indiscriminate stage
- Specific attachment
- Multiple attachments
What does ‘All Infants Say Mum’ stand for
Asocial, indiscriminate, specific, multiple attachments
Outline Schaffer and Emerson’s (1964) research into the formation of early attachments
METHOD
- involved 60 babies, 31 male and 29 female from working-class families in Glasgow
- the mothers were visited every month for the first year and then again at 18 months
- they were asked questions about the kind of protest that the babies showed in 7 everyday separations
- parents also kept a diary of their observations
FINDINGS
- between 25 and 32 weeks 50% of infants showed separation anxiety towards a particular adult (typically the mother) this is a specific attachment
- by 40 weeks 80% of infants had a specific attachment And 29% displayed multiple attachments
What is the asocial stage
- Infants can’t distinguish between people and objects.
- babies may show some preference to human features towards the end of the stage
- first few weeks
What is the indiscriminate stage
- infants have a preference to people over objects
- They have no preference for particular humans
- accept comfort and cuddles and comfort from any adults therefore INDISCRIMINATE
- between 2-7 months
- no separation or stranger anxiety
What is the specific attachment stage
- from around 7 months infants start to show stranger anxiety and separation anxiety from one particular adult (this is the specific attachment)
- this favoured adult is the primary attachment figure
What is the multiple attachments stage
- shortly after an infant forms a specific attachments they will start to extend this behaviour towards other adults they spend time with (secondary attachments)
- in Schaffer and Emerson’s study 29% of infants formed a secondary attachment within a month of forming a primary attachment
- by around the age of 1 most infants would have formed multiple attachments
AO3 evaluation of the stages of attachment
- difficult to gather meaningful data about the asocial stage as infant behaviour may not be deliberate making it questionable and unreliable
- Schaffer and Emerson’s study may lack population validity as it only looked at people from Glasgow who were working class (cultural bias) making findings hard to apply to other cultures
- Schaffer and Emersons study used a good sample size with no gender bias making the results more reliable, high internal validity
The problem with stage theories is that they propose a fixed order for development. For example, in some cultures, multiple attachments might come first. This will be problematic if the stages become a standard to which some families are judged and classed as abnormal
what do the stages of attachment tell us about human attachment
- highlighted that attachment is INNATE as people are following similar stages, if the attachment wasn’t innate we wouldn’t have a similar timeframe for attachment
- this is in line with Bowlby’s theory of human attachment