St Anselm’s Ontological argument Flashcards
Question: What is the first premise (P1) of Anselm’s Ontological Argument?
Answer: God is the greatest conceivable being (by definition).
Question: What is the second premise (P2) of Anselm’s Ontological Argument?
Answer: It is greater to exist in reality than in the mind alone.
Question: What is the third premise (P3) of Anselm’s Ontological Argument?
Answer: God exists in the mind.
Question: What is the conclusion (C1) of Anselm’s Ontological Argument based on the premises?
Therefore, God exists in reality.
Question: How does Anselm illustrate the concept of existence in the mind versus reality?
Answer: Anselm uses the illustration of a painter who has an idea of what they will paint in their mind before painting it in reality, showing that ideas can exist in the mind.
Question: What biblical reference does Anselm use to support his argument?
Answer: Anselm points to Psalm 14:1: “the fool says in his heart, ‘there is no God’.”
Question: How does Anselm address the atheist’s perspective in his argument?
Answer: Anselm argues that an atheist, by claiming not to believe in God, must still have an idea of God in their mind.
Question: Why does Anselm argue that it is incoherent to think that God exists only in the mind?
Answer: Because we could conceive of something greater, i.e., God existing in reality, and since God is the greatest being, conceiving of anything greater is incoherent.
Question: What does Anselm conclude about the idea of God existing only in the mind?
Answer: Anselm concludes that to say God exists only in the mind is to say that the greatest being is not the greatest being, which is self-contradictory.
Question: Summarize Anselm’s key quote about the greatest conceivable being.
Answer: “That, than which nothing greater can be conceived, cannot exist in the understanding alone: then it can be conceived to exist in reality; which is greater… Hence, there is no doubt that there exists a being, than which nothing greater can be conceived, and it exists both in the understanding and reality.”