SST & human mate choice Flashcards
Sexual strategies theory
Human sexual selection
Buss & Schmitt, 1993
successful replication, cross-culturally
Human mate choices & mating strategies
- Short-term strategy
- multiple mates
- limited mutual obligation
- limited duration
- Long-term strategy
- exclusive sexual access to 1 individual
- extensive mutual obligation
- long duration - through child-rearing
Links to parental investment theory!
- investment in offspring is valuable
- protected by females (greater investment)
- competed for by males (lesser investment)
Principles of SST
Different reproductive constraints
- ♀ investment
- ♂ access
→ Different adaptive problems
- ♀ mate choice, minimise cost
- ♂ long/short term strategy
→→ Different psychological mechanisms
- find different things attractive
Male short term sexual strategies
- identify fertility & sexual maturity
- minimise investment
- maximise no. of partners
Benefits
- direct increase in reproductive fitness
Costs
- conflict w/ others
- damage LT strategies
- costly in terms of energy, resources, time
How have men evolved to maximise their number of ST partners?
Buss & Schmitt 1993
Men evolved a desire for sexual access to many women
Predict
- Lower standards for ST mates in men compared to women
- ♀ & ♂ rate desirability of qualities in ST sex partner
- -3 extremely undesirable –> +3 extremely desirable
- Men have far fewer desirable & undesirable qualities - much lower standards for ST mates
- Minimise delay between meeting and intercourse
- Clark & Hatfield, 1989
- % agreement
- go out for coffee ♀ 50%, ♂ 50%
- go to apartment ♀ 5%, ♂ 70%
- go to bed ♀ 0%, ♂ 75%
- men more willing to sleep with someone they just met, women more likely to sleep with them after knowing them some time
- Avoid ST mate requiring commitment
- ‘wants a commitment’ undesirable for ST, desirable for LT
- signs of promiscuity valued in ST mates - shows sexual availability
Female and male standards for ST mates
Desirable qualities
- men rate qualities less desirable in 67% of cases compared to women
- Never rate qualities as more desirable than women
Undesirable qualities
- rated as less consequential than by women by 30% of men
- rated as more consequential than by women by 10% of men
Women’s ST sexual strategies
benefits and costs
Benefits
- indirect benefits - good genes
Costs
- loss of direct benefits of commitment (security, parenting assisstance…)
- damaging to LT strategies
How do women go about ST strategies?
Buss & Schmitt, 1993
Predict
- women more selective than men about ST strategies
- men have lower standards, women still have quite high standards
- less women than men will use ST strategies
- less women than men seek ST strategies, roughly the same for LT
Sociosexual orientation
Individual differences in approaching sexual relationships w/ & w/o commitment
Restricted sociosexual orientation - consistent with LT strategy
Unrestricted sociosexulal orientation - consistent with ST strategy
Measured with Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI) - Penke & Asendorpf, 2008
- behaviour (how often do you….?)
- attitudes (how do you feel about…?)
- desires (how often do you think about…?)
Sex differences in SOI
Penke & Asendorpf, 2008
Little difference for behaviour, women score higher (more LT) on attitude and desire
Female ST strategies evidence
Comparative physiology
Chimps - large testes comp. to body size. Competition bc polygamy
Gorillas - smaller testes. Strength = access to females. Don’t waste energy.
Humans - between the two. Suggests ST strategy use by males in the past
Female ST strategies evidence
Pornography
Pound, 2002
- 9% of pornographic video scenes show multiple males 1 female
- 5% show multiple females 1 male
Men aroused by this bc shows female promiscuity - ST strategies
Female ST strategies evidence
Male phallic physiology
Gollup et al., 2003
Measured displacement of artificial semen from artificial vagina w/ various shapeds of artificial penis
Human shape displaces 75-100% –> suggests shape evolved to remove semen of other males - females using ST strategies
Female ST strategies
Extra-pair paternity
Do women seek out mates while partnered for indirect benefits of genetics?
Scelza, 2011
- Himba people (tribal community); natural fertility population
- ‘omoka’ children (extra-pair paternity) more common in arranged marriages (23.2%) than love matches (0)
Cultural influence on LT mate preferences
Buss (1989)
International Mate Selection Project
37 cultures, 6 continents, 10,000+ P’s
Diverse countries! Polygany and monogamy, cohabitation w/o marriage common and uncommon, races and religions, rich and poor…
Survey
- ♀ & ♂ rate traits 0-3 on importance
- Desirable for all - willing to commit, good parenting, good genes (cultural consistencies)
- Women desire men willing and able to invest - cues to resource acquisition (Buss, 2006)
- Men desire women with high reproductive value
Female LT strategies
- good financial prospets (Buss, 2006)
- high social status education
- industriousness
- older
- all signal ability to acquire resources!
Benefits
- direct benefit - resources
Costs
- loss of indirect benefits - good genes