Sport psych- Leadership* Flashcards
(42 cards)
Define leadership in sport
an individual having enough influence over the behaviour of others to motivate them to follow the individual’s own set goals
what can effective leadership affect?
can affect performance of individuals and teams in all sports
What can a good leader do?
A good leader can motivate others and can give focus or direction to attaining goals e.g success and enjoyment in sport
Example of leader positions in sport
-captain
-manager
-director
-coach
-physio
-team psychologist
what is leadership important in?
influencing behaviour in sport
what did sport psychologist Barrow (1977) see leadership as?
- saw leadership as ‘the behavioural process influencing individuals and groups towards a set goal’
what does leadership involve and what does is affect?
-leadership involves personal relationships and affects the motivation of individuals and groups
what are the qualities that an effective leader has/ qualities of leadership?
-good communication skills
-high motivation
-enthusiasm
-having a clear goal/ vision that needs to be achieved
-empathy
-being good at the sport/ comprehensive knowledge
-charisma -> certain presence and great powers of persuasion
How can someone have leadership qualities?
-some qualities may be learned
-some may be seen as innate
what are emergent leaders?
-come from within the group because they are skilful or been selected by the team
what are prescribed leaders?
-Prescribed leaders are appointed to a team from an external source
what are there in both methods of becoming a leader?
There are both advantages and disadvantages in both methods of becoming a leader (emergent and prescribed)
Advantages of emergent leaders
-can win over the ‘hearts and minds’ of team mates as they are recognised as being one of their own- rather than being seen as unknown and a potentially threatening ‘outsider’
Disadvantage of an emergent leader
-may lack objectivity
-may have own friendships within the group that may colour their judgment
|> e.g a for a captain or manager making team selection decisions
Advantage of prescribed leaders
-more objective
-could bring a ‘fresh pair of eyes’ to a team or individuals-> may result in more creative strategies being implemented
-may carry more authority or power that has been given to them by others
Disadvantage of prescribed leaders
-might be that they are not aware or do not share:
-team culture
-ways of working or friendship groups
|> this may delay effective decision making
what are the 3 styles of leadership?
- autocratic-> task orientated, more dictatorial in style, make most of the decisions, tend to have commanding and directing approaches, show little interest in individuals making up the group
- Democratic- person oriented, value views of other group members, share decisions
- Laissez- faire- may very few decisions, give little feedback, individual group members do as they wish
Describe autocratic style of leadership
-when the leader makes most of the decisions
-concentrates on the job to be done or is more concerned with the end product-> such as performance or winning, or has a clear pre- determined goal
When is autocratic style of leadership used?
-when discipline and control are needed
-or when hostile groups are involved
-used when there is a lack of time
-for the early (cognitive stage) of learning
-novice performers, team players, males prefer an autocratic style from their leader
-this style is best when situation is dangerous or when task is clear and unambiguous
-also if leaders personality is autocratic or authoritarian
Describe democratic style of leadership
-this is where the leader is more concerned with interpersonal relations and is more person/ social orientated in their approach
-leader invites contributions and shares the decision making
Explain the use of democratic leadership style
-when group members wish or are able to participate in decision- making
-suits more advanced performers who have the knowledge to contribute or motivate group members
-a social/ friendly match suits this style, or when a attacks demands greater interpersonal communication, and is the leader and group members are well known to each other
-research-> females more likely to prefer this approach
-suitable if task/ situation is not dangerous
-suited for small teams or individual sports people
-suitable if leaders personality lends itself to a democratic or social approach
-when more time available
Describe laissez- faire style
-when leader has no direct influence on group members
- or leader takes a back seat, less groups members make their own decisions
Explanation of the Laissez- faire style of leadership
-suitable for high level performers and elite athletes
-helps to develop creativity for team members or individuals
-leader has full trust in all members capabilities
-suitable if task involves individual decision making
|> or is leader is creating an assessment situation/ assessing group members
-style may also be adopted if leader is incompetent or unable to employ any other style of leadership
why should coaches not rely on the autocratic approach?
may result is hostility and may deter athletes from taking on any personal responsibility in situations where their coach is not present