Sport psych- Leadership* Flashcards

(42 cards)

1
Q

Define leadership in sport

A

an individual having enough influence over the behaviour of others to motivate them to follow the individual’s own set goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what can effective leadership affect?

A

can affect performance of individuals and teams in all sports

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What can a good leader do?

A

A good leader can motivate others and can give focus or direction to attaining goals e.g success and enjoyment in sport

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Example of leader positions in sport

A

-captain
-manager
-director
-coach
-physio
-team psychologist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is leadership important in?

A

influencing behaviour in sport

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what did sport psychologist Barrow (1977) see leadership as?

A
  • saw leadership as ‘the behavioural process influencing individuals and groups towards a set goal’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does leadership involve and what does is affect?

A

-leadership involves personal relationships and affects the motivation of individuals and groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the qualities that an effective leader has/ qualities of leadership?

A

-good communication skills
-high motivation
-enthusiasm
-having a clear goal/ vision that needs to be achieved
-empathy
-being good at the sport/ comprehensive knowledge
-charisma -> certain presence and great powers of persuasion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How can someone have leadership qualities?

A

-some qualities may be learned
-some may be seen as innate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are emergent leaders?

A

-come from within the group because they are skilful or been selected by the team

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are prescribed leaders?

A

-Prescribed leaders are appointed to a team from an external source

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are there in both methods of becoming a leader?

A

There are both advantages and disadvantages in both methods of becoming a leader (emergent and prescribed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Advantages of emergent leaders

A

-can win over the ‘hearts and minds’ of team mates as they are recognised as being one of their own- rather than being seen as unknown and a potentially threatening ‘outsider’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Disadvantage of an emergent leader

A

-may lack objectivity
-may have own friendships within the group that may colour their judgment
|> e.g a for a captain or manager making team selection decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Advantage of prescribed leaders

A

-more objective
-could bring a ‘fresh pair of eyes’ to a team or individuals-> may result in more creative strategies being implemented
-may carry more authority or power that has been given to them by others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Disadvantage of prescribed leaders

A

-might be that they are not aware or do not share:
-team culture
-ways of working or friendship groups
|> this may delay effective decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what are the 3 styles of leadership?

A
  1. autocratic-> task orientated, more dictatorial in style, make most of the decisions, tend to have commanding and directing approaches, show little interest in individuals making up the group
  2. Democratic- person oriented, value views of other group members, share decisions
  3. Laissez- faire- may very few decisions, give little feedback, individual group members do as they wish
18
Q

Describe autocratic style of leadership

A

-when the leader makes most of the decisions
-concentrates on the job to be done or is more concerned with the end product-> such as performance or winning, or has a clear pre- determined goal

19
Q

When is autocratic style of leadership used?

A

-when discipline and control are needed
-or when hostile groups are involved
-used when there is a lack of time
-for the early (cognitive stage) of learning
-novice performers, team players, males prefer an autocratic style from their leader
-this style is best when situation is dangerous or when task is clear and unambiguous
-also if leaders personality is autocratic or authoritarian

20
Q

Describe democratic style of leadership

A

-this is where the leader is more concerned with interpersonal relations and is more person/ social orientated in their approach
-leader invites contributions and shares the decision making

21
Q

Explain the use of democratic leadership style

A

-when group members wish or are able to participate in decision- making
-suits more advanced performers who have the knowledge to contribute or motivate group members
-a social/ friendly match suits this style, or when a attacks demands greater interpersonal communication, and is the leader and group members are well known to each other
-research-> females more likely to prefer this approach
-suitable if task/ situation is not dangerous
-suited for small teams or individual sports people
-suitable if leaders personality lends itself to a democratic or social approach
-when more time available

22
Q

Describe laissez- faire style

A

-when leader has no direct influence on group members
- or leader takes a back seat, less groups members make their own decisions

23
Q

Explanation of the Laissez- faire style of leadership

A

-suitable for high level performers and elite athletes
-helps to develop creativity for team members or individuals
-leader has full trust in all members capabilities
-suitable if task involves individual decision making
|> or is leader is creating an assessment situation/ assessing group members
-style may also be adopted if leader is incompetent or unable to employ any other style of leadership

24
Q

why should coaches not rely on the autocratic approach?

A

may result is hostility and may deter athletes from taking on any personal responsibility in situations where their coach is not present

25
what may be the result of the democratic approach?
-les work being done -but will increase the positive effects of interaction
26
Should the laissez-fair approach be avoided?
YES -this approach should be avoided in most situations -although this style does encourage more creativity amongst team members, and give them more responsibility
27
what did the psychologist Lewin (1939) research?
-looked at styles of leadership that groups prefer -boys with a democratic leader got on much better -they did less work than with an autocratic leader, but the work was comparable in quality
28
The results of research by sport psychologists led by crust (2006) in a review of leadership in sport show the following: (4 points)
1. Novice athletes prefer more rewards, experts prefer more democratic and social support coaching 2.Team performers, prefer more training and instruction, autocratic coaching+ rewards Individual sports people-> prefer democratic coaching and social support 3. Male athletes prefer autocratic style Females-> democratic 4.Older athletes- prefer democratic coaching, social support and training and instruction |> athletes of all ages seem to value rewards equally
29
what are the 3 theories of leadership?
-Trait perspective -Social learning theory -interactionist theory
30
Trait perspective theory of leadership
-claims that leaders have a genetic disposition, innate characteristics that show leader qualities |> "leaders are born not made" -doubted that all characteristics are fully down to innate disposition -shows that leadership traits are stable and enduring |> and can be generalised across diff situations, makes some people leaders in whatever situation that they are in
31
Argument against trait theory
-people in sport tend to be quite specific in their leadership skills, depending on their particular situation, which works against the more generalised approach of trait perspective
32
what doe trait perspective assume?
-certain traits produce certain patterns of behaviour -these patterns are consistent across different situations -people are born with these leadership traits
33
Social learning theory of leadership
-theory claims that leadership characteristics are learned from others -behaviour of others is watched and copied-> vicarious learning/ reinforcement -if you observe another (the model) showing leadership behaviour+ that person is of higher status than you->you are more likely to copy that behaviour (role model/ significant other) -a person in sport may show leadership behaviour that has been learned from other significant people
34
what does social learning theory show the importance of?
-shows the importance of the social environment for adopting leadership qualities -different from the trait approach which does not take the environment into account
35
Interactionist theory of leadership
-states that and individual may have in-born traits e.g assertiveness, but they are not evident unless a situation (state) demands the leadership behaviour -theory accounts for that some popped are not leaders in everyday life, but can show leadership qualities sin sporting situations -interactionist approach involves the interaction if traits (innate) and the changing environment
36
what is contingency approach?
the success of leadership traits is determined by situational factors
37
what is vicarious learning?
the person observes that a rewards is given to another person for certain behaviours and learns to emulate the same behaviour
38
what is Fiedler's contingency model of leadership?
-1967 -composed a model which looked at the way a leader interacts with the situation finds themselves in -he used two classifications of leader- the task-orientated leader (focus on peformance) and the person-orientated leader (focus on personal relationships) -saw that the effectiveness of these leaders depends on the favourableness of the situation, which depends on: -relationship between the leader and the group members -the structure of the task -the leaders power an deposition of authority
39
Conclusion of Fiedler's model of leadership
-the situation is most favourable if: -the relationship between leader and group members are warm and positive -the task is clear and unambiguous -leader his in a strong position of authority -is a situation is unfavourable, the opposite applies -according to Fiedler, task- orientated leaders are more effective in situations that are at the extremes (most favourable or least favourable) -person- orientated leaders are most effective in situations that are moderately favourable
40
what is Chelladurai's multi-dimensional model of sports leadership?
-effective leaders depend on situational factors, the characteristics of the leader, and the expectations and natures of the group members
41
SUMMARY of leadership
-leadership involves influencing people towards set goals -leaders can fill positions of responsibility, either b y being emerging or prescribed -main leadership styles: authoritarian, task- orientated style, the democratic, person- orientates style and laissez- faire style -most leaders have a mix of style but tend towards one of them -there are preferred styles amongst sports people, depends on situational and group characteristic variables -leaders may be born or made, research points to social theory and interactionist theory being more realistic -effective leadership depends on situational factors, characteristics of leader, expectations and nature of group members-> known as multi-dimensional model of leadership -Fiedler's theory states that favourableness of the situation must be considered before adopting a particular style
42