Split-brain Research into Hemispheric Lateralisation Flashcards
what is hemisphereic lateralisation?
certian mental procees and behaviours are controlled and dominated by one hemisphere rather than the other
how are the two sides of the brain connected?
a bundle of nerve fibers called the corpus callosum
who did sperry (1968) study?
a group of epileptics whose corpus collaosum was cut (commissurtomy)
what was sperry’s unique procedure to test his split brain patients?
an image or word is projected to a patients RVF (processed by LH) and another image shown to the LVF (processed by RH)
why did sperry use this procedure?
- in his patients the information cannot be conveyed from the chosen hemisphere to there other
- therefore, sperry could cleary define which behaviours were controlled by which hemisphere
what 3 tests did sperry use in his study?
- describing what was seen
- recgnition by touch
- matching faces
Sperry’s findings - describing what you see
objects shown:
- RVF - patient easily describes what was seen
- LVF - pateint says ‘there’s nothing there’
why couldn’t describe what they saw in LVF?
- RH lacks language centres
- messages recieved by RH are normally relayed via corpus collosum to language centres in LH
Sperry’s findings - recognition by touch
objects shown LVF:
- patient could not verbally identify what they had seen (LH needed for this)
- could understand what the object was (using RH) and select the corresponding object .
- eg ashtray selected in response to picture of a feg
Sperry’s findings - matching faces
- LH dominated the verbal desription
- RH dominated the selection of matching picture
what were sperry’s overall findings?
- LH - is more geared towards analytic and verbal tasks (the ‘analyser’)
- RH - is more geared towards spatial tasks and music (the ‘synthesiser’)
what does split brain research show?
certain functions are lateralised
why was Sperry’s research so methodological?
he carefully standardised procedure - patients stared at a fixed point with one eye and an image was flahsed up for 0.1s
what was the significance of an image only being flashed to one eye for 0.1s?
patient had no time to move their eyes over the image and spread the information across both sides of the visual field (susbsequnetly both sides of the brain)
why might sperry’s research lack generlisability?
- only 11 patients took part in all variations
- they all had history of seizures
- may have caused unique changes to brain