Speech Structures Flashcards
1
Q
PMC Speech Structure
A
- Resolutional Analysis (Policy Interp, Net Benefits)
- Background (Inadequacy of Status Quo, how Plan overcomes possible barriers)
- Plan Text (Actor & Action, No Acronyms)
- Solvency (How plan solves the problem, why time and actor are important, and how the plan is better than the SQ)
2
Q
LOC Speech Structure
A
5 mins off-case 3 mins on-case
A-Strat and B-Strat
Disad, Kritik, Topicality, Theory
Case turns (nonunique, Link turn)
3
Q
MG Speech Structure
A
- Offcase (Respond to most important Neg args - Start with T / Topicality)
- MG Theory (45 secs - Condo Bad, PICS bad, etc)
- POST Neg Advocacies (Kritiks, CP’s, DA’s [Prioritize offense by using link and impact turns])
- Extend & Answer Case (Key extensions of PMC including impacts, answer Neg offense)
4
Q
MO Speech Structure (Policy)
A
- Kick Neg advocacies that you are not going for (extend defense that prevents it from being viable, explain how it makes the position moot for both teams)
- Work Through the Case (Key Offense and defensive arguments to extend)
- Win Key offcase Argument (CP, T, Topicality) with focus on each part that you’re winning. Collapse to key int. link/impacts stories
5
Q
MO Speech Structure (Kritiks)
A
Internally Collapse to key arguments on each page. Don’t go for every impact, Extensively answer each key case argument.
6
Q
MO Speech Structure (Theory)
A
(Most of the time) Go 100% for theory. Work through theory position, reinforcing interp and violation. Key standards and prioritize one voter.
7
Q
LOR + PMR Speech Structure
A
- Overview (Main impacts and reasons why you win)
- Weighing Mechanism (Timeframe, Magnitude, Probability) and why you are winning it
- Key Offense (Best uniqueness/link/int link/impact and answer necessary opp args)
- Work through opp’s best args on each page, and extend best offense/defense against it (stop-slow-stop-go method). End page explaining why you outweigh/resolve via weighing mechanism
- (LOR) Pre-empt possible PMC args and counter them
- End on best impact for judge to decide the debate on