SPAF Flashcards
AF sequelae
cardio-embolic stroke
- Uncoordinated contraction in LA
- Clot formation in appendages (LA)
a. Circulatory stasis - Emboli to brain
Cerebral infarction
AF ECG readings
Irregularly irregular rhythm · No P waves
valvular AF
moderate or severe mitral stenosis (LA –> LV)
presence of mechanical prosthetic heart valve
= WARFARIN
non-valvular AF
includes AF with other valvular heart lesions
= DOAC
SPAF
Anticoagulants - VKA
- Reduce stroke risk by 64%, 26% death in AF pt
- Mitral stenosis, mechanical heart valves
SPAF anticoagulants – DOAC preferred?
- Reduce ischemic stroke by 19%, risk of hemorrhage by 50%
- Recommended to all other AF pts
○ CHA2DS2-VASc score =/>2 (offered) ○ CHA2DS2-VASc score <2 (considered)
CHA2DS2 VA
CHF
HTN
Age =/> 75yo (2)
DM
stroke, TIA, thromboembolism (2)
vascular disease
age 65-74
CHADSVASC score 0 (M,F) need to tx?
- No anticoag
- No antiplt (aspirin, * clopidogrel not recom for SPAF)
CHADSVASC score 1 (M,F) meaning
Consider anticoag based on risk factors
CHADSVASC score =/>2
Offer, recommended warfarin/ NOAC
Discuss bleeding risk factors, tx options
favour warfarin (in general)
- maintain INR within therapeutic range TTR 70%
- SE of DOAC
- mod-severe liver or renal impairment
- sig DDI with DOAC
- valvular AF, APS
- GI alterations
favour DOAC
- pt unable to monitor INR (venous access/ lab access)
- reluctant to monitor VKA, narrow TI)
- DDI
- ease of dosing
- safer (less major bleeds)
bleeding risk HASBLED
max 9
HTN > 160mmHg
Abnormal renal function SCr > 200umol/L OR Ab liver function AST, ALT >3X [1,1]
stroke (hx)
bleeding (hx / predispose)
labile INR (<6/10 in range)
elderly (>65yo)
Drug (antiplt, NSAID, alc >8unit/wk) [1,1pt]
HASBLED scores
0 = low risk
1-2 = mod risk
=/> 3 = high risk
what to do if there is high risk for bleeding
- assess risk of stroke vs bleeding
- cause of bleeding
- identify & tx comor (HTN)
continue NOAC, dont stop unless CI
consel on need
1) stroke risk
2) SE of OAC – mitigate bleeding risk
3) compare DOAC or VKA
ABC pathway
A: avoid stroke, OAC
B: better sx control (rate BB, CCB> rhythm Na, K)
C: CVS and other comor risk factors
OAC dose for Afib
dabigatran
150mg BD
110mg BD (if =/>80yo/ use PGPi/ high risk of bleed)
no crcl dose adj unless CI <30ml/min
OAC dose for Afib
rivaroxaban
20mg OD
crcl 30-50ml/min : 15mg OD
CI: <15 ml/min
OAC dose for Afib
apixaban
5mg BD
2.5mg BD (any 2: age=/>80yo, weight =/<60kg, scr =/> 1.5mg/dL or 132mmol/L)
crcl 15-29: 2.5mg BD
OAC dose for Afib
edoxaban
60mg OD
30mg OD (if ANY 1: crcl 30-50ml/min, weight =/<60kg, concom verapamil, quinidine, dronedrone)
CI: crcl<15
interval for FU depends on
1mnth: initiate
4mnth: =/>75yo, frail, dabi
crcl/10 mnth: crcl =/< 60ml/min
immediate: hep, renal function (NSAID, infection, dehydration)
at each FU check for:
1) adherence (cognitive, minor bleeds)
2) thromboembolism
3) bleeding (cause??)
4) SE
5) co-medications (aspirin, NSAID)
- blood sampling (hb, LFT, CrCL)
- minimise bleeding risk factors (HTN, medication, INR)
- optimal choice of DOAC?dose?
how much is metabolised by lvier
DRAW
VKA: INR (risk nephropathy, vas calcification)
15-29: consider benefit vs harm
D: 80% kidney 0% substrate, inhibitor, inducer
R: 66% liver metabolised
A: 75% liver
W: 99% liver
E: 50% liver metabolised