soul, mind and body (2) Flashcards

1
Q

plato’s view on the soul

A

dualist. argues that the impermenance of the body must mean there is something permanent. believed soul was perfect and accessed the realm of the forms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Plato’s analogy of the chariot

A

reason is the charioteer who controls wayward horses of spirit (emotions and appetite). we are often taken over by bodily desires, no harmony in the soul.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

argument from recollection

A

says the soul previously witnessed the forms before incarnated into our body. our soul recalls what it knows the immutable forms, so when we se a pretty flower recognise it from form of beauty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

anamensis

A

recollection of innate knowledge which we havent gained through experiences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Socrates

A

example of the slave boy. although he was uneducated he oculd answer maths questions. Plato would say this knowledge is recollected from the soul.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Plato is right there is a seperate soul

A
  • chariteers efficently highlights emotional conflict, when reason is in control there is harmony
  • anamensis makes sense, we understand what is unfair innately
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

argument from opposites

A

recognise there are opposites, light and dark etc. since life is something, death must be something too.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Plato is right there is no seperate soul

A
  • inner conflict can be explained by emotion of immaturity
  • Geach asks how a disembodies soul could ever see the forms
  • example of the slave boy, it is possible to learn and grow through failings,
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

aristotle’s wax

A

thinks the soul cannot be seperated from the body, example of wax seal. the imprint of the seal cannot be seperated from the wax.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Aristotle observations

A

everything was made of matter and had a formal cause. body is material and the soul formal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

chickens

A

a dead chicken and a living has the same material cause but its formal has changed. Aristotle says this is the change, the soul animates the body.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

types of soul

A

vegetative- characteristics of growing
appetitive- ability to act o desires for food
rational- ability to reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Aristotle’s view of the soul is successful

A
  • soul is essential as it is the formal cause of the body (handle of axe the body, soul ability to chop)
  • body and soul cannot be seperated as they are both neccesary for life
  • when the body dies so does the soul, explains the difference despite lack of bodily change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Aristotle’s view of the soul is unsuccessful

A
  • materialists would argue that we are only matter
  • Plato would say soul must return to the realm of the forms after death
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

consiousness

A

intellect and awarness of who we are, the mind body problem is about how they relate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Descartes’ substance dualism

A

argued mind/body totally seperate substances. he questioned how we could be sure about anything as we could just be being deceived. but he concluded we can be sure we are still thinking. cogito ergo sum.

17
Q

Descartes and physical

A

it cannot think and can be divided into parts, but doesnt take away from who you are. must be a different sort of substance. if mind/body seperate there must be a link, the pineal gland- argued it was the home of singular thought.

18
Q

mind and body must be separate

A
  • mind and body are different as they can be treated differently, mind is immaterial.
  • as a thinking being i consider muself whole, the mind must hold our personhood
  • pineal gland explains the communciation
19
Q

mind and body cannot be different

A
  • if someone loses a limb their outlook on life owuld be changed. mind and body close connection
  • how do we define personhood? would we know our classmate in 30 years time due to mind
  • pineal gland secretes hormones, unlikely to communicate,
20
Q

Ryle

A

ghost in the machine- how can a ghostly phenomenon pull levers in a machine

21
Q

Daniel Dennett

A

says substance dualists define the mind as a Cartesian theatre. the mind is an audience of 1 at the theatre, you can observe and control what happens. Dennett says this is incorrect.

22
Q

Ryle’s criticisms

A

says Descartes incorrectly sees the physical actions as controlled by non material mind. incorrect use of language, like visiting Oxford colleges and asking where the uni is.

23
Q

category error

A

a misuse of lang- Ryle says people incorrectly assume there is something extra to everything theyve seen. says Descartes made a category error as he tried to categorise events as mental or physical.

24
Q

Descartes’ error

A

assumes there is something additonal to the body. Ryle argues the body and mind are not 2 substances but different descriptions of personhood and what it means to be human. you wouldnt say ‘my hand’, you would say ‘I’

25
its a category error for mind/body to be different
- personhood involves more processes than just physical and mental - it would be asking where the team spirit is while watching cricket? body and mind cannot be described the same way - body and mind are not distinct as both describes what it means to be human
26
its not a category error for mind/body to be different
- thinking minf is an immaterial substance which is the real me, mind directs body. - physical and body are totally different types of substance
27
argument from doubt
Descartes doubted everything but knew he was still thinking. shows mind/body must be different.
28
mind can be exmplained by physical
Dennet argues there is no place in the mind where consiousness can happen, more likely processes.
29
identity theory
claims that all mental activity is centered in the brain. brain is an organ that can altered by things like drugs. these can cause alter mind which may be described as consious. materialists think decisions are merely brain activity.
30
Dawkins' souls
soul one= ancient idea used by ancient people to explain why humans were rational soul two= intellect or mental activities. Dawkins thinks this will be explained by DNA soon. Dawkins said mental processes gives us the advantage to survive.
31
Blackmore
believes soul is a metaphor for consiousness and personhood. we look for something that does not exist. Blackmore belives we suggest scientists will one day understand consiousness.
32
strengths of materialism
- magnetic sensors can detect when subject's attention moves to different images. - no need for questions about the afterlife - materialism uses science. NASA has used sensors placed on the throat can detect words spoken silently to oneself.
33
weaknesses of materialism
- even if thought and other activities can be tracked by physical changes. nerve functions in brains have no intentions. - reduces all experience down to something physical.
34
materialism is the best approach
- no need to assume the existence of an immaterial soul, brain scans and NASA can trace back consious - consious may not be one thing, rather a combination - immaterial mind would not able to be verified, how would we know - if there is something extra in essence that is not physical.
35
dualism is the best approach
- physical terms cannot describe everything about the individual, there seems to be more to 'me' - Decartes argues that the mind is a place of singular thought - Plato argues that a harmonious soul explains how we recall knowledge - Aristotle believes the soul animates and personifies existence.