soul, mind and body (2) Flashcards
plato’s view on the soul
dualist. argues that the impermenance of the body must mean there is something permanent. believed soul was perfect and accessed the realm of the forms.
Plato’s analogy of the chariot
reason is the charioteer who controls wayward horses of spirit (emotions and appetite). we are often taken over by bodily desires, no harmony in the soul.
argument from recollection
says the soul previously witnessed the forms before incarnated into our body. our soul recalls what it knows the immutable forms, so when we se a pretty flower recognise it from form of beauty.
anamensis
recollection of innate knowledge which we havent gained through experiences.
Socrates
example of the slave boy. although he was uneducated he oculd answer maths questions. Plato would say this knowledge is recollected from the soul.
Plato is right there is a seperate soul
- chariteers efficently highlights emotional conflict, when reason is in control there is harmony
- anamensis makes sense, we understand what is unfair innately
argument from opposites
recognise there are opposites, light and dark etc. since life is something, death must be something too.
Plato is right there is no seperate soul
- inner conflict can be explained by emotion of immaturity
- Geach asks how a disembodies soul could ever see the forms
- example of the slave boy, it is possible to learn and grow through failings,
aristotle’s wax
thinks the soul cannot be seperated from the body, example of wax seal. the imprint of the seal cannot be seperated from the wax.
Aristotle observations
everything was made of matter and had a formal cause. body is material and the soul formal.
chickens
a dead chicken and a living has the same material cause but its formal has changed. Aristotle says this is the change, the soul animates the body.
types of soul
vegetative- characteristics of growing
appetitive- ability to act o desires for food
rational- ability to reason
Aristotle’s view of the soul is successful
- soul is essential as it is the formal cause of the body (handle of axe the body, soul ability to chop)
- body and soul cannot be seperated as they are both neccesary for life
- when the body dies so does the soul, explains the difference despite lack of bodily change
Aristotle’s view of the soul is unsuccessful
- materialists would argue that we are only matter
- Plato would say soul must return to the realm of the forms after death
consiousness
intellect and awarness of who we are, the mind body problem is about how they relate.
Descartes’ substance dualism
argued mind/body totally seperate substances. he questioned how we could be sure about anything as we could just be being deceived. but he concluded we can be sure we are still thinking. cogito ergo sum.
Descartes and physical
it cannot think and can be divided into parts, but doesnt take away from who you are. must be a different sort of substance. if mind/body seperate there must be a link, the pineal gland- argued it was the home of singular thought.
mind and body must be separate
- mind and body are different as they can be treated differently, mind is immaterial.
- as a thinking being i consider muself whole, the mind must hold our personhood
- pineal gland explains the communciation
mind and body cannot be different
- if someone loses a limb their outlook on life owuld be changed. mind and body close connection
- how do we define personhood? would we know our classmate in 30 years time due to mind
- pineal gland secretes hormones, unlikely to communicate,
Ryle
ghost in the machine- how can a ghostly phenomenon pull levers in a machine
Daniel Dennett
says substance dualists define the mind as a Cartesian theatre. the mind is an audience of 1 at the theatre, you can observe and control what happens. Dennett says this is incorrect.
Ryle’s criticisms
says Descartes incorrectly sees the physical actions as controlled by non material mind. incorrect use of language, like visiting Oxford colleges and asking where the uni is.
category error
a misuse of lang- Ryle says people incorrectly assume there is something extra to everything theyve seen. says Descartes made a category error as he tried to categorise events as mental or physical.
Descartes’ error
assumes there is something additonal to the body. Ryle argues the body and mind are not 2 substances but different descriptions of personhood and what it means to be human. you wouldnt say ‘my hand’, you would say ‘I’