religious experience (5) Flashcards

1
Q

William James

A

defined religion as a personal experience, he thought primary experience of the divine was the heart of religion and came before secondary, like texts. emphasised ‘fruits’ of religious experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

core of mystical experiences

A

passive- feeling that you are not in control of the experience
ineffable- experience was difficult to put into words
noetic- provided insight or knowledge
transient- short lasting but a great effect on person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Christian mystics

A

Julian of Norwich- visions of JC when she was close to death. saw JC bleeding in front of her, she used language of love and motherhood to describe him.
Teresa of Avila- she had a vision of a spear poking her in the side and feeling great amount of love.
they both struggled to explain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

mystical experiences are reliable

A
  • James argues that whilst there are pyschological elements, similarities could point to the divine. similar features means more reliable.
  • passive means not desired or expected
  • noetic, how could we explain getting new information
  • transiency shows their influence as short but significant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Scheliermacher

A

there is more to existence than the physical, if we stop and reflect we can realise this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

mystical experiences are not reliable

A
  • could all be in the mind, similarities is because they occur in the pysche
  • passivity could be the unconsious mind convincing itself
  • neurology may one day explain religious experience
  • changing perspective can be found through films or books
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

god helmet

A

Persinger 1997, the experiment had people feeling as if they were beyond themselves- like passivity. a product of electromagnetic radiation, not God. incoclusive results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

pragmatism

A

James based his understanding on pragmatism, practical outcomes seen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

St Paul

A

on his way to Damascus to persecute Christians he converted to Christianity after seeing a vision and became a missionary. Act 9 and 22. he described it as being ‘re-born’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how does James describe conversion

A

inner self is aware of being unhappy and through conversion becomes happy. religious habits become central to life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

S Hadley

A

a homeless drunk who considered suicide. after his conversion he never wanted a strong drink again. his soul had been unified through God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Starbuck and conversion

A

volitional- gradual change of new morals
self-surrender- pivotal and sudden change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Starbuck

A

believed conversion was a ‘normal adolecent phenomenon’ because it mainly happened 15-24. search for identity may result in religion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

fruits of religion

A
  • conviction of something beyond world
  • immense feeling of elation of freedom
  • feeling of having met a friendly power
  • change in emphasis of life, more spiritual and charitable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

conversions are the most convincing religious experience

A
  • pragmastism gives insight and shows there are practical consequences that influence us
  • ‘fruits’ of religion are evident, character shift is convincing
  • even if not possible to directly communicate with God, can still experience his power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

conversions are not the most convincing religious experience

A
  • Starbuck concluded it is normal for young. feeling of depression and loss seen as growing up
  • Kant says its logically impossible to experience God as in world of senses
  • lasting influence not only for religion but other experiences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Teresa of Avila

A

James- used her criteria to see if genuine conversion. it should fit with teachings of church and lead to pos change.
Freud- church cause of much guilt repressed in the super ego. teachings of church manifest in things like prayer.

18
Q

pluralism

A

James argues that there is truth in all religions. he said no argument is sufficient to answer to existence of God. James started with religious experiences and branched out into philosophy.

19
Q

God’s significance

A

whilst he is not definitive, James said there is evidence that Christian and Buddhist role models lived similarily. as experiences are subjective, it is the teachings made following the experience that sets them apart.

20
Q

James pluralism

A

seen through vague descriptions of experiences, wanting to be inclusive. James described religion as a belief in unseen order to the universe.

21
Q

James and a pyschological phenomena

A

says they are psychological with a huge subjective meaning. James says RE do not unequivocally support God, but concludes it could not be ruled out. argues there must be an unconsious power beyond conscience self.

22
Q

religious experiences are evidence for God

A
  • use of pragmatism/empircism v helpful. fruits of experience good proof of God.
  • RE are ultimate reality of God but are spoken about through language influenced by our lives
  • Davis used a cumulative argument to suggest that (along with other args) RE may prove a God
23
Q

religious experiences are not evidence for God

A
  • rationalist would argue that our senses can decieve us. James accounts include people who used drugs.
  • unlikely that one divine source has caused multiple different experiences, Catholics see Mary etc
  • Flew says that one leaky bucket cant hold water, no reason why 10 could
24
Q

Jung

A

pyschologist who considered spirituality and religion essential to human mind. Jung said St Paul experiences a form of emotional breakdown, his guilt triggering his conversion.

25
Feuerbach
argues that God was a pyscological construct, formed from human desires. desire for control lends to an all powerful being.
26
Freud
religion is a neurosis rooted in conflict between a consious and unconsious mind where demands of id/superego try to be balanced. he claims we constructed a father figure, God, as a means of feeling protected
27
problems with psychological construct
Hick developed 'experiencing as' from Wittengenstein, who said 'seeing as'. we all perceieve things in different ways, meaning there could be an underlying 'other' which meant that religion could be experienced differently.
28
psychological effects can explain religious experiences
- evidence of a change in character can be traced back to pyschological factors - some argue that perception is rooted in the mind, religious experiences have no objective truth. - 'inattentional blindness'- ie we see a clear road without the car coming towards it. we can be sincere in our beliefs but be mistaken.
29
psychological effects can not explain religious experiences
- there are long lasting fruits which change a person. it is probable that they are not merely a phenomenan. - we all experience the same thing a different way, we choose how to react so nobody outside can dismiss. - as James noted, there are pyschological elements but this does not negate the importance or effect.
30
effects of diet
drugs and alcohol have mind altering effects, ancient theologians may have had vitamin defincies (B) that lead to hallucinations.
31
effects of brain stimulation
St Paul symptoms of a bright light and unconsious loss may be temperol lobe epilepsy. brain scans on monks when meditating shows how parts of brain effected
32
strengths of physiological explanations for religious experiences
- similar experiences can be produced by electro magnets and may not have supernatural cause - St Paul could have been suffering with epilepsy - fasting in religion can cause vitmain deficinicies- making it more likley for an experience
33
weaknesses of physiological explanations for religious experiences
- if God were to interact then it is logical he would use physical processes, like those in the brain. - reductionist to argue that all human activity to material, it cant explain variety. - difficult to explain the long lasting consequences of such changes
34
corporate
experienced by many people at the same time, like the Pentecost in Acts 2. they provide more evidence and fit with James' empiricism.
35
Toronto blessing
began in 1990s and spread across continents. included speaking in tongues and laughter. it is controversial within christianity, why would God reveal himself in a way that provides no new knowledge
35
problems with corporate
pyschologists would point to social conformity or cases of mass hysteria. questions can also be raised about why God chooses to reveal himself to one group, rather than the starving or persecuted?
36
Swinburne experiences
says religious experiences should be treated as any other private experience, more likely to believe it happened or not.
37
Swinburne's principles
testimony- we usually believe what people tell us, unless we have reason not to. if someone says theyve experienced a nice day we believe them creduilty- unless we have evidence to the contrary we should believe that things are how they seem.
38
corporate religious experiences are more reliable
- more witnesses, cumulative testimony more convincing - empirical impacts, like the Penetcost saw loads of people speaking different languages - Swinburne's principle of creduility defend reliability of corporate
39
individual religious experiences are more reliable
- principle of testimony says we should believe what people tell us. - empirical evidence to a lasting change, 'fruits'. - creduility can also be applied as we should credit indivual with experience unless opposing evidence