Soul, Mind and Body Flashcards
What is Dualism?
The view that there are two different types of existence: mental and physical.
What is Substance Dualism?
Descartes’ version of dualism that the two different types of existence are two different substances, e.g. mental (characterised by thinking) and physical (characterised by extension). A substance is a type of existence which cannot be broken down into anything further.
What is Monism?
The view that there is one kind of existence.
What is Materialism?
The view that the one kind of existence is physical substance.
What is Plato’s Dualism?
Plato believed the body was like a prison for the soul, trapping it in this world of appearances. He thought our souls came from the world of forms and had a vague memory of the forms.
What is Plato’s argument from recollection?
The argument from recollection is one of Plato’s arguments for the existence of the world of forms and also the existence of the soul.
Plato points out that we somehow do have knowledge of perfect, eternal and unchanging concepts. These include concepts like perfect beauty and justice.
How does Plato believe we are born with these concepts, such as beauty and justice?
His answer is that we must have somehow gained these concepts before we were born, a priori. It follows that there must be a part of us (our soul) which existed in a realm where there were perfect forms. In the world of forms there are perfect mathematical forms and perfect forms like the form of beauty and the form of justice.
How are we born with a recollection of the forms, according to Plato?
Our soul apprehends them before becoming trapped in this world of appearances. Anamnesis is the process of re-remembering these forms through a posteriori sense experience.
How is beauty and justice subjective? A critique to Plato.
Beauty and morality are subjective; in the eye of the beholder. They seem like matters of opinion, not fact. It seems to be culture that determines and conditions what a person finds beautiful or just and as a result, views on what is beautiful or just change over time and differ cross-culturally.
What is Hume’s criticism of Plato?
We can actually create the idea of perfection in our minds even if we have never experienced it. We have take our concept of ‘imperfect’ and simply conceive of its negation: ‘not imperfect’ to gain the concept of ‘perfect’.
What is the final conclusion to Plato?
Even if Plato was correct that we were born with perfect concepts, it doesn’t mean a soul and world of forms is the only or even best explanation. Evolution could have programmed us to have a sense of morality, beauty and the evolution of intelligence could explain being born with mathematical ability.
What is Aristotle’s Materialism?
Aristotle rejected the idea of the world of forms as lacking empirical validity, thus he also rejected the idea of some non-physical soul which could have come from such a world. Nonetheless, Aristotle still believes in the soul, but as the form of the physical body.
What is Aristotle referring to ‘form’ as?
Form means essence, which is a thing’s defining characteristic.
However, the essence of a human is not merely its shape. Aristotle claimed the defining feature of a human being is the ability to reason. Aristotle claimed that the soul was the formal cause of the body.
How is Aristotle’s from of causation unscientific?
F. Bacon was called the father of empiricism for establishing the modern scientific method. He claimed that formal causation is a metaphysical matter that was beyond empirical study. He gave the illustration of the ‘whiteness’ of snow and explained how science could investigate how snow results from air and water, but this only tells us about its efficient cause. So Bacon thought that form existed, but Aristotle was wrong to think science could study it it.
What do Neuroscientists believe about rationality and the material brain? A critique to Aristotle.
For Aristotle, the form of a human is a rational soul, but most neuroscientists would claim that rationality reduces to material brain structure and its physical processes. So again, what Aristotle thought of as ‘form’, actually reduces to material structure. There appears to be no room left in modern science for formal or final causation.