Ancient Philosophical Influences Flashcards

1
Q

What did Heraclitus famously say?

A

An ancient Greek Philosopher who thought that the world we experience is in a state of constant change which he called ‘flux’. He famously said that a person never steps in the same river twice, since both the river and the person change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Plato’s argument to Heraclitus?

A

Thinks that the consequence of Heraclitus’ challenge is that true eternal unchanging knowledge cannot be gained empirically, i.e. from a posteriori observation. Plato concludes that we must give up on the attempt to gain knowledge through experience and look to a priori reason alone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Aristotle’s argument to Heraclitus?

A

Thinks that we can understand the causal mechanism responsible for change and thereby gain true knowledge from experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the summary to Plato’s rationalism?

A

Plato thought that we must not be experiencing the world correctly. Our minds are trapped in a state of ignorance, which is why we experience imperfect, transient and everchanging things in the world of appearance. The true reality must be perfect, eternal and unchanging.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Plato refer to the particular as?

A

Particulars are the objects of everyday experience. They are imperfect representations of the form they partake in from which they gain characteristics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why does plato believe we perceive everything through a ‘broken lens’.

A

It is like looking at an object in a broken mirror and perceiving a visually distorted version of it. In the case of Plato’s form however, we are perceiving the forms through the broken lens of our ignorant minds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why is Plato’s theory a priori?

A

We get knowledge of the world of forms through a priori reason, not a posteriori empirical sense experience, which reveals merely a vague shadow of the real world (of forms).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does Plato present the theory through?

A

The allegory of the cave.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does the allegory of the cave represent?

A

Prisoners (us) in a cave (our reality) who cannot move due to being chained (our minds in a state of ignorance).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What do the objects we experience represent?

A

Shadows on the wall, this is all the prisoners have ever known and so they develop a language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who does the Philosopher represent?

A

An escaping prisoner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does the form of the good represent?

A

The prisoner escapes and is temporarily blinded by the sun (form of the Good),

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does the world of forms represent?

A

The real world (world of forms). He returns to the cave to explain the truth to the other prisoners, but they cannot understand him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why is experience insufficient according to Plato?

A

Experience involves mere shadows of the real and that is why it cannot give us knowledge. Only a priori reasoning involving understanding of the forms can give us knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why is empirical knowledge insufficient to Plato?

A

Evidence cannot be trusted as it is merely shadows of the real world of forms that only a priori reason can discover.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why does Ockham’s Razor relate to the theory of the forms?

A

That we should not believe explanations that are unnecessarily complicated, such as a world of forms, when we have a simpler theory that works.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did Nietzsche criticize Plato?

A

Nietzsche called Plato’s form of the good a ‘dangerous error’ and said that philosophers often invent ideas that suit their emotional prejudices, such as desire for power. They then pretend to have figured out their views through logic and reason.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is Aristotle’s view on good?

A

it is difficult to define goodness since different instances of goodness are so radically different.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is Plato’s argument from recollection?

A

Plato points out that we somehow do have knowledge of perfect, eternal and unchanging concepts. These include concepts like perfect beauty and justice. We also have perfect mathematical concepts and geometric concepts such as the idea of a perfect circle or two sticks being perfectly ‘equal’ in length. We have never experienced perfect beauty, justice or a perfect circle. So, we must have gained this knowledge a priori.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How does Plato believe we are born with concepts such as beauty and justice?

A

His answer is that we must have somehow gained these concepts before we were born. It follows that there must be a part of us (our soul) which existed in a realm where there were perfect forms.

20
Q

What is Plato?

A

A rationalist

21
Q

How is a concept of justice and beauty incorrect?

A

They seem like matters of subjective opinion, not fact. It seems to be culture that determines and conditions what a person finds beautiful or just and as a result, views on what is beautiful or just change over time and differ cross-culturally.

22
Q

How does Hume respond to the concept of justice and beauty?

A

That we can actually create the idea of perfection in our minds even if we have never experienced it. We have take our concept of ‘imperfect’ and simply conceive of its negation: ‘not imperfect’ to gain the concept of ‘perfect’.

23
Q

How does evolution relate to the world of forms and idea of perfection/

A

Evolution could have programmed us to have a sense of morality, beauty and the evolution of intelligence could explain being born with mathematical ability.

24
Q

What is Aristotle’s empirical teleology?

A

Even though the world we experience is in a state of flux, we can gain knowledge about it if we analyse and understand the causal process which explains the change that occurs.

25
Q

What is actuality?

A

Is the way something is in its current state.

26
Q

What is potentiality?

A

The way actual things could become given certain conditions. If certain conditions are met, it will change to its potentiality and that will become its actuality.

27
Q

What is the material cause?

A

What a thing is made of.

28
Q

What is the formal cause?

A

What the essence or defining characteristic of a thing is.

29
Q

What is the efficient cause?

A

What brings the being into existence.

30
Q

What is the final cause?

A

The end goal of a thing. The final state which a thing is disposed towards by its nature.

31
Q

According to Aristotle, what is a things formal cause?

A

Aristotle does not reject the idea of form itself, but only the separation of form from things. On Aristotle’s view, a thing’s form or formal cause is its essence; its defining quality that makes it what it is.

32
Q

What is the final cause of the universe?

A

The prime mover.

33
Q

What did Francis Bacon criticise Aristotle for?

A

He criticised Aristotle, claiming that final causation (telos/purpose) has no place in empirical science but is a metaphysical issue, since purpose is a divine matter.

34
Q

What does McGrath claim about science?

A

Science can tell us what the universe is like, but it cannot tell us why it is this way, nor why it exists. It cannot answer questions about purpose and therefore cannot be used to disregard the existence of purpose.

35
Q

What does Dawkins respond to McGrath with?

A

Dawkins seems to be claiming that questions of purpose also assume that existence or human life has a purpose over and above scientific explanation, but there’s no evidence for that.

36
Q

What is Sartre’s critique of telos?

A

People cling to fabricated notions of objective purpose like religion or Aristotle’s ‘final cause/telos’ because they are afraid of not having a purpose, more specifically they are scared of the intensity of the freedom that comes from having to create their own.

37
Q

What is the genetic fallacy?

A

The genetic fallacy is assuming that the way in which someone comes up with a theory is relevant to whether it is true or false. Just because people have a psychological need to believe in objective purpose, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

38
Q

What is radical freedom?

A

A sense that every choice we make is completely up to us because there is nothing in our experience like God or telos which could influence or guide that choice.

39
Q

To Aristotle, what is the defining feature of humankind?

A

The ability to reason?

40
Q

Why is it logical to assume there is a prime mover?

A

The cause of the motion of the stars and thereby all movement on earth must itself be unmoved, or its movement would require merely another mover. There cannot be an infinite chain of motion as that would never get started.

41
Q

What is a prime mover?

A

This prime mover must be unmoved and therefore cannot change. It is pure actuality. So, it cannot be material since it seems all material things are subject to change. It must be a mind, but arguably it cannot be thinking about anything happening outside itself since such things are subject to change and its thoughts would change if their object changed.

42
Q

How does the prime mover sustain the change in the world?

A

The way the prime mover sustains the change in the world must therefore be due to some sort of attraction of the things in this world to it. Things in our universe are attracted to the prime mover in a sort of orbit, moving towards a telos.

43
Q

How does Newton disprove the prime mover?

A

Newton claimed instead that when moved, an object will move until met by an equal and opposite reaction. It doesn’t just stop by itself due to rest being its natural state, as Aristotle thought. This means that Aristotle’s inference that the constant motion in the universe must be maintained by something like a prime mover is false.

44
Q

Why are neither Plato or Aristotle’s view better?

A

Aristotle’s views on formal & final causation and the prime mover are considered completely wrong by modern science, as are Plato’s views, so arguably neither are better?

45
Q

How is Aristotle’s approach scientific?

A

He believed in empirical observation which created the epistemological method.
It was Aristotle’s a posteriori approach involving empirical observation that led to Newton’s discoveries. So Newton only disproved Aristotle’s claims about reality, he did not disprove Aristotle’s a posteriori approach to understanding reality.

46
Q

What is Plato’s one over many argument?

A

Plato doesn’t see how we could recognize an object unless we already have in our mind a perfect abstract ideal of that object; an idea of ‘objectness’. Since the world of appearances is in flux, how is it that we manage to recognize different things through categorisation?

47
Q

How did Wittgenstein criticise Plato’s one over many argument

A

There is no precisely definable form or abstract ideal of a category.
We recognize a member of a category due to its family resemblances to other things in that category. The world is not a set of definable categories which the human mind can perfectly divide up. It’s not clear where the boundaries are. Humans divide the world linguistically and conceptually in a disorganised haphazard way when it is useful for us within our social context, not according to objective categories of reality.