Social Psychology Flashcards

(49 cards)

1
Q

How being social affects our behaviour

A

Conformity - Asch
Obedience - Milgram
Deindividualtion - Zajonc
Social roles - Zimbardo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Social facilitation and inhibition?

A

Triplett, zanjonc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Self fulfilling prophecies - Pygmalion effect

A

Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Hawthorne effect?

A

Landsberger, 1958 - individuals modify an aspect of their behavior in response to their awareness of being observed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Naive scientist?

A

model of social thinking - heider 1958. rational and systematic based on cause and effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fiske and Taylor (1991)?

A

Cognitive miser

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Thinking fast and slow?

A

Kahneman (2011) - two systems of thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Kruglanski (1996)

A

The motivated tactician - flexible social thinkers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Macrae, Hewstone and Griffifths, 1993?

A

Conditions promoting heuristic use - time constraints, cognitive overload, lack of information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Accessibility

A

extent to which schemas and concepts are at the forefront of people’s minds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

chronic accessibility

A

schemata activated easily for an individual across time and situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Smith, 1999

A

anchoring and adjustment - children and sweets in a jar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Yik et al (2019)

A

anchoring and adjustment for feelings - more when under time constraints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Naive diversification

A

asked to make several decisions at once, will diversify options

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Escalation of commitment

A

similar to cost sunk fallacy, justify increased investment in terms of prior investment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Kunda, 1999

A

availibility heuristic explains the perserverence of refuted beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Why do we categorise?

A

Fiske and Taylor 91991) saves us time and cognitive processing.
Hogg (2000, 2002) reduces uncertainty and provides prescriptive norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Prototypes?

A

Barsalou (1991) most representative member of a category, categorisation of less typical members may be slower or more errorful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Payne et al (2005)

A

rapidly showed pictures to students, participants more likely to rapidly misidentify a tool as a gun when preceded by a black face

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Affect as information theory?

A

affect valence - affective reactions provide a source of information about value or valence, positive or negative
Affect arousal - implicit or explicit responses - information on relevance, urgency or importance

21
Q

Forgas and Fielder (1996)

A

negative moods lead to more bottom up thinking

22
Q

Monteith, 1993

A

positive moods lead to more top down thinking

23
Q

How does heider (1958) provide the basis for attribution theory?

A

people are motivated by the need to forma coherent view of the world, and the need to gain control over the environment

24
Q

Locus of causality

A

internal attribution - locates cause as internal to the person - dispositional
external attribution - locates cause to the situation

25
Fincham and O'Leary (1983)
spousal attribution, happy and unhappy marriages
26
Weiner, 1982/5/6
stability and controllability act as additional dimensions along which attribution occurs
27
Correspondant inference theory?
Jones and davis, 1965 - people try to infer that the actions of an actor correspond to a stable charactersitic - e.g. making a daredevil
28
Kelley's Cube?
Covariation model - 1967 - consensus information, consistency information, generalisation (distinctiveness)
29
Chen, yates and McGinniews, 1988
kelleys cube generally supported but not all three types of information created equally
30
Wndschild and Wells, 1997
consistency and distinctiveness more important than consensus
31
Fundamental Attribution Error?
Ross, 1977 - tendency to make internal attributions for others' behaviour
32
Napolitan and Goetals (1979)
buying from friendly/ unfriendly cashier, even when told she was made to act that wa their dispositional attributions remained
33
Jones and Nisbett, 1972
Actor observer bias - own behaviour to external causes, others to dispositional
34
storms, 1973
2 pp as observers, 2 conversational actors.obs only focus on actor they are facing. obs attributed dispositional behaviour to actor they were watching, actors emphasised, situational - but when actors watched a video of themselves, they made internal attributes
35
Perceptual salience
why we see A-O bias, also because of information differences
36
Hewstone and Jaspers (1982)
attributional processes also apply to group situations1
37
Perpetuating the outgroup status (attribution)
Pettigrew (1979) - neg behaviour attributed internally, positive situationally
38
Neumann (2000)
the one about guilt and anger - self referent mindset = guilt, another referent = anger. guilt - internal attribution, anger - external
39
Olson and Ross (1988)
Self serving attributions
40
Walster (1966)
blaming the victim effect
41
Facial expressions: encoding?
expressing or emiting nonverbal behaviour
42
Facial expressions: decoding
interpreting the meaning of nonverbal behaviour
43
Susskind and colleagues (2008)
fear and disgust are opposites, fear enhanced perception and increased sensory input, disgust = decreased sensory input
44
Hejmadi (2000)
The Rasas in the Natyashastra, classical hindu emotions, suggest non verbal portrayal of emotions is universal
45
Keltnes (1995)
students given difficult task and made to feel embarrassed, others could tell by photos of their faces
46
Expressions and Emotions
categories v dimensions of emotions pictorial v semantic Emotions as events
47
Affect blends?
one part of the face registers as one emotion, another part as another
48
Richard and Gross (1999)
people try to hide or disguise their emotions - but findings suggest that emotion supression is a cognitively demanding form of self regulation
49
Ekman and Davidson, 1994?
cultural display rules govern what emotions people are allowed to show, affecting decoding accuracy