Social Psych Exam 3 Flashcards
Balance Theory
We are motivated to have attitudes be consistent to each other
What is the reason behind the balance theory?
The Gestalt Principles – we want to see things as a coherent whole
How to figure out if a balance triad is in balance
Multiply the signs
Cogntive dissonance
Aversive experince of inconsistency between two thoughts
cognitive dissonance theory
inconsistency is aversive, so people try to reduce dissonance to achieve consistency
What is the scope of balance thoery
Balance theory is about attitudes only
What is the scope of cognitive dissonance theory
Cognitive dissonance theory is broader, including beliefs & behavior
What is the cause of balance theory
Balance theory describes a motivation to obtain cognitive balance between attitudes & beliefs
What is the cause of cognitive dissonace theory
Cognitive dissonance theory describes an affective aversion that people are motivated to resolve.
When is cognitive dissonance likely
- Lack external reasons for our action (insufficient justification)
- Put effort into some outcome (effort justification)
- Made a choice for one thing over another (choice justification)
Insufficient Justification
When we lack sufficient external reason to explain why we did something, we intrinsically value that activity more
Effort Justification
We attribute more value to an outcome if we put more effort in obtaining that outcome (ex. hazing or boot camp)
Choice Justification
After making a choice between multiple options, we:
1. amplify the value of the choice we made
2. devalue the option(s) we didn’t choose
Beyond the 3 things, Cognitive dissonance is also more likely if
it’s self-relevant or if the inconsistency has negative consequences
4 ways to reduce cognitive dissonance
Change the belief
Change the behavior
Reinterpret with a related idea
reduce subjective imporatance
Self-perception theory
People infer their own attitudes and beliefs by observing their thoughts and behavior
Prosocial behavior
Any act performed with the goal of benefitting another person
Altruism
The desire to help another person even if it appears to involve a cost to the helper
3 motives for prosial behavior
- evolutionary psychology
- social exchange theory
- empathy-altruisim hypothesis
Evolutionary Psychology
The attempt to explain human thought and behavior in terms of genetic factors that evolved over time
Basic Tenets of Evolutionary Psychology
Genes are likely to be passed on if they:
increases chances of survival
increase chances of creating offspring
increases the survival of genetically related others
Kin Selection
Behaviors that help a genetic relative are favored by natural selection
Increasing probability of the survival of blood relatives increasing probability that their genes will be passed on
Norm of Reciprocity
The expectation that helping others will increase the likelihood they will help us in the future
Evolution favors individuals who are good team players
Evolution favors groups whose members help each other
Empathy-Altruisim Hypothesis
When we feel empathy for a person, we will attempt to help regardless of what we have to gain
Social Exchange Theory
What we do stems from desire to maximize rewards and minimize costs
we help if rewards outweight the costs
Rewards in Social Exchange Theory
The norm of reciprocity: Someone will help us if we need it
Emotions
e.g., relief of distress, increased self-worth
External Rewards
e.g., reputation
What does the lecture notes study show?
Results: In the low empathy condition, the costs affected how much people were willing to help greatly. In the high empathy condition, people were willing to help regardless of the costs.
Bystander Effect
tendency for any given bystander to be less likely to give aid if other bystanders are present
Seizure Study results
85% of solo folks helped within a minute
100% within 2.5 minutes
62% of 2-person groups helped within a minute
85% after 6 minutes
31% of 5-person groups helped within a minute
62% after 6 minutes
What did the seminary student study show
Found that 63% stopped to help when not in a hurry and only 10% when they are in a hurry
Maybe because they weren’t paying attention
What are the steps of bystander intervention
- notice the event
- interpret as an emergency
- take responsibility
- know how to help
- decide to help
pluralistic ignorance
People privately reject a norm/belief
They perceive that other members of the group accept it.
This causes them to accept it as well.
What did the smoke filled room study show
Alone – 75% alerted experimenter in 6min
Groups – 38% alerted experimenter in 6min
Diffusion of Responsibility
each bystander’s sense of responsibility to help decreases as the number of witnesses increases
Self-esteem
Evaluation of one’s own self-worth
An attitude toward one’s self
State self esteem
Situational evaluation of your self-worth
Susceptible to what’s happening right now
Trait self esteem
General evaluation of your self-worth
Your overall sense of how you’re doing
Central Features of Attitudes
Evaluative
Relatively enduring in nature
readiness to respond
learned from experience
represented in memory
What percent of people report lower than the midpoint in self-esteem
7%
High self esteem is related to
Better grades
Being more happy
Less stress
Living longer
More likely to start new relationships
Work harder when confronted with adversity
When does self esteem hit its peak
Age 51
Across cultures, who has higher self esteem and why
Across cultures, men/boys have higher self-esteem than women/girls
Potential causes:
Social roles
Sexism
Implicit Self-Esteem
Attitudes toward one’s self outside of conscious awareness or control
Weakly related to explicit self-esteem
What is the name letter effect
Liking things that share our first initial more
When did the self esteem movement start
The 1970s
Why did the 1986 self esteem initiave fail
Correlation does not equal causation!!
Instead self-esteem might be the effect of positive social living, rather than the cause
Sociometer Theory
Self-esteem is a psychological gauge of whether we are socially accepted by others
Included or excluded
Fitting in or not
Narrative Identity
Internalized and evolving story of the self.
Reconstructs the past
Anticipates the future
Provides unity, meaning, and purpose
Autobiographical Reasoning
Making conclusions about the self from analyzing one’s own experiences.
Disposition
Traits, stable behavioral characteristics
Values
Morality, right and wrong
Outlook
Attitudes, perspectives on the world
Personal Growth
Maturing, developing confidence & strength
Redemptive Narratives
Track the move from suffering to an enhanced status or state.
Common within the United States
Generally supports happiness & societal engagement
BUT…can lead to unrealistic expectations that future will be better
Rouge Test
The rouge test is a measure of self-concept; the child who touches the rouge on his own nose upon looking into a mirror demonstrates the basic ability to understand self-awareness.
Introspection
The process whereby people look inward and examine their own thoughts, feelings, and motives
How is introspection limited
People do not rely on this source of information as often as you might think
Even when they do, the reasons for their feelings and behavior can be hidden from conscious awareness
Self Awareness Theory
The idea that when people focus their attention on themselves, they evaluate and compare their behavior to their internal standards and values
we become objective evaluators of ourselves
What did the shock experiement show
people would rather give themselves shocks than sit by themselves with only their thoughts
Illusion of Transparency
People overestimate the degree to which their personal mental state is known to others
People think they appear more nervous than others actually report
In other words, we feel “see-through”, as though others can see our nervousness
Affective Forecasting
People’s predictions about their emotional reactions to future events
Impact Bias
We tend to overestimate the strength and duration of our emotional reactions
Social Comparsion
The process by which people compare their own characteristics to those of others
How many self comparisons do people make per week on average
10
Ways to compare ourselves against others
Similarity
Relationship Closeness
Relevance
Downward Social Comparison
Comparing ourselves to people who are worse than we are on a characteristic
Upward social comparsion
Comparing ourselves to people who are better than we are on a characteristic
What did the role model study show
They found that relatability mattered a lot and that if the leader seemed relatable and attainable then you thought of yourself as a leader more
What is the main point of the role model study
For role models to motivate people, they should be percieved as relatable
Who should we compare ourselves to if we want accurate information
Similiar people
Bask in Reflected Glory (BIRG):
Associating ourselves with successful self-relevant people
Cut off Reflected Failure (CORF):
Distancing ourselves from low-status self-relevant people
Better than Average Effect
The tendency to overestimate your own desirable qualities & abilities relative to other people
What types of things is the better than average effect shown in
IQ
Memory
Academic performance
Driving ability
Health
Personality
Sociability
Popularity
Satisfaction with romantic relationship
Teaching ability
Leadership ability