Social Influence: Types Of Confotmity Flashcards
Conformity is…
Giving in to group pressures. Happens when someone adopts the beliefs, behaviours or attitudes of a group due to real or imagined pressures.
Compliance is…
Type of conformity - a person changes behaviours in public to match a group but they don’t change privately
Identification is…
Type of conformity - a person changes publically to fit in with the group but do it because they admire the group and wish to be a part of it
Internalisation is…
Type of conformity - a person changes behaviours to match the group but changes they’re behaviour outside of the group, changes to behaviour usually long lasting
Information Social Influence is…
Explanation to conformity - when we are uncertain we look to see what others are doing and copy it in order to be right, likely to result in internalisation
Normative Social Influence is…
Explanation of conformity - when we conform to a group to gain acceptance, when we think a group can reward us or reject us. Results in compliance
The aim of Asch’s study (1951) is…
To see if participants would conform to majority social influence and give incorrect answers on a task, even when the correct answer is obvious
The method of Asch’s study (1951) is…
123 male American students, recruited using volunteer sampling technique, were asked to take part in a vision test. Participants shown two cards one with the ‘standard line’ and the other with three lines. All participants asked to which line was the same as the ‘standard line’ and the correct answer was always obvious. All participants except one were confederates and the genuine participant had to call out their answer last after every confederate answered and purposefully said the wrong answer on 12 out of 18 of the trials.
The results of Asch’s study (1951) were…
36.8% of participants gave a wrong answer on the critical trials. 25% of participants did not conform on any trials, 75% conformed at least once. When interviewed after most said they conformed to avoid rejection.
Asch concluded…
Participants exhibited a ‘distortion of action’ - they knew what the right answer was but conformed to the majority to avoid ridicule
Evaluation: limited sample
Asch’s research has low population validity. Asch’s participants were American male students so could be gender bias and not representative of female behaviour. Limitation of Asch’s study because his results can’t be generalised to the behaviours of others.
Evaluation: Artificial situation and task
Low ecological validity. Participants knew they were in a research study so maybe just went along with what they thought was expected (demand characteristics). Task of making judgements about lines with strangers doesn’t reflect real life conformity. Limitation because results can’t be generalised to real life situations of conformity (low external validity)
Evaluation: high control
Asch’s study uses the experimental method so has control over extraneous variables. In lab experiments the researcher can be sure it’s the IV that is causing the DV. Strength because results about conformity are not affected by confounding variables (internal validity)
Evaluation: ethical issues
There are ethical issues in Asch’s procedure. Asch deceived his participants because they were not aware that the other participants were confederates and they could not provide fully informed consent. Limitation because it goes against the current BPS ethical guidelines for conducting psychological research.
Variables affecting conformity: Group size
6 confederates, 1 participant = 36.8% vs 1 confederate, 1 participant = 4% conformity
6 confederates, 1 participant = 36.8% vs 3 confederates, 1 participant = 31.8% conformity
Suggests that as group size increases levels of conformity increase