Memory: Multi-store Model Evaluation

Question 1

Multi-store memory model strength: seperate IS supported by research

Answer 1

Real life case study of Clive Wearing. His STM was working but his LTM was damaged which supports that the stores are separate. The model is a valid explanation of memory.

Question 2

Multi-store memory model limitation: unitary NOT supported by research

Answer 2

Clive Wearing has some long term memories but not others which suggests it’s not a unitary store meaning the model may not be a valid explanation of how memory works.

Question 3

Multi-store model limitation: flash bulb memories

Answer 3

Overemphasises the role of rehearsal in forming long-term memories. People don’t need rehearsal to remember flash bulb memories e.g. first day of Covid lockdown. Suggest msm isn’t a valid explanation

Question 4

Multi-store model limitation: contradicted by the working memory model.

Answer 4

STM is no longer a single store. Working memory model shows STM to be made up of three seperate components. Model not a valid explanation.