social influence - social influence and social change Flashcards
what is social change?
the wats in which a society develops over time to replace beliefs, attitudes, and behaviour with new norms and expectations
what lessons can be drawn from minority social influence research
- drawing attention and social proof
- consistency
- deeper processing
- augmentation principle
- snowball effect
- social cryptomnesia
what is social cryptomnesia?
people know change occurred but don’t remember how it happened
what lessons can be drawn from conformity research?
Asch’s variation (1955) shows that dissent has the power to bring about social change by allowing others to resist conformity
campaigns appeal to normative social influence by providing information about what others are doing
what lessons can be drawn from obedience research?
Milgram’s variation demonstrates the importance of a disobedient role model
Zimbardo (2007) suggested that obedience can create social change through gradual commitment
what is gradual commitment?
once a small instruction os obeyed, it becomes more difficult to resist a bigger one
strength - research support for normative influence
Nolan et al (2008)
- hung messages on front doors in San Diego for a month that other residents were trying to reduce their energy usage
- control group also had signs but with no reference to the behaviour of others
- significant decrease in energy usage in he first group compared to controls
limitation - social norms don’t always create social change
Foxcroft et al (2015)
- reviewed 70 studies where social norms approach was used to reduce student alcohol use
- small reduction in quantity, no change to drinking frequency
strength - minority influence explains change
Nemeth (2009) claims social change is due to a type of thinking minorities inspire.
- when people consider minority arguments, they engage in divergent thinking which stimulated new ideas and creates more creative solutions to social issues
limitation - counter-evidence for role of deeper processing
Mackie (1987) suggests majority influence creates deeper processing if you don’t share their view as you are forced to think hard about their arguments and reasoning