social influence - conformity Flashcards

1
Q

what is conformity?

A

when someone changes their behaviour or beliefs due to real or imagined pressure from others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what was Asch’s baseline procedure (1951)?

A

he wanted to assess the extent to which people conform even in an unambiguous situation

one participant per group, the others were confederates.
They were given the task of comparing the lengths of lines.
Confederates gave the wrong answer and the conformity of the participant was measured (whether of not they agreed with the confederates)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what were the findings from Asch’s baseline study (1951)?

A

participants conformed to the majority 36.8% of the time

25% never conformed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what variables did Asch study (1955)?

A

group size

unanimity

task difficulty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how did Asch study group size (1955)?

A

varied the number of confederates from 1 to 15

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what were Asch’s findings for group size?

A

curvilinear relationship - conformity increased with group size until 31.8% with 3 confederates, after which it soon levelled off

suggests most people are sensitive to the view of others as just 1 or 2 confederates was enough to sway opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how did Asch investigate unanimity (1955)?

A

included a dissenter in the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what were Asch’s findings for unanimity?

A

the presence of a dissenter caused participants to conform less

the dissenter freed the participant to behave more independently

suggests that the influence of the majority depends largely on their unanimity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how did Asch study task difficulty (1955)?

A

made the stimulus and comparison lines more similar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what were Asch’s findings for task difficulty?

A

conformity increased as the situation became more ambiguous, so participants looked for guidance on the right answer (ISI)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

limitations of Asch’s study

A

artificial tasks

participants knew they were in a study, may have responded to demand characteristics.
Fiske (2014) suggested the groups didn’t resemble groups in real life

gender and culture bias

only studied American men - ethnocentric and androcentric.
replications in collectivist cultures showed higher rates of conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

strength of Asch’s study

A

Lucas et al (2006) asked participants to solve maths problems and were given fake answers from other students. Participants conformed when the problems were harder

counterpoint - Lucas et al found conformity to be complex due to individual differences - participants with higher confidence in their maths ability conformed less

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

who suggested the 3 types of conformity and what are they?

A

Kelman (1958)

internalisation
identification
compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is internalisation?

A

deepest type of conformity

the individual changes both their public behaviour and private beliefs

long-term change

often the result of ISI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is identification?

A

moderate type of conformity

the individual conforms to the group because they value it and want to be a part of it

doesn’t necessarily agree with all their beliefs - public change, private attitudes may not change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is compliance?

A

superficial and temporary type of conformity

change in public behaviour but not private beliefs

often the result of NSI

17
Q

who proposed ISI and NSI as an explanation for conformity?

A

Deutsch and Gerard (1955)

18
Q

what is informational social influence (ISI)?

A

an individual follows the majority due to a desire to be right

a cognitive process

leads to permanent change in behaviour - internalisation

most likely to happed in ambiguous or new situations

19
Q

what is normative social influence (NSI)?

A

an individual conforms to the majority due to a desire to be liked and gain social approval

an emotional process

leads to temporary change in behaviour - compliance

can occur with strangers or people we know

may be more pronounced in stressful situations due to greater need for social support

20
Q

strength of NSI

A

research support from Asch’s study

he interviewed participants, some of whom said they conformed because they were afraid of disapproval.
when participants wrote down their answers, conformity fell to 12.5% because privately answering removed normative social pressure

21
Q

limitation of NSI

A

individual differences

nAffiliators are people greatly concerned with being liked by others.
McGhee and Teevan (1967) found that students who were nAffiliators were more likely to conform

22
Q

strength of ISI

A

research support from Lucas et al (2006)

participants conformed more when the questions were difficult.
the situation became ambiguous and they participant didn’t want to be wrong, so relied on the answers of others

23
Q

limitation of ISI and NSI

A

difficult to differentiate

Asch (1955) found conformity reduced when there is a dissenter
dissenter could reduce power of NSI - provide social support.
dissenter could reduce power of ISI - provide alternative source of social information

24
Q

what are social roles?

A

the roles people play as members of various social groups.
Conformity to these roles is when an individual adopts a particular behaviour and belief while in a certain social situation

25
why did Zimbardo study conformity to social roles (1973)?
there had been prison riots in America Zimbardo wanted to know why prison guards behaved so brutally - sadistic personalities or social role?
26
how did Zimbardo set up the Standford Prison Experiment?
set up a mock prison in the basement of the psychology department in Stanford University selected 21 male student volunteers who tested as 'emotionally stable' participants were randomly assigned a role as prisoner or guard
27
how did uniform encourage participants to conform in the SPE?
prisoners given loose smock and cap, identified by number rather than names guards' uniform reflected their status, had a wooden club, handcuffs, and mirrored shades de-individuation - loss of personal identity, meant they were more likely to conform to their social role
28
how did instructions encourage participants to conform to their roles in the SPE?
prisoners were encouraged by having to 'apply for parole' rather than leave the study early guards were encouraged through reminders of their complete power over prisoners
29
what were the findings of the SPE?
guards were harsh - reminded prisoners of their powerlessness, created opportunities to enforce rules and administer punishments prisoners rebelled, though that was soon stopped - after that they became subdued, depressed, and anxious - one had to be released early due to symptoms of psychological disturbance - one went on hunger strike guards became increasingly brutal and aggressive Zimbardo had to shut down the study after 6 days rather than 14
30
what were Zimbardo's conclusions about social roles?
social roles appear to have a strong influence on an individual's behaviour guards became brutal, prisoners became submissive
31
strength of SPE - control
controlled experiment participants were randomly assigned their role, which controlled for individual personality differences. This meant the behaviour they displayed must be the result of the roles increases the validity of the study
32
limitation of SPE - lack of realism
Banuazizi and Movahedi (1975) - participants were play-acting and their performances were based on stereotypes one of the guards claimed he based his role on a brutal character from the film 'Cool Hand Luke'
33
strength of SPE - evidence participants did believe
90% of prisoners' conversations were about prison life one prisoner explained that he believed the prison was real, but run by psychologists rather than the government
34
limitation of SPE - exaggeration of the power of roles
only 1/3 of the guards were brutal. another third tried to be fair. others tried to help the prisoners. most guards were able to resist situational pressures to conform
35
limitation of SPE - culture and gender bias
only studied male participants. - androcentric participants were all men studying at Stanford University - Henrich's idea of WEIRD people most likely to be studied, ethnocentric