social influence advanced information Flashcards
what was milgrams procedure
40 participants recruited through newspaper adverts.
Confederate “Mr Wallace” was the learner while participant was teacher.
The learned had to match word pairs.
Shocks began at 15 volts up to 450 volts.
Milgram had four prods to encourage the teacher to carry on the last one was “you have no other choice you must go on”.
what were Milgram’s findings
No participants stopped below 300 volts.
12.5% stopped at 300 volts.
65% continued to 450 volts.
what are the strengths of milgrams study to do with good external validity
Good external validity. Lab environment reflect wider authority situations in real life. This suggests that findings can be generalised.
what is a limitation of Milgram’s study to do with low internal validity
Low internal validity. Later tapes of Milgram’s study were listened to and participants expressed doubt about the shocks being real. Therefore they did not behave as they would’ve in real life.
how did proximity affect obedience in milgrams variations.
Teacher and learner in the same room obedience fell to 40%.
Teacher forces learners hand onto plate obedience falls to 30%.
Experimenter gives orders over telephone obedience falls to 20.5%.
how did location affect obedience in milgrams variations.
study done in rundown building obedience fell to 47.5%
how did uniform affect obedience in Milgram’s variations.
When experimenter role was played by someone in ordinary clothes obedience was 20%.
what are the limitations of Milgram’s variations to do with lack of internal validity
Lack of internal validity. Member of the public being experimenter in uniform variation. Participants may have saw through deception and acted differently.
what are the strengths of Milgram’s variations to do with research support by Bickman
Research support. Bickman found pedestrians were more likely to obey someone in security guard uniform than jacket and tie. This supports Milgram’s conclusion of uniform can affect obedience.
What is agentic state
Where we act as an agent for an authority figure and feel no personal responsibility for our actions. Freed from our own conscience. Opposite of autonomous state.
what is autonomous state
Where we are independent and free. The opposite of agentic state. Going from autonomous to agentic state is called agentic shift.
what are binding factors as part of agentic state
Aspects of a situation that allow a person to ignore the damaging effect of their behaviour. Reduce moral strain.
what is legitimacy of authority as an explanation of obedience
Idea we are more likely to obey someone we perceive as having authority over us. Justified by position in social hierarchy.
what is destructive authority
The fact some people with legitimate authority can use it for destructive purposes like Hitler.
What are the limitations of Agentic shift to with obedience alibi for Nazis in Poland
Obedience alibi. Behaviour of Nazis cannot be explained by agentic state. Nazis shot civilians in poland despite not having direct orders.
Limited explanation. Does not explain why some participants did not obey in Milgrams study for example. Therefore agentic shift only accounts for some situations of obedience.
how does the My Lai massacre support agentic state and legitimacy of authority
Agentic state. Free from conscience. Able to carry out destructive orders such as destroying the village. Supports the agentic state theory.
Legitimacy of authority. Soldiers following orders from superiors above in military hierarchy. Carry out their orders. Supports legitimacy of authority.
What are the strengths of legitimacy of authority to do with accounting for obedience in different cultures
Useful account of obedience in different cultures. Australia is lower compared to Germany. Shows in some cultures authority is more likely to be perceived as legitimate. Therefore allows obedience to be explored in different cultures.
what is the authoritarian personality
Personality type susceptible to obeying. Submissive to superiors and dismissive of inferiors. View society as going to the dogs.