Social Influence Flashcards
(A03)
What is the effects of levels of education in authoritarian personality
Research suggests a less educated person is more authoritarian than a well educated person
Suggesting authoritarian personalities is about levels of education rather than personalities
(A03)
What was the effect of locus of control on independent behaviour in resisting social influence
Interviews 2 groups of non-Jews who lived through the holocaust
They asked them if they protected the Jews from the nazis or not
The group that did rescue had internal locus of control
However interviews aren’t the best form of research
- person may lie for social desirability
- demand characteristics
-may cause psychological harm to remember
Supports locus of control as people took matters into their own hands
(A01)
What is consistency in social influence
The more consistent the argument the more it will be considered
The majority doesn’t understand the minority’s viewpoint
It creates internal conflict and anxiety
To reduce the minority’s anxiety the majority examines the minority’s argument
(A03)
What effect did Wood et al have on consistency in social influence
Conducted a meta analysis of 97 minority groups and influence
Whichever remained the most consistent had the most influence
However they can’t establish cause and effect as there could be another factor affecting influence
(A01)
What were the different variations of Milgram’s experiment
Location - from Yale University —> run down office block - removes prestige, status and trust - 65% to 48% Proximity - authoritative figure giving orders over the phone = 20% - learner in the same room = 40% Costume - removing the lab coat removes legitimacy = 20% Situational variables - hand on shock plate = 30% - learner isn’t seen or heard = 100%
(A01)
What were the reasons for conforming in Asch’s study
Distortion of perception
- participants perceived the line differently
Distortion of judgement
- feelings of doubt about their judgement
Distortion of action
- many trusted their judgement but changed their answer to avoid disapproval
(A01)
What is right winged authoritarianism in authoritarian personality
Altmeyer suggested there were 3 personality variables
Is a person scored high on the rwa they are more likely to over
3 personalities
- conventionalism = adhereance towards norms and values
- authoritarian submission = submissing to authoritarian personalities
- authoritarian aggression = an agressive feeling towards people who violate norms
(A01)
What was the aim for Zimbardo’s prison experiment
To assess how people conform to simulated prison life
In a role playing excersise
(A03)
What was the effect of cultural differences in obedience
Kilham and Mann (1974) replicated Milgram’s study in Australia
Where there is a tradition of challenging authority
Only 16% went to 450 volts
Mantell, replicated Milgram’s study in Germany
Where many people accept the authority
85% went to 450 volts
(A01)
What was the aim of Milgram’s experiment
Investigated how the situational context could lead to people inflicting harm on others
What is informative influence
People conform because they are uncertain about what to do in a certain situation
They look at others for guidance
Leads to internalisation
(A03)
What evidence did Blass and Schmitt provide for the agentic state
They showed people a video of Milgram’s study without them knowing what the experiment was about
They asked who was responsible for inflicting harm on the learner
They blamed the experimenter not the teacher
(A01)
What is legitimacy of authority
Social hierarchies are accepted in day to day life
We accept that some people can punish others
Destructive authority = abusing their power of authority
(A01)
What was the effect of the variation of Asch’s study when changing the unanimity of the group
Participants joined by another real participant or unaffected confederate
- conformity = 32% -> 5.5%
Dissenter gave a different incorrect answer
- conformity = 32% -> 9%
Asch concluded ; breaking the general agreement of the group is important in reducing conformity
(A01)
What is flexibility in social influence
The minority must show leeway
They can’t force their ideas as they are powerless
They negotiate though flexibility
Being too rigid = dogmatic
Being too flexible = inconsistent or weak
Some flexibility is better than none
(A03)
What was the effect of demand characteristics in Milgram’s experiment
The participants may have guessed the shocks weren’t real
(A03)
What is research support for resisting social influence
Replication of Asch’s study and found conformity decreased when one decametre even if they wore glasses or had bad eyesight
Despite glasses and bad sight not being the strongest support it still broker the majority
The pressure to conform is reduced by a role model giving confidence
(A03)
What were the strengths / weaknesses of Zimbardo’s experiment
Validity
- true representation if they knew it was an experiment
Demand characteristics
- if the participants saw the cameras or guessed the aim of the study it could influence their behaviour making the findings inaccurate : evidence of guessing the aim = people who didn’t know what the study was were asked what the aim was and answered correctly
Gender bias
- all male participants making the results generalisable
(A01)
What were the findings in Zimbardo’s experiment
The study was meant to last 2 weeks but had to end after 6 days Guards behaviours - brutal and sadistic - tormenting : forced the prisoners to clean toilets and urniated on the prisoners - willingly worked extra shifts Prisoners behaviour - taking the rules seriously - after submissivly - sided and were dependant on the guards Prisoners during/ post symptoms - emotional disorders - crying - screaming - depression - angry outbursts
What are the 2 reasons for conformity
Normative influence
Informative influence
(A03)
What is the weakness of ethics in Asch’s study
Deception
The participants didn’t know the real purpose of the study
May feel stupid or embarrassed after
(A03)
What were the real life applications of social influence
It can help understand how terrorism radicalises people to join
Consistency and persistence is evident through bombing and shooting
Also demonstrates how committed people are as they are sacrificing their lives and forcing people to take notice (suicide bombs)
However it may not always lead to change as terrorists may be seen as deviant due to their beliefs or the measures they take
(A01)
What are weaknesses for social change
Difficult process for the minority to change the majority
Influence may be seen as latent (potential for the future)
May be seen as deviant by the majority
(A01)
What was the effect of validity in Milgram’s experiment
Internal validity was high as the participant believed the shocks were real
External validity was high due to replications in real life
- 21/22 nurses obeyed a doctors order over the phone despite it being illegal
What are the 3 types of conformity
Compliance
Internalisation
Identification