Social Influence Flashcards
What was Moscovici et al’s experiment procedure?
4 naïve participants and 2 confederates
Shown a series of blue slides that varied only in intensity
Asked to judge the colour of the slide shown
Inconsistent and consistent conditions
For a minority group to win, what three things must they show?
Consistency, commitment and flexibility
What were the findings of Moscovici et al’s study?
In the inconsistent condition, the minority exerted very little influence and did not differ significantly from the control group.
In the consistent condition, participants called green over 8% of the trials.
What are the 3 types of conformity?
Compliance, Internalisation and Identification
What is Compliance?
Where individuals go along with a group in order to gain the majority’s approval or avoid their disapproval. They agree publicly but not privately.
What is internalisation?
Individuals go along with the group because of an acceptance of their views. They examine their own beliefs, and this can lead to acceptance of the groups point of view both publicly and privately.
What is identification?
An individual will accept influence because they want to be associated with another person or group. Has elements of both compliance and identification. Accepting terms as right/true to fit in.
Name 2 explanations for conformity
Normative social influence and informational social influence.
What is Normative Social Influence?
NSI is where a person will go along with the majority without really accepting their point of view. Similar to compliance. Going along to avoid rejection.
What is Informational Social Influence?
ISI is when an individual accepts information from others as evidence about reality. ISI is more likely if the situation is ambiguous.
What was the procedure of Asch’s experiment?
123 male undergraduates tested. Asked to judge the length of a ‘standard line’ against three ‘comparison lines’. The real participant was always answering second to last.
What were the findings of Asch’s study?
The average conformity rate was 33%.
Name 3 variables affecting conformity
Group size, unanimity of the majority and difficulty of the task.
Who conducted the ‘Stanford Prison Experiment’?
Zimbardo
What was Zimbardo’s procedure in the SPE?
A mock prison set up in the basement of the psychology dept. 24 mentally stable male student volunteers randomly assigned prisoner or guard, given uniform. Planned to last 2 weeks.
What were the findings of Zimbardo’s research?
Guards became increasingly abusive towards prisoners. Prisoners became passive. Participants appeared at times to forget that this was only a psychological study. 5 prisoners were released early due to extreme reactions. The study was stopped after 6 days.
What are the problems with Zimbardo’s research?
ETHICS! Demand characteristics, lack of population validity.
What real life application supports Zimbardo’s research?
Abu Ghraib.
Military personnel abused prisoners of war, most likely due to lack of training. Results were similar to that of the SPE.
Give examples of situational factors in obedience
Proximity, Location, Uniform
What is the procedure of Milgram’s study?
40 participants involved. One participant was the ‘teacher’ and a confederate was the ‘learner’. Introduced to each other. Told it was an experiment about learning.
Teacher told to administer shocks to the learner. Experimenter had a series of ‘prods’ (phrases) to repeat to encourage the participant to continue.
What were the findings of Milgram’s study?
65% of participants gave shocks to the full 450 volts.
All participants have 300 volt shocks.
In Milgram’s proximity study, how was the rate of obedience effected?
Obedience levels fell 40% as the teacher now had to experience the learners anguish more directly.
In Milgram’s location study, what happened to the rate of conformity?
Location changed to a run down office, where obedience fell to 48% of participants giving the maximum voltage.
What are the problems associated with Milgram’s study?
Ethics- psychological harm, lack of informed consent, the right to withdraw was not allowed.
Internal validity - lack of realism.
Demand characteristics- may have realised it is fake, some people laughing etc.
What explanation can be used to suggest why guards in the SPE and teachers in Milgram’s study continued to knowingly harm others?
Buffers. The participant believes they will not be held responsible for any injury to the others as the responsibility is passed on to a higher authority, or the person giving the orders.
Define the ‘agentic state’
A person sees himself or herself as an agent for carrying out another persons wishes.