Social Influence Flashcards
What is compliance?
It involves changing your behaviour at the request of another person.
It does not rely on a power differential.
What is obedience?
It is a form of social influence that involves performing an action under the orders of an authority figure.
It requires a direct request from an authority figure.
There is a punishment and a consequence.
What is conformity?
Altering your attitudes and behaviour to go along with the rest of the group.
Influence of authority is indirect.
If this does not happen the individual may be ignored or marginalised.
What three factors impact obedience?
Proximately
Prestige
Deindividuation
Describe the impact of proximity on obedience…
It is easier to resist the orders from an authority figure if they are not too close by.
Describe the impact of prestige on obedience…
Higher levels of perceived prestige are associated with increased obedience.
Describe the impact of deindividuation on obedience…
Losing your individuality, your ability to think and make decisions for yourself - going along with group behaviour.
What type of designs have been used to study obedience?
Experimental designs, they ensure the experimenter is able to manipulate an the independent variable and observe the changes in the dependent variable, clearly testing the cause and effect.
What are the advantages of an experimental design?
- Demonstrates causal relationships.
- Can be replicated/repeated to see if the same findings emerge.
- Maximises control over relevant variables.
What are the disadvantages to experimental designs?
- Generalisability outside the laboratory.
- Some complex phenomena cannot be readily tested using pure experimental methods.
- Ethical issues present challenges for testing some naturally occurring phenomena
Describe Milgram’s experiment…
Conducted at yale, the results shocked the researchers and general public.
There was a student, teacher and examiner. The examiner had a script asking the student questions and if they got it wrong the teacher was directly instructed to shock them. Increasing the voltage as time went on. However, the teacher did not know that the student was an actor who was not being shocked. And the teachers were experimented on, to see how far they would go knowing they are injuring another person, possibly killing them.
What were the results of Milgram’s Experiment?
- 65% of participants continued to the highest level of 450 volts.
- All participants continued to 300 volts.
- Prior to the experiment, psychology students, psychiatrist and colleagues were asked to predicts obedience levels - consensus was that most people would not obey and only shock to 150 volts.
- Milgram’s concluded that people have a tendency to obey orders, even if it goes against their morals.
- Situational factors rather than dispositional factors influence the ability for someone to make independent decisions when they find themselves in a subordinate position.
What are the ethical issues with Milgram’s research?
- Psychological harm and distress: participants were placed under significant emotional strain, causing psychological damage. Several participants had marks on their hands from digging their nails in, other were visibly sweating and trembling. Three participant had seizures.
- Right to without: Milgram’s informed participants they could withdraw at the starts, but then advised them differently whilst they were completing the experiment.
- Deception: Milgram’s stated the aim of the study was regarding the role of punishment and learning, rather than Obedience to authority. Participants were made to believe they were administering electric shocks.
Describe Stanford’s Prison Experiment…
- Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment showed how powerful the demands of roles and the situations can be on individual behaviour.
- 22 male Stanford University student volunteers played the roles of prisoners and guards in the simulated prison.
- Students designated as prisoners were arrested at their homes and searched, handcuffed, fingerprinted and booked at a police station.
- These students were blindfolded, driven to a simulated prison where they were stripped, sprayed with deodorant spray and told to stand naked and alone in a cell with two other prisoners.
- The guards were free to devise their own rules - the only prohibition was against physical punishment.
- The experiment was meant to last two weeks, however it only lasted six days.
- The study was a powerful demonstration of the way roles structure people’s behaviour and ultimately their emotions, attitudes and even their identities.
What were the results of the Stanford Prison Experiment?
- Deindividuation quickly occurred with both the guards and the prisoners.
- The participants lost their sense of self, alongside the reality that they were in fact participants in a psychological experiment.
- After six days of emotional distress, the experiment came to an end when a PhD student raised concerns about the ethical nature of the study. Zimbardo wanted the study to continue.
- Situational factors, rather than dispositional factors, play a significant roles in the behaviours exhibited at any given time particularly where strong stereotypes exist.
Zimbardo later noted ‘…much later I realised how far into my prison role I was at the point - I was thinking like a prison superintendent rather than a research psychologist’.
What are the ethical considerations with Standford prison experiment?
- Lack of fully informed consent
- Abuse of participants, psychologically, physically and emotionally.
- Lack of appropriate debriefings.
What are the two things that conformity is influenced by?
- The opinions, judgements or actions of other people
- The normative standards of a social group or situation.
Why do psychologists deem conformity as a powerful force?
- People wish to stand out, but only in a good or desirable manner. We want to be recognised for our achievements, unique qualities but now if we are wearing clothing that has gone out of style or are ignorant of the latest cultural trends.
- People want to be seen as individuals, but not in way that would make use seem weird or different to others - this fuels the drive to conform as we desire to fit in.
- Conformity is found to be higher in collectivist than individualistic cultures.
What are the three reasons an individual conforms?
- Normative social influence
- Informational social influence
- Individual differences impact conformity
What is normative social influence and conformity?
It is when a person conforms to be accepted or belong to a group.
Normative is changing yourself to fit in with the group of choice.
There are two types of this - compliance and identification.
Compliance - when people change their public behaviour but not their private beliefs.
Identification - when people change their public behaviour and their private beliefs.
This is usually is a short-term solution which is because of the desire to fit in.
Compliance can lead to identification.
What is Informational social influence and conformity?
When a person conforms to gain knowledge, or because they believe that someone else is ‘right’.
The person changes their public behaviour and their private beliefs on a semi-permanent.
What is individual differences and how does it impact conformity?
Ambiguity and unanimity are powerful contributors to the incidence of conformity, they are not the sole indicators.
Personal characteristics and the individual position/familiarity within a group also play a role.
Personality and cultural factors also influence the likelihood that people will conform to the social norms around them.
What is compliance?
When an individual publicly changes their behaviour to be more like the majority, but do not privately change our minds about what we believe or how we would like to act.
What is identification?
When an take on the views of an individual or group we admire.
It is where a person changes their public behaviour and private beliefs but only while they are in the presence of the group.