Social Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Conformity

A

changes in individuals behaviours and or beliefs because of real or imagined group pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Compliance

A

most superficial and least permanent
publicly change beliefs and behaviours
privately revert back when group pressure stops
linked to NSI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Identification

A

possible private aswell as public acceptance
look to group for guidance and adjust their behaviour and belief systems because membership of group id desireable
when the group is no onger seen as valuable may revert back

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Internalisation

A

deepest and most permanent change
publicly and privately change behaviours and beliefs
accept groups attitudes into own cognitions (internalise them)
behaviour lasts when majority no longer present.
linked to ISI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explanations of conformity- ISI

A

Driven by desire to be right
individual lacks knowledge about how to behave, seeks info from group about how to behave and assumes this is right
cognitive process
leads to internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explanations of confomity- NSI

A

desire to be liked
individual goes along with groups behaviour to avoid ridicule and gain acceptance from them and fit in
emotional process
leads to compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

AO3 of explanations of conformity

A

-lacks ecological validity, artificial environment
RTS- gender bias, onky males tested
-RTS ISI- Jenness, jelly beans
RTS- NSI- Asch (a,b,c closest to x, confederates answer first with wrong answer, ppts conformed 37% of time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Asch’s conformity research

A

-lab experiment
-123 american male students
-ppts individually placed into groups with 7-9 confederates
shown two cards, one with standard line x and other comparison lines abc
-one line was the same, others clearly different
-ppts always last or second to last to answer
-37% of time conformed
supports NSI- public not private

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Variables affecting conformity

A

Group size
Unanimity
Task difficulty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Variables affecting conformity- Group size

A

Conformity rates increase as majority group increases

In variation study:
-one real ppt, one confederate- conformity 3%
-two confederates, one ppt- conformity 13%
-three confederates, one ppt- conformity 32%
size of majority has an effect up to a certain point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Variables affecting conformity- Unanimity

A

Complete agreement from a group about an answer or viewpoint

In variation study:
-one confederate gave correct answer, conformity dropped to 5.5%
-‘lone’ confederate diff answer to majority and correct, conformity dropped to 9%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Variables affecting conformity- Task difficulty

A

Conformity increases when difficulty of a task increases

In variation study:
-difficulty increased, conformity increased
-ISI plays a greater role when task is harder
-right answer less obvious lose confidence in ability,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Variables affecting conformity AO3

A

RTS- Lucas et al, easy and hard maths questions
-gender bias
-culture bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Conformity to social roles- Zimbardo

A

volunteer sample of 24 ‘emotionally stable’ US male university students
-randomly allocated to prisoners and guards
-prisoners arrested at homes, taken to prison, searched, deloused and dressed in smock, referred to by number
-guards given uniforms, a night stick, mirrored glasses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Conformity to social roles- Zimbardo findings

A

day 1 riot- prisoners rebelled and pulled numbers off, guards locked them in cells and confiscated blankets
-punishment by guards escalated as experiment continued, prisoners were humiliated and deprived of sleep
-prisoners referred to each other and themself by their numbers
-prisoners became subdued, depressed and stressed, 3 were released early due to psychological disturbance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Zimbardo and conformity to social roles AO3

A

-high control over extraneous variables
-gender bias male only sample
-major ethical issues
-prone to demand characteristics

17
Q

Obedience - Milgram

A

lab experiment at yale uni
40 american males aged 20-50
Advert in newspaper for experiment on ‘memory on learning’
Teacher (ppt)- administrate learning task and deliver electric shocks to learner if they got question wrong
Shocks began at 15V - 450V
Researcher used promps if teacher refused:
‘please continue’
‘experiment requires you continue’
‘absolutely essential you continue’
‘you have no choice you must go on’

18
Q

Milgram- obedience research findings

A

-All ppts went to atleast 300V
12.5% stopped at 300V
- 65% continued to 450V

19
Q

Situational variables affecting obedience

A

proximity, location, uniform

20
Q

Situational variables affecting obedience- Proximity

A

Variation:teacher and learner in same room, teacher forces learner to touch electric shock, researcher over phone
-obedience fell to 40%
-when forced to put learners hand on shock, fell to 30%
-researcher over phone, 20.5%

21
Q

Situational variables affecting obedience- Location

A

Variation: run down office
-obedience fell to 48%
legitimate authority of experimenter reduced

22
Q

Situational variables affecting obedience- Uniform

A

Variation: researcher wears normal clothes
-original wore grey lab coat
-when original researcher called away by phone call and ‘ordinary member of public’ took over, obedience dropped to 20%

23
Q

Situational variables affecting obedience AO3

A

RTS- field experient by Bickman
- confederates dress diff outfits; security, milkman and business man
-ask passers to give money to pay for parking or pick up litter
-ppts twice as likely to follow security guards instructions than business man

-Gender bias
-alternative explanation- dispositional factors

24
Q

Explanations for obedience

A

Legitimacy of authority
Agentic state

25
Q

Explanations for obedience- Legitimacy of authority

A

-obedient individuals accept the power and status of authority figures
eg parents, teachers, police
-authority is legitimate as its agreed by society
-accept credentials, believe they know what they are doing
-ingrained in us to obey

26
Q

Explanations for obedience- Agentic state

A

-people move from a state where they take personal responsibility for their actions (autonomous state)
- to a state where they believe they are acting on behalf of authority (agentic state)
-AGENTIC SHIFT
-lose sense of responsibility and no longer feel guilty

27
Q

Explanations of authority AO3

A

RTS agentic state- Milgrams obedience studies
-legitimacy of authority, accounts for cultural differences in obedience

28
Q

Dispositional explanation of obedience- Authoritarian personality

A

Adorno- internal explanation
-certain personality characteristics= high obedience
-strict parenting and disclipline
-extreme respect for authority
-believe authority as superior
measured using F scale

29
Q

Dispositional explanation of obedience AO3

A

RTS- Milgram and Elms
- social desirability
-limited explanation
-alternative explanation- situational factors

30
Q

Explanations of resistance to social influence

A

Social support
Locus of control

31
Q

Explanations of resistance to social influence- social support

A

resists pressures to conform or obey
an ally gives confidence and support to resist pressures
remain independent in behaviour

RESIST CONFORMING:
identify with ally, see them as role model of independent behaviour, no longer fear ridicule, avoid NSI

RESIST OBEDIENCE:
ally acts as model of dissent to resist obedience
diffusion of responsibility

32
Q

Explanations of resistance to social influence- Social support AO3

A

RTS- Albrecht smoking study pregnant adolescents

33
Q

Explanations of resistance to social influence- Locus of control

A

Internal locus of control- believe they control what happens to them and their behaviour is caused by their own decisions and effort, trust their own judgement over others
-more likely to remain independent, resist social influence
External locus of control- believe what happens to them is determined by external factors, eg luck or fate. more trust into judgement of authority
-take less responsibility for actions, less likely to remain independent, less able to resist social influence

34
Q

Minority influence

A

Consistency
Commitment
Flexibility

35
Q

Minority influence- consistency

A

repeating same beliefs to majority over time between all individuals (synchronic consistency)
, majority considers minority idea

36
Q

Minority influence- commitment

A

minority show dedication and make personal sacrifice
may engage in extreme activities to draw attention to their views
present risk- shows greater commitment
majority pays attention
-Augmentation principle

37
Q

Minority influence- flexibility

A

too much consistency= dogmatic and rigid
stops majority moving to minority viewpoint
-prepared to adapt and accept counter arguments
strike balance

38
Q

Social change

A

change in attitudes, behaviours or laws

Minority influence (commitment, consistency, flexibility) -Majority - Internalisation - Snowball effect= Social crypto amnesia- Social change

Social crypto amnesia- remembers idea, but not that it came from minority