social influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

normative social influence

A

conforming ue to the esire o be liked -we conform to f in with the group because we dont want to appear foolish

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

informational social influence

A

conforming due to the desire to be right we conform because we are unsure of the situation ,so we look to others who we believe have information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the three types of conformity

A

-internalisation
-identification
-compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

describe achs procedure for conformity

A

-123 male participants undergraduates
-asch put a naiive ppt a room with 6-8 confederates
-naiive ppt was lead to believe other ppts were real participants
-each ppt was asked to choose which comparison line a,b,c or d was identical to target line
-the naiive ppt sat second to last
-in 2/8 of the trials did the confedeates state the incorrect answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was the result of asch study

A

-the naiive ppt gave wrong answer 36.8% of the time
-overall 25% of men did not cnform once which meant 75% conformed at least once

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what were the three variations in asch study

A
  • group size
    -unanimity
    -task difficulty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was the aim for zimbardos research

A

To investigate how readily people would conform to the social roles in a simulated environment when allocated prisoner and guard in a role playing exercise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

describe the procedure of zimbardos study

A

American student volunteers were paid to take part in the study.
They were randomly issued one of two roles; guard or prisoner.
Both prisoners and guards had to wear uniforms.

No one was allowed to leave the simulated prison. The guards were allowed to control such behaviour,
in order to emphasise their complete power over the prisoners!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what were the results of zimbardos research

A

The study was stopped after 6 days
prisoners rebelled after 1 day
a prisoner was released on day 2
Their behaviour became increasingly violent and brutal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what were the weaknesses and strengths of zimbardos study

A

weakness - the research was unreliable since it wasnt replicated
weakness -there were breaches in the ethical issues
weakness- it lacked internal validity since there were demand characterisitics participants
also knew that the study was not real so they claimed that they
simply acted according to the expectations associated with their role
strength - real life applications , changed the way prisoners were run
explains the behaviour of police who conform to police brutality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what were the weaknesses and strength of asch research

A

weakness - low ecological valiity since it was set in a lab which lead to
low population validity -only tested on American white males ,who were pre graduates , wasn t able to make a conclusion since the sample isnt representative of the whole population
weakness - historical evidence 1950s was time people were unlikely to take a step and stand up for what they thought was right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

describe the aim for milgrams study

A

To observe whether people would obey a figure of authority when
told to harm another person i.e. evaluating the influence of a
destructive authority figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

describe the procedure for milgrams

A

The learner was strapped to a chair wired with electrodes
the teacher was required to give the learner increasingly severe electric shocks ,every time he he gave a wrong answer in the word pair task.
Shocks ranged from 15 volts to 450 volts
ppts were given the right to withdraw.
however if the ppt was feeling doubt the person in the lab coat gave prods which applied pressure on the ppt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

describe the results of milgrams the study

A

All ppts went to 300 volts
12.5% stopped at 300 volts
65% stopped at 450 volts
ppts were debriefed after
three people had uncontrollable seizures
84% reported that they were glad that they had taken part
70% of people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why is milgrams study reliable

A

his research was proven to be reliable since he it was replicated in 1966
Hofling et al nursing were instructed to give a fatal dosage by a doctor
found that 21/22 obeyed
in a field experiment giving high ecological validity
heightens population validity since was tested on women too.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

strengths and weaknesses of milgrams research

A

strength-highly reliable

weakness-low ecological validity

counter– the setting reflected obedience in real -life situations aided the relationship between ppt and experimenter

strength – high internal validity deception increased internal validity

counter –perry 2013 listened to the tapes and found ppts had doubts ,however milgram argued that 70% of people believed the shocks were real.

17
Q

what are the three situational factors which are used in milgrams variants.

A

proximity

location

uniform

18
Q

what is authoritarian personality

A

adorno argued that people are likely to obey are submissive to those of higher status .

19
Q

procedure for authoritarin personality

A

investigated the cause of obedience in a study of moe than 200 middle class white americans .
developed an f scale to measure personality type, where the f measures fascism.

20
Q

findings for the f scale

A

-fixed distinctive stereotype about other groups

-strong positive correlation between authoritarianism and prejudice

21
Q

list out the weaknesses of the authoritarian personality

A

low explanatory power

not applicable

lacks validity methodological issues

22
Q

list out the weaknesses and strengths for milgrams variations

A

Highly applicable
- research support bickmans study conducted a filed experiment in which he had confederates dressed in 3 outfits, a milkman, business suit, security guard uniform.

Lack of internal validity
- many participants worked out that the procedure was faked, for example when the experimenter was ‘replaced’ by a member of the public. Even Milgram admitted that this was clearly artificial.

Highly replicable
-found an obedience rate of ovr 90% amongst Spanish students. This shows that Milgram’s results are replicable amongst other cultures and genders, not just American males.

23
Q

What are the two explanations for resistance

A

Social support and LOC

24
Q

What is locus of control

A

An explanation for how we make sense of what directs events in our lives.

Whether someone has internal Locus of control where they believe that they have personal control over the events in their lives

Or if someone has external locus of control where they believe that they have little personal control over the events in their lives ,they blame luck or chance

25
Q

What is social support

A

When The presence of people who resist pressures to conform ,can help others or influence them to do the same
They act as modes to show that resistance is possible
This goes to break unanimity

26
Q

What is minority influence

A

A form of influence in which the minority of people persuade others to adopt their beliefs attitudes

Leads to internalisation or conversion where perhaps private attitudes change as well as public behaviours

27
Q

What is research support regarding authoritarianism

A

Milgrams and elms conducted a follow up 1966 found that those who were fully obedient went all the way to 450 volts scored higher on tests for authoritarianism

This is correlational data

Shows association not cause and effect

Hyman and sheetley suggest that authoritarianism has something to do with lower level of education
Showing that the f scale measuring authoritarianism is not an explanation for why people are submissive