Social Influence Flashcards

1
Q

Define social influence

A

The process in which behaviours and attitudes are influenced by the real or implied prescence of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of social influence

A
  1. Compliance
  2. Conformity
  3. Obedience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Compliance

A

Changing behaviour in response to a request
* Used to reach goals or attain social or personal gains
* Is only a temporary and overt change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Factors that influence compliance?

A
  1. Group strength - Social pressure, want to be a part of the group
  2. Group size - Increased people present = increased compliance
  3. Immediacy - Being in the immediate prescence of a group
  4. Similarity - Sharing something in common with the person making request
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Foot-in-the-door technique

(compliance)

A

Small request (accepted) followed by the ‘real’ and larger request

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Freedman and Fraser (1966)

foot-in-the-door technique

A

Small request: Sign a petition
Large request: Install a large and distracting sign in front lawn (says “Drive Carefully.”
* Sign petition and then install sign (experimental): 55% compliance
* Just install sign (control): 20% comliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Foot-in-the-door technique issues

A
  • The time between the two requests is crucial and can influence results
  • The sex of the experimenter has an influence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Door-in-the-face technique

A

Huge request (rejected) followed by a smaller ‘real’ request

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cialdini et al. (1975)

(Door-in-the-face technique)

A
  • Students asked to perform as unpaid counsellors for juvenile delinquents for 2 years
  • Then asked to chaperone a 2 hour zoo trip instead
    Results: 16.7% agreed without huge request first, 50% with request
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Low-balling

A

Get someone to commit to a request and then increase the ‘cost’ of the request

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Cialdini et al. (1978)

(Low-balling)

A
  • Ask students to participate in an experiment
  • After agreeing, reveal that it was taking place at 7am
    Results: Told its at 7am before agreeing (24% compliance), only reveal after (56%)
  • When offered the chance to drop out, 95% of the 56% still turned up as promised
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Joule (1987)

low-ball vs foot-in-the-door

A

Students were requested to stop smoking for 18 hours for 30 French francs
* Lowball: Originally offered 50 francs
* FITD: First asked to fill in questionnaire and then asked real request
Low-ball more effective as students were already committed whereas was an extra request for FITD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Norm of reciprocity

A

‘Doing a favour’ for a person before asking them to do something for you

Relies on social norm that people will treat others as they are treated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Regan (1971)

(Norm of reciprocity)

A

Raffle tickets study:
* Confederate gave participants free soft drinks
* Asked participants to buy their raffle tickets
* More likely to buy ticket if they were given the drink first

If someone gives you something, you feel like you owe them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is power?

In terms of compliance

A

The perceived power exhibited by the source of influence.
The capacity to influence other whilst resisting their attempts to influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

5 types of power

(French and Raven, 1959)

A
  1. Reward power - ability to reward
  2. Coercive power - ability to punish
  3. Expert power - Knowledge and information
  4. Legitimate power - Position of authority
  5. Referent power - being liked by others (charisma, trust)
17
Q

What is Conformity?

A

Changing attitudes or behaviours in order to fit in with the group majority

18
Q

Characteristics of people who conform more

A
  • Low self-esteem
  • High anxiety
  • Low IQ
  • Authoritarian personality
  • High need for social support or approval
  • Inferiority complex
  • Insecurity within the group
  • Low group status
19
Q

Situational factors of conformity

A
  1. Culture - individualistic or collectivistic
  2. Group size
  3. Group unanimity
20
Q

Asch (1951)

(conformity)

A

Line experiment
* Extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform
* Lab experiment, line judgment task, naive participant in a room with seven confederates
* Results: Experimental Group: 75% conformed at least once, around 50% conformed in 6 or more trials, 25% never conformed
* Control Group: 99% chose the correct line

21
Q

Normative influence

A

People conform because they want to fit in and be accepted within the group
* Beliefs don’t change

22
Q

Informational influence

A

People believe that others are better informed and know better

23
Q

Why did people conform?

(Asch)

A
  • Demand characteristics
  • Doubt own judgement - e.g. eyesight
  • Majority size and unanimity
  • Fear of ridicule
  • Fear of standing out
  • Task difficulty
24
Q

What is obedience?

A

Form of social influence where an individual will act in response to an order from an individual (usually an authority figure)
* Hierarchy of power and status

25
Factors influencing obedience
* Social proximity to authority figure or victim * Legitimacy of power - e.g. uniform * Location - e.g. Harvard vs old warehouse * Diffusion of responsibility * Group pressure * Persuasion
26
Milgram (1964) | (obedience)
* Electric shocks for incorrect answers ranging from 15 to 450 volts in 15-volt increments * 65% continued shocks up to 450 volts * However, 90% disobeyed if another participant did
27
Social facilitation | Triplett (1898)
Improvement of performance in the prescence of others
28
Drive theory of social facilitation | Zajonc (1965)
Social facilitation is due to **arousal** enhancing whatever response tendency is dominant * Increased arousal improves easy tasks and hinders performance on dificult ones
29
What causes arousal levels to increase?
* Evaluation apprehension - anxiety regarding being judged * Distraction - cognitive overload when paying attention to task and others * Mere prescence of others
30
What factors influence the social facilitation effect ?
Physical proximity and size of audience
31
Minority influence
The minority changing the attitudes, beliefs or behaviours of the majority * Sufragettes Movement (founded 1897) * Civil Rights movement (1896-1970) - MLK
32
Factors of minority influence
1. Self-confidence 2. Consistency 3. Commitment to cause 4. Flexibility 5. Defection from the majority - destroying the illusion of unanimity within the majority (sug-groups within)
33
What is the role of a leader?
To help lead and guide people towards the group goal * Inspire commitment * Mobilise resources * Devise strategies * Create opportunities * Influence outcomes
34
Leader vs manager
Manager: Planning, organising, scheduling, budgeting, staffing Leader: provide a vision, determine direction of an organisation, goals, provide resources and support to get the job done
35
Leader: Born or made?
Prescribed leader: Are appointed the poisiton - usually be an authority person Emergent leader: Emerge from the group and take charge - usually have the respect and support of group members
36
Types of leaders
Task orientated: Focus on meeting objectives * Provides instruction and corrects mistakes Person orientated: Focus on developing communication, maintaining social interactions and ensuring all group members are involved * Positive feedback after good performances and encouragement after mistakes
37
Leadership styles
Democratic: Offers guidance and allows members to be involved in decisions - has the final say Autocratic:
38
Leadership styles
Democratic: Offers guidance and allows members to be involved in decisions - has the final say Autocratic:
39
Heine and Lehman (1997)
Japanese don't rationalise with the free-choice paridigm - Candians do - Difficult choices are not psychologically threatening, as they do not affect the core aspects of the self - Self/ internal attitudes are not self-defining - relaionships and social roles are - Therefore, if a bad decision is made, it does not pose a threat to their cultural criteria of the self