Social Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

State the steps of social change to minority influence

A
  1. Draw attention to the issue
  2. Cognitive conflict
  3. Consistency of position
  4. The augmentation principle
  5. The snowball effect
    (6. Social cryptomnesia)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain “ drawing the attention to the issue”

A

Minorities need to make the majority aware of the issue through various means; political, educational and militant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain “cognitive conflict”

A

The minority causes the majority to think about the issue by challenging their view. Some people will simply dismiss the minority view, others will move towards the minority position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain “consistency of position”

A

The minority is most effective if the members are consistent in their argument, both over time & with each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain the “augmentation principle”

A

Suffering for a cause makes people seem more committed to it, therefor strengthening (augments) the argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain “the snowball effect”

A

Minority influence starts small, but begins to spread until it reaches a tipping point where the minority view becomes the majority view

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain “social cryptomnesia”

A

A cognitive bias experienced by whole cultures following social change. Dissociating the accomplishments of the minority from the minority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Give examples of social change

A
  1. Suffragette movement
  2. LGBTQ+ marriage rights
  3. Abolition of slavery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Give an example of social cryptomnesia

A

When somebody believes that the suffragettes were pretentious man-haters, but that women should have the right to vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain consistency in relation to minority influence

A

Consistency is when the minority does not change their viewpoint forcing the majority to rethink their views. This consistency can be synchronic (between the group) or diachronic ( over time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain flexibility in relation to minority influence

A

If the minority is too rigid and unwilling to compromise the majority will find it off putting. Minorities must be consistent but open to discussion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain flexibility in relation to minority influence

A

When a minority sticks to its views despite negative reactions and suffering, this impresses the majority and shows the importance of this viewpoint. (Links to the augmentation principle)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the name of Philip Zimbardo’s experiment

A

Stanford prison experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What type of conformity does the SPE show

A

Internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explain locus of control

A
  1. if a person has an external locus of control they believe behaviour is caused by outside factors eg, fate.
  2. if a person has an internal locus of control they believe behaviour is caused by our own decisions and efforts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

whose theory is “locus of control” (give date)

A

Rotter- 1996

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

define social support

A

The perception that we have a assistance or backing from other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Explain how social support helps resistance to conformity

A
  1. social support break unanimity

2. disobedient person can act as a role model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

state 3 factors that affect obedience

A
  1. Proximity
  2. Uniform
  3. Location
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

state the BPS ethical guidelines

A
  1. Informed consent
  2. Right to withdraw
  3. Deception
  4. Risk
  5. Confidentiality
  6. Debrief
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

how did location affect Milgram’s experiment

A

Obedience dropped when the study was moved away from the prestigious Yale University

22
Q

how did proximity affect Milgram’s experiment

A

When the learner was in the same room as the teacher, obedience dropped to 40%. When the teacher had to hold the learner’s hand onto an electric plate, this dropped to 30%

23
Q

how did uniform affect Milgram’s experiment

A

When the lab-coat wearing experimenter was replaced by somebody in ordinary clothes, obedience dropped to 20%

24
Q

state 3 examples of minority influence

A
  1. suffragettes
  2. LGBTQ+ rights
  3. Abolition of slavery
25
Q

Define internalisation

A

permanently adopting the behaviours or attitudes of the group, both publicly
and privately, because we have come to see this as
the right way to be

26
Q

Define identification

A

Changing your attitudes or behaviour to conform to a particular role. The change will last as long as the person identifies with that role.

27
Q

Define compliance

A

Changing our public attitudes or behaviour only when the majority group is present,
without any private change in behaviour

28
Q

Define normative social influence

A

Normative influence occurs when we adjust our public behaviour or opinions in order to gain the approval of our social group.

29
Q

Define informational social influence

A

Informational influence occurs when we have doubts

about our own perception or understanding of a situation, so we look to others to guide us.

30
Q

what were Asch’s findings

A

Over 12 critical trials the overall rate of conformity was 33%

31
Q

how did Asch know it was conformity that made the participants give the wrong answers

A
  1. control group made less than 1% errors
  2. In interviews afterwards, most
    participants said that they knew they
    were giving a wrong answer
32
Q

state the variations on Asch’s experiment/ The variables that affect conformity

A
  1. group size
  2. unanimity
  3. difficulty of task
33
Q

explain group size in relation to Asch’s experiment

A

The size of the majority has an effect
with up to three people, but any more people after
three won’t make any more difference.

34
Q

explain unanimity in relation to Asch’s experiment

A

It is important that the majority is united. If

one of the confederates in the group gave the correct answer instead, then this greatly lowered the rate of conformity.

35
Q

explain difficulty in relation to Asch’s experiment

A

People are more likely to conform when they

are unsure of the correct answer, so if a task is difficult then rates of conformity will increase

36
Q

evaluate Asch’s experiment (date)

A

1950s was a particularly conformist era. Later replications have shown much lower rates of conformity

37
Q

evaluate Asch’s experiment (culture)

A

individualist cultures (Europe/US) have
lower rates of conformity than collectivist
cultures (Africa/Asia) where conformity is
encouraged

38
Q

evaluate Asch’s experiment (statistics)

A

33% conformity- most of the time people did not conform, and 25% did not conform at all, so
the study actually shows more independent
behaviour than conformity

39
Q

state 2 ethical issues with zimbardo’s experiment

A
  1. lack of fully informed consent by participants- The prisoners did not consent to being ‘arrested’ at home
  2. Participants playing the role of prisoners were not protected from psychological harm, experiencing incidents of humiliation and distress.
40
Q

explain demand characteristics in relation to Zimbardo

A

Most of the guards later claimed they were simply acting. Because the guards and prisoners were playing a role, their behaviour may not be influenced by the same factors which affect behaviour in real life.

41
Q

define agentic state

A

believing we have no personal responsibility because we are acting for an authority figure

42
Q

define agentic shift

A

when we recognise someone as having authority, so

we change from an autonomous to an agentic state

43
Q

what are binding factors

A

the reasons people stay in an agentic state eg. sense

of commitment, fear of consequences, politeness, denying how bad their actions are

44
Q

define legitimate authority

A

A legitimate authority is someone who appears to fit our expectations of who should be in charge

45
Q

define authoritarian personality

A

People with authoritarian personalities have traditional values and a rigid sense of hierarchy, are prejudiced against other races, and see things in a black-and-white way

46
Q

what did Milgram & Elms do in 1966

A

Interviewed 40 participants from Milgram’s original studies to find out if Adorno’s F-scale was correct

47
Q

Are authoritarian personalities more or less likely to administer the 450v shock

A

More likely

48
Q

how does social support help us resist pressure

A

social support breaks the unanimity

49
Q

state (the basics) of Moscovici et al experiment and the results

A

(4 participants, 2 confederates blue slides that confederates called green)
if confederates were consistent participants were more likely to call them green than if the confederates were inconsistent

50
Q

Agentic state or cruelty… Evaluate

A

Whilst Agentic shift is one explanation for obedience in the STE, another is that it was due to a fundamental desire to inflict harm to others. An opportunity seized in the STE

51
Q

social context or personality… Evaluate

A

Milgram showed that situational factors were the primary cause of differences in participants obedience levels

52
Q

Rees, Wallace and social influence

A

Rees and Wallace showed that social support plays an important role in the resistance to social influence, in a study that showed that people were able to resist pressures to consume alcohol if another non-drinker was present