social inequalities: social class, kmr, paper 2 Flashcards
(85 cards)
stratification involves inequality, what is this distributed into?
w- wealth: possessions and your connections around you
i- income: how much money you earn
s- status: how people view you in society
p- power
examples of life chances (4)
divorce,housing,education,health
skilled work
any worker who has training/a certificate in a certain job role
upper class values: entrepreneurs (3)
- very focused on work
- work a source of pleasure/fun
- only really attend social occasions for publicity or networking
upper class values: old aristocrats (4)
- more interested in traditions + breeding
- believe strongly in the hierarchy and society
- society works best when organised into classes
- respect to those in authority
middle-class characteristics (6)
- more likely than other social groups to own a home (mortgages)
- more likely to live in the suburbs
- encourage children to do well in school
- dominate top streams in state schools and the university sector
- believe in meritocracy
- more willing in other social groups to defer gratification
why do marxists believe the class identity is not declining? (4)
- w/c still exploited as workers
- some see through false class consciousness and join unions, unions are still important (Gramsci)
-class inequalities dominate the structure of our society
-class conflict and divisions
evidence on the significance of class (3) (m)
- marshall 1989
-survey: 60% of sample thought as belonging to a particular class, 90% could place themselves
-class identity is still important
post modernists: class identity is becoming weaker. why? (6)
- changes in work
- less manufacturing, more service sector
- has lead to an increase in the m/c
- better standard of living for most people
- decline in trade unions and working mens club
- w/c now such a small diluted group, no point of studying them
how do you measure income inequalities? (2)
- the family resources survey: gov sponsored
- the annual survey or hours and earnings: based on 1% sample of jobs taken
stats: wealth (3)
- across all of uk, bring in nine billion
-the richest 5% annual household income is 5 times greater than the poorest 20% of the uk population
-households in the bottom 10% or the population have a wage and benefits of £9,500
stats (3) (wealth)
- across all of uk, bring in nine billion
-the richest 5% annual household income is 5 times greater than the poorest 20% of the uk population
-households in the bottom 10% or the population have a wage and benefits of £9,500
what are two problems with measuring wealth
-wealthy people are often careful with to conceal their wealth, to avoid taxation
-what should be counted as wealth is not straightforward
does wealth inequality matter
‘sustains an already unequal society, wealth inequalities an inequality iceberg.’
stats for wealth
-richest 10th earn 45% of wealth
-bottom 50% of population owned less than 5% of wealth in 2021 (Joseph round tree foundation)
-the lowest 10% have zero wealth, more debt (wealth and stats survey)
why study social mobility? (3)
- important to people because they want to feel that they can improve their lives
- shows the links between peoples past and future opportunities
- levels of social mobility are a good indicator of life chances for an individual
problems with trying to measure social mobility (2)
-measuring social class on just occupation and income, inherited wealth
- what is the cut off age for intergenerational mobility?
evidence of social mobility (5)
-goldthorpe Oxford mobility study
-published 1980
-largest study on social mobility (10,000 men)
- compared 3 classes: working class, immediate class (wc upper), service class (m/c)
-looked at the odds of mobility
findings of goldthorpe study
life had improved for everyone since ww2-considerable upward mobility and less downward mobility
why was there more upward mobility (2)
- education system has improved
- economic structure changed, less w/c jobs and more m/c jobs
1:2:4 rule of relative hope (3)
- what are the chances of me being in the service class
- a boy starting off in the service class had 4x the chance of staying there
- relative mobility was rare, based on the social class in which you started
savage and egerton 1997 (3)
- included women, longitudinal study
- the chances of escaping the w/c did not increase, with 55% of men staying in that class
- chances of w/c men rising to the service class increased for 16% to 26%
material deprivation: harker (2006)
believes there is a link between material poverty and educational achievement
harker (2006) what negative effects did she distinguish (3)
-less space to play, impairing cognitive development and leading to higher rates of depression and aggressive behaviour
-increased bullying in school due to clothing or not having ‘cool’ resources
-higher rates of stress and mental illness in children and in parents who are therefore less supportive