social inequalities, class 40 marker content Flashcards
functionalism, organic analogy 2
- durkheim- not all parts of body are equally imp similarly not all ppl contribute as much as others justifying inequality
- parsons= some sort of stratification is inevitable in all societies
evaluation for this
role allocation, davis and moore 3
- stratification is a universal feature of human societies therefore its functional
- role allocation= ensure that society’s roles are filled by the most appropriate ppl
- those more talented should be given higher status and power
evaluation for this, tumin 2
- claimed there are numerous jobs in society which are highly paid that dont contribute to society and vice versa
- maintained that its much easier for high class ppl to pursue their talents then it is for a working class person
meritocracy, parsons 2
- if a person works hard, theyll succeed. society is open and theres alot of social mobility
- social class is a fair system based on talent/ efforts and can be changed
embourgeoisement, goldthorpe and lockwood 4
- embourgeoisement = idea that working class is becoming more like the middle class
- in the 1960s, they wanted to test if this happened, hadnt fully occured but that a new sort of working class had begun to emerge, suggested a degree of convergence amongst the working classes
- evidence based on car workers in luton who were richer and had new values:
1= being home owners
2= family orientated not community focused
3= co-operated with managers bc they had the ambition to be a manager - class is becoming less of a significant form of stratification as classes are merging
evaluation, savage
class identity was still strong amongst the working classes
evaluation, braverman
- process of proletarianization has occurred instead where the middle classes started to feel like their losing their status and being treated like the working class
new right intro 2
- extension of functionalism, based on traditional conservative politics
- argue a person’s social class position is due to their own efforts
inequalities are functional, saunders 3
- poor better off under a stratified society than if they were equal in an un-stratified one
- inequality creates more wealth where everyone benefits, even if not equally. e.g= if a country is economically successful and many of the rich have large incomes so they pay more tax which is used by the gov to contribute to society through benefits and free education
- the whole society benefits from having the most able-bodied ppl doing the most imp jobs
the underclass, murray 5
underclass has diff norms and values to the working class
1. live on benefits
2. criminality
3. single parenthood
4. males absent from parenting and lack commitment
5. immediate gratification
- class inequalities are due to the person’s poor values which keeps them in poverty and these values infect society negatively
evaluation, marshall 3
- widely criticised for ignoring that class divisions are caused by economic differences not cultural attitudes
- marxists like marshall believe this is a way of blaming the poor and reinforcing negative stereotypes and the concept of the underclass is a myth
- most ppl with benefits also work
inadequate socialisation, sewell 3
- studied afro-carribean families, argued their often lone parent and this results in boys not having male role models
- they dont see men in their fam achieving in the workplace therefore they learn they dont need to succeed in a job either
- this explains why certain ethnic groups are in the working class and why its their fault
evaluation
- ignores that female headed lone parent families can socialise their children adequately and that matrifocal families can install discipline in their kids
define capitalism
economic and political system where a couintry’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit
class conflict, marx 3
- Marxism is based on the principle of class conflict and that economic power was the most imp form of division
- marx= in a capitalist society, the bourgeoisie exploit the proletariat
- the bourgeoisie own the means of production, factories, and the proletariat are subjected to unreasonable working hrs and low pay in order to make money for the bourgeoise
polarisation 2
- higher classes are getting smaller and richer, working classes getting larger and poorer
- amount of money the bourgeoisie make would increase, therefore the gap between rich and poor would increase
evaluation, pakulski and waters
- class is ‘dead’ ands classes are now converging with less obvious distinctions between the classes
social reproduction, marx 2
- class is ascribed= they are given and cant change
- the bourgeoisie continue to stay the bourgeoisie bc they own the means of production and ensure the proletariat never have enough money to change their position
social reproduction, engels 3
- bourgeoisie have created a family structure system ensuring they keep their wealth
- development of nuclear fam means fathers coul pass on their wealth through inheritance of property to their sons
- wealth stays within families and not shared with others
evaluation 3
- greater social mobility than in the past
- uk govs would argue they put measures in place to help this happen - bursaries and benefits
- marx didnt acknowledge fully a middle class of professional workers where an individual can earn a high pay, high status job
neo-marxism intro 2
- retains basic marxist ideas of class conflict, but their attitude to class places less emphasis on economics than traditional marxism, more evidence on the media and cultural factors
- these create sets of ideas which the working class see as natural, these facts serve the needs of the ruling class and create false consciousness - dont realise their being exploited
capitals, bourdieu
- aimed to explain how the bourgeoisie maintained social reproduction. said it was thru the passing down of capitals from one gen to the next
- bourgeoisie have these capitals which maintains their social class position and vice versa for the proletariat
- creates a habitus for the diff classes which is very difficult if impossible to change
define social. cultural and economic capital 3
- social= having connections to others in high social positions
- cultural= knowledge and attitudes which are valued amongst the ruling classes
- economic= income and wealth