social explanations of crime and anti-social behaviour: labelling and SFP Flashcards
when does labelling usually take place?
- when a group of people, are grouped together out of an interest or characteristic, see another group as INFERIOR
- creates majority-SUPERIOR group and minority-INFERIOR group
- negative ideas linked to inferior group
what are labels based on?
- labels are often based on stereotypes
- once label is given to individual or group, they may be treated according to that label
what is labelling described as?
- when something is expected of individual by others it becomes true
- if someone is given a label, they may well live up to that label, leading to stereotyping
when is a behaviour considered deviant?
- behaviour is only deviant if society says it is deviant
- by giving behaviour label of deviant, then authorities maintain their power structure
what happens when a person is labelled deviant?
- once person has been labelled deviant because of a behaviour that person becomes stigmatised
- label affects how others treat them, as they will be untrustworthy
what are the people with negative labels more likely to have?
- lower self-image of themselves
- more likely to reject themselves
- person will go on to act in ways that fulfil the label and commit more criminal behaviour
what is the effect of labels/labelling?
- labels can affect individual’s self-concept (how we see ourselves) and lead to SFP
- labels can affect way others treat you and may lead to SFP
- society may label people according to the way others treat you and this may lead to SFP
what is a self-fulfilling prophecy?
- a prediction that directly or indirectly causes itself to become true due to positive feedback between belief and behaviour
how is a self-fulfilling prophecy created?
prophecy is set + expectation = prophecy is fulfilled
who created the term self-fulfilling prophecy?
- described in 1948 by Robert Merton
- described “a false definition of the situation evoking a new behaviour which makes the originally false conception come true” (Merton 1948:477)
what is a self-fulfilling prophecy in summary? give example
- when person unknowingly causes prediction to come true, due to simple fact that they expect it to come true
- e.g. expectation about subject can affect our behaviour toward subject, which causes expectation to be realised
what is the pygmalion effect? (upgrade)
how does Flanagan 2000 describe SFP?
- self-fulfilling prophecy occurs when a prediction about another comes true simply because of the expectation
what are the steps in the SFP?
step 1: perceiver has expectations of the target person
step 2: perceiver behaviour towards target
step 3: target behaviour towards the perceiver
therefore: prophecy is fulfilled
supporting evidence for labelling theory and SFP (J + counter argument)
Jahoda 1954
- found males born on wednesday had significantly higher arrest rate (22%) than males born Monday (6%)
- SFP because boys born monday are named KWADWO (mild mannered) whereas boys born wednesday are named KWADKU (aggressive and short tempered)
- valid data as if comes from crime records
- however, not been replicated so this may just be one off
supporting evidence for labelling theory and SFP (R & J + counter argument)
Rosenthal and Jacobson 1968
- found students labelled as bloomers had improved IQ scores and continued to thrive for next two years in comparison to other students in class
- suggests ‘prophecy’ came true because teachers responded differently to them
- study well controlled - children randomly allocated to each condition
- however, may be due to teacher’s beliefs they were being observed and felt they needed to act on information they were given
- educational setting rather **than crime*
supporting evidence for labelling theory and SFP (C)
Chambliss 1973
- found roughnecks were more likely to be labelled deviant by police and more likely to have legal action taken against them
- saints were not supporting fact that labelling is part of the power structure
other things for labelling theory and SFP (strength)
- Jahoda’s study collected quantitative data and focuses on criminal behaviour
other things for labelling theory and SFP (weakness)
- Jahoda’s study is based on one culture (west africa) - culturally bound
- only focuses on males
- not replicated since 1950’s - time bound
- Rosenthal and Jacobson’s study only come from educational area
opposing evidence for labelling theory and SFP (L)
Lemert 1962
- found cheque forgers had been forging cheques long before caught, so had been active before labelled, so self-image is not affected by label
different theories for labelling theory and SFP (weakness)
- SLT (social learning theory)
- biological explanation (genetics, XYY syndrome, brain (amygdala))
application for labelling theory and SFP (strength)
- Jahoda’s study helps understand criminal behaviour