social change Flashcards
processes leading to social change
1) drawing attention
2) consistency
3) deeper processing
4) augmentation principle
5) snowball effect
6) social crypto amnesia
drawing attention
using marches, protests etc. to draw attention to the issue
consistency
be consistent in the message and over time
deeper processing
people start to think about the minority opinion
augmentation principle
willing to take risks to show commitment
snowball effect
the group slowly gains more authority and grows in number
becomes the majority and causes conformity and obedience to occur
social crypto amnesia
many have no memory of how the changes came about
example of social change
Suffragettes
Suffragettes
1) educational, political and militant tactics
2) continued for 15 years
3) conflict created in minds after being exposed to suffragettes views
4) willing to suffer - hunger strikes, imprisonment
5) group membership encouraged others to join
6) now we don’t remember how women’s votes came about or the events leading up to it
social influence research (conformity)
- a single dissenter can create social change
- normative social influence can create social change by drawing out attention to what others are doing
social influence research (obedience)
- disobedient peers caused a reduction in obedience
- gradual commitment (‘foot in the door phenomenon’) refers to instances where a person might show some sort of commitment to a particular task
e.g. starting something and then as they continue it comes harder to back down/change their mind
evaluation of social change
normative SI support
minority influence
majority influence
normative SI support (SOCIAL CHANGE EVALUATION)
Nolan et al (2008)
- hung messaged on the front doors of houses with the messaged that most residents were trying to reduce their energy consumption
- some residents had a different message that made no reference to other people’s behaviour
- found significant decreases in energy usage in the first group
minority influence (SOCIAL CHANGE EVALUATION)
Nemeth (1986)
- claimed minorities encourage broader thinking in majorities
- wider society critically evaluate minority viewpoints and leads to better decision making
- shows dissenting minorities is as important in social change
majority influence (SOCIAL CHANGE EVALUATION)
Mackie (1987)
-believed majorities may create deeper processing than minorities if you do not share their views
- it forces us to consider their view more deeply
- suggests minority influence may not be a valid explanation