resistance to social influence Flashcards
resistance to social influence
social support
locus of control
social support
those with social support can be :
- more confident
- will not fear rejection or ridicule
-more likely to resist social influence and remain independent
conformity (social support)
when a confederate gave a correct answer in Asch’s study the conformity dropped to 5%
obedience
Milgram
when the ppt was paired with 2 other teachers (confederates) who refused to go on
number of people who went to 450v dropped to 10%
evaluation of social support
conformity support
obedience support
real world application
conformity support (SOCIAL SUPPORT EVALUATION)
Allen and Levine (1971)
- resistance to conformity increased from 3% to 64% when there was social support
- even if dissenter wore thick glasses and said he had difficulty with his vision = 36%
obedience support (SOCIAL SUPPORT EVALUATION)
Gamson et al (1982)
- found higher rates of resistance when they asked ppts to produce evidence for an oil company to use for a smear campaign
- 29/33 (88%) rebelled
real world application (SOCIAL SUPPORT EVALUATION)
Albrecht et al (2006)
- adolescents who has a ‘buddy’ to support them during an antismoking campaign
- less likely to smoke than those without a buddy
locus of control
refers to a person’s perception of personal control over their own behaviour
measured along a dimension of ‘high internal’ to ‘high external’
high internals…
- active seekers of information that is useful to them
- rely less on the opinions of others
- take responsibility for their own actions and base decisions on their own beliefs
- resist pressures from others
- more achievement oriented and so more likely to become leaders
- more self confident and higher intelligence so better able to resist coercion as they don’t need social approval
high externals
- more likely to be influenced by others
- don’t believe they exercise personal control over their lives
Oliner and Oliner (1998) (LOCUS OF CONTROL)
those who resisted orders in Nazi Germany were more likely to have a high internal locus of control
evaluation of locus of control
contradicting research
Twenge et al (2004)
depends of the situation
contradicting research (LOCUS OF CONTROL EVALUATION)
Schurz (1985)
- found 80% of ppts gave a highest possible shock to a learner
- locus of control measures were not predictable of obedience
Twenge et al (LOCUS OF CONTROL EVALUATION)
analyses LOC studies from 1960-2002 in America
found that over time people became more resistant but also more external
opposite of what we would expect