SOC 18 - Resistance to social influence Flashcards
What is resistance to social influence?
- Refers to the ability of people to withstand the social pressure to conform to the majority or to obey authority
- This ability to withstand social pressure is influenced by both situational and dispositional factors
What is social support?
- The presence of people who resist pressure to conform or obey can help others to do the same
- These people act as models to show other that resistance to social influence is possible (e.g. non-conforming individual helps to resist conformity/disobedient individual helps to resist obedience)
What is locus of control (LOC)?
- Refers to the sense we each have about what directs events in our lives
- Internals believe they are mostly responsible for what happens to them (internal locus of control)
- Externals believe it is mainly a matter of luck or other outside forces (external locus of control)
What is internal LOC (internals)?
They believe that the things that happen to them are largely controlled by themselves
- They are confident, achievement-orientated, less need for social approval
- Less likely to conform in response to NSI
- Less likely to obey because autonomous and confidence to challenge authority
- Individuals with a high internal locus of control are more likely to be independent
- They are active seekers of information that is useful to them. They are therefore less likely to rely on the opinions of others
- They feel that they control their own lives, so they do not need to be influenced by others
- They are less likely to conform and less likely to obey
What is external LOC (extrernals)?
They tend to believe the things that happen are outside their control, it is due to chance or luck
- Individuals with a high external locus of control are less likely to be independent
- They rely on information and instructions from other people
- They are therefore more likely to rely on the opinion of others
- They feel that they do not control their own lives, so they do need information from others
- They are more likely to conform and more likely to obey
What is an LOC continuum?
- People are not just either internal or external
- LOC is a scaled and individuals vary in their position on it
- So, high internal LOC is at one end of the continuum and high external at the other
- Low internal and low external lie in-between
Who proposed the idea of locus of control?
Julian Rotter
What are the strengths of social support as a way of resisting social influence?
- There is research evidence for the positive effects of social support
- There is research evidence to support the role of dissenting peers in resisting obedience
- There is evidence that social support can help individuals to resist the influence of a group
What research evidence is there for the positive effects of social support?
- Susan Albrecht et al. (2006) evaluated Teen Fresh Start USA, an eight-week programme to help pregnant adolescents aged 14-19 resist peer pressure to smoke
- Social support was provided by a slightly older mentor or ‘buddy’
- At the end of the programme adolescents who had a ‘buddy’ were significantly less likely to smoke than a control group of participants who did not have a ‘buddy’
- This shows that social support can help young people resist social influence as part of an intervention in the real world
What research evidence is there to support the role of dissenting peers in resisting obedience?
- William Gamson et al’s (1982) participants were told to produce evidence that would be used to help an oil company run a smear campaign
- The researchers found higher levels of resistance in their study than Milgram did in his
- This was probably because the participants were in groups so could discuss what they were told to do
- 29 out of 33 groups of participants (88%) rebelled against their orders
- This shows that peer support can lead to disobedience by undermining the legitimacy of an authority figure
What evidence is there that social support can help individuals to resist the influence of a group?
- A study by Vernon Allen and John Levine (1971) showed that social support can help individuals to
resist the influence of a group - In an Asch-type task, when the dissenter was someone with apparently good eyesight, 64% of genuine participants refused to conform. When there was no supporter at all only 3% of participants resisted
- However, the study also showed that social support does not always help
- This is because when the
dissenter had obviously poor eyesight (thick glasses) resistance was only 36%
What are the strengths of LOC?
- There is research evidence to support the link between LOC and resistance to obedience
What research evidence is there to support the link between LOC and resistance to obedience?
- Charles Holland (1967) repeated Milgram’s baseline study and measured whether participants
were internals or externals - He found that 37% of internals did not continue to the highest shock level (i.e. they showed some resistance), whereas only 23% of externals did not continue
- In other words, internals showed greater resistance to authority in a Milgram-type situation
- This shows that resistance is at least partly related to LOC, which increases the validity of LOC as an explanation of disobedience
What are the limitations of LOC?
- There is evidence that challenges the link between LOC and resistance
- There is a limited role of LOC
What evidence is there that challenges the link between LOC and resistance?
- Jean Twenge et al. (2004) analysed data from American locus of control studies conducted over a 40-year period (from 1960 to 2002)
- The data showed that, over this time span, people became more resistant to obedience but also more external
- If resistance is linked to an internal locus of control, we would expect people to have become more internal
- This suggests that locus of control is not a valid explanation of how people resist social influence