SN806 Financial Reporting Implications Under the ACA Flashcards
1
Q
How does risk adjustment increase uncertainty in an issuer’s reported financial statements?
A
- Uncertainty as to the issuers risk score
- 1 as of year-end, issuer does not possess all data that will be relevant to calculating its own risk score
- 2 issuer might estimate whether IBNP claims will impact risk scores
- Uncertainty as to other issuers risk scores
- Uncertainty as to member exposure
- 1 the ACA increases the grace period from 30 days to 90 days
- Granularity of the calculation
- 1 a series of separate calculations for each risk adjustment cell
- Implications of data reviews: could lead to payment adjustments
2
Q
How do reinsurance benefits and the risk corridor of ACA affect financial reporting?
A
- Reinsurance benefits
- 1 the reinsurance mechanism protects issuers from increase in large claims, since issuers can no longer deny coverage based on preexisting conditions
- 2 increases uncertainty or impairs comparability in financial statements
- 2.1 The ACA reinsurance benefit motivates issuers to estimate potential reinsurance recovery on unpaid claims lacking specific information
- 2.2 potential valuation allowance on reinsurance recoverable, since reinsurance could be reduced due to availability of funds
- 2.3 issuer may have to estimate a probability of reinsurance claim denial
- Risk corridor
- 1 payments will be made from HHS to the issuer experience is > 3 percent above a target, and vice versa
- 2 pertains only to qualified health plans
- 3 calculation is at plan-specific level, more granular than risk adjustment cells
- 4 calculation is after considering transfer from risk-adjustment or reinsurance
3
Q
HIP (health insurance providers) fee issues regarding financial statements and metrics
A
- Risk of modest imaging the HIP fee amount in interim financial statements
- Earnings emergence implications of revenue/expense mismatch
- 1 if issuers collect prem in 2013 to pre-fund the 2014 HIP fee, they can’t defer the recognition of revenue from 2013
- 2 issuers will report positive incremental net income in 2013 and negative incremental net income in 2014
- Comparability across issuers subject to different tax code provisions
- 1 increase in premium to recoup HIP fee lowers (claims/prem). The decrease is more significant the higher the income tax rate
- 2 the ratio of income tax to operate income > tax rate, because the HIP fee is non-tax deductible and lowers operating income
- Customer rebate implications of revenue/expense mismatch
- 1 HIP fees are adjustments to the ACA’s MLR denominator. If incremental premiums equal the incremental HIP fee then no impact on the MLR or rebates
4
Q
- Differences between ACA risk-adjustment and the Medicare Advantage (MA) mechanism
- Parallels between ACA risk-adjustment and Medicaid programs in some states
A
- Differences between ACA risk-adjustment MA mechanism
- 1 MA is a retrospective model. Info from prior calendar year develop risk scores for current calendar year
- 2 MA adjustment is not multiple programs based on state/market/risk pool combinations
- 3 MA plans have a high level of stability in membership from year to year
- 4 for MA, majority of enrollees are administered by the federal govt
- Parallels between ACA risk-adjustment and Medicaid programs in some states
- 1 Medicaid risk-adjustment is designed to be budget neutral to the state
- 2 Each issuers risk score needs normalized relative to those of other issuers
- 3 Difference: Medicaid uses concurrent data applied prospectively to adjust following years capitation rates
5
Q
ACA reinsurance contribution issues regarding issuers’ financial statements and metrics
A
- Expense estimation risk is unlikely to be significant
- 1 Each year’s national reins. Contribution rate is fixed in advance
- Earnings emergence implications of revenue/expense mismatch
- 1 The reinsurance contribution rate will vary by calendar year
- 2 assume level premiums across the policy year
- 3 Issuers will have negative earnings associated with the reins. Contribution some years offset by positive in other years
- Comparability across issuers subject to different tax code provisions
- 1 Irrelevant to the reinsurance contribution, unlike the HIP fee
- Customer rebate implications of revenue/expense mismatch
- 1 The same for the reinsurance contribution as it is for the HIP fee
- Cash flow timing
- 1 An issuer’s cash flow and operating earnings for the calendar year is impacted by whether the issuer pays the bill in Dec or Jan
6
Q
Explain how payments from regulators that require subsequent true-ups affect insurer financial reporting
A
- Premium Subsidies
- 1 Estimate the advanced payment tax credits received for members no longer in force, and establish a liability to be refunded to the government
- 2 A receivable for outstanding receipts may need to be set up
- Cost-sharing reduction payments
- 1 if the government paid too much in estimated payments to the issuer, the issuer will need to reimburse the government and vice versa
- 2 this potential mismatch requires the issuer to set up an asset or liability
7
Q
How does ACA affect claim liabilities
A
- There will be uncertainty around the morbidity level of issuers members
- 1 An issuer’s risk pool will change with the introduction of exchanges
- 2 A portion will come from previously uninsured and high-risk pools
- 3 need marketplace modeling to project the PMPM for recent months
- Monitoring the mix of plans
- 1 avg benefits will increase due to min actuarial value and essential benefit requirements
- 2 evaluate whether to combine on-exchange and off-exchange plans
- 3 evaluate whether to combine plans across metal levels for reserving
- 4 impact that low-income cost sharing subsidies will have on seasonality
- Increased provider risk sharing also will have an impact on claims reserves
- 1 decide whether to calculate reserves separately for ACOs or combine them with commercial business
- 2 determine liabilities for amounts owed to providers under gain sharing
- 3 if claims are higher than targets, may set up a receivable from providers
- Consideration will need to be given to PAD amounts
- Payment patterns also are likely to be impacted by claims operations
8
Q
How does ACA affect non-claim liabilities
A
- Contract Reserves
- 1 Appropriate if a portion of past premiums was designed to pre fund future claims
- 2 a consequence of an issue age premium structure and medical u/w
- 3 this type of reserve less relevant since medical u/w no longer allowed
- 4 GAAP lock-in principle: may not be possible for issuers to update their reserve assumptions
- 5 For SAP, the lock-in principle generally is believed to not apply
- 6 MLR rebate: the release of contract reserves will impact customer rebates
- Due and Unpaid Premium Asset
- 1 Under ACA some members have a 90-day prem grave period, rather than 30-day
- premium deficiency reserves (PDR)
- 1 rate review under the ACA: consider likelihood of regulatory approval when evaluating rate increase assumptions for PDR calculation
- 2 changes in the insurance market could lead to changes in how issuers define their blocks of business for PDR testing purpose