Skills - Hypotheses/Methods Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Hypotheses

3

A

Hypotheses

Velocity up as move downstream
|_> geometry channel wider/less friction - efficiency up

Sed shape rounder as move downstream
|_> longer exposure to erosive processes

Sed shape down as move downstream
|_> longer exposure to erosive processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Methods

Velocity

A

Methods

Impellar (3 equal intervals)

Width (tape measure) - pragmatic

Depth (5 reading, metre rule) - linear systemat.

Wetted perimeter (long tape measure)

Gradient (automated level)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Methods

Sed shape

A

Methods

5 samples where metre rule touched (depth measurement) - linear systematic

Powers index

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Methods

Sed size

A

Methods

5 samples where metre rule touched (depth measurement) -linear systematic

Wooden calliper (length, bredth, width)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why Holford

A

Why Holford

4.2 km long (good size for time and representative data)

Remote (lack of human influence as measuring physical processes)

Generally shallow enough (safe)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why Holford

How make better?

A

Why Holford

Had to sample pragmatically (access/footpaths)

Add site near mouth (not enough to gain effective stat. testing)

Increase amount of time

Better time of year (weather/time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Positives for methods

Velocity

A

Reliable equipment (better dog biscuits)

Calculated ave. (overcame x-channel changes from thalweg)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Improve methods

Velocity

A

Improve methods

Impellar struggled (too shallow) - had to tap

Take more measurements at different depths (if more time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Improve methods

Channel Geometry

A

Improve methods

Width - more readings and tape had to be taught (localised winds)

Wetted perimeter - chains

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Positives for methods

Gradient

NO NEED TO IMPROVE!!!

A

Positives for methods

Pragmatically sampled by teachers (automated level)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Positives for methods

Sediment shape

Sediment size

A

Positives for methods

Other groups data used (enlarge sample size/more representative)

Wooden calliper used for size

Powers index for shape (same person used)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Improve methods

Sediment shape

Sediment size

A

Improve methods

Tendency to select largest/easiest to retrieve

Rushed (weather/boredom)

Pebble shape subjective (bad to share results)

Larger sample (more than 5)

Use random stratified (6 numbers com gen 0-100)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Limitations

5

A

Limitations

Other people

Time/Weather

Accessibility

Sampling methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Limitations

Time/Weather

A

Limitations

7 hours (10am-5pm)

Exteremely cold and heavy rain

January (dark early) - rain also limit visibility
|_> collection rushed (no site 7)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Limitations

Sampling methods/Accessibility

A

Limitations

Pragmatically selected (systematic not possible) due to:

  • steep banks
  • private property
  • heavy equipment (automated level) restricted site choice
  • sites spaced irregularly (1-3 bunched ang 5-6 1.9km gap)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Limitations

Other people

A

Limitations

Large disparity in accuracy of data between groups

Some groups favoured larger sediment

Some groups worked slower (not finish)

Others rushed

17
Q

Conclusions

Sediment size

A

Conclusions

LITTLE DEFINITVE CHANGE

Clast size fluctuating between 10-13cm

Use of mean may hide true nature due to anomalies

18
Q

Conclusions

Sediment size

WHY NOT

A

Conclusions

Tributary @ site 3 mean not all sediment may be transported from source

HYPOTHESIS RUNS ON ASSUMPTION

19
Q

Conclusions

Sediment shape

A

Conclusions

Rounder as move downstream

Site 3 anomaly = 16 SA (TRIBUTARY)

Site 2 = 8 SA

Site 4 = 14 SA

20
Q

Conclusions

Channel Geometry

Gradient

A

Conclusions

Wetted p, depth, width, discharge, efficiency all +VE CORRELATIONS as move downstream

Gradient spikes @ Site 3
- 0.0500 to 0.0850 to 0.0590

NOT EXPECT