Situation Ethics Flashcards

1
Q

Fletcher maintains that there are
essentially three different ways of
making moral decisions, what are they?

A
  • Antinomian Ethics
  • Legalistic Ethics
  • Situation Ethics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is legalistic Ethics?

A

Legalistic Ethics has a set list of moral rules or regulations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are some examples of religions that use legalistic ethics?

A

Christianity and Judaism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why did Fletcher criticize legalistic ethics?

A

Fletcher said that life’s complexities require additional laws. Murder: killing in self defence, killing in war, killing
unborn human beings etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is antinomian ethics?

A

The reverse of legalistic ethics. It literally means ‘against law’. A person using antinomianism doesn’t really use an ethical system at all.
He or she enters decision-making as if each occasion was totally unique. Making a moraldecision is a matter of spontaneity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the one single rule in situation ethics?

A

The rule of agape. This love is not merely an emotion but involves doing what is best for the other person, unconditionally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What do situation ethicists think about rules

A

The situationist enters into a moral dilemma with the principles and rules of his or her community.
However, they are prepared to set these rules aside in the situation if LOVE seems better served by doing so.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the four working principles?

A

Pragmatism, relativism, positivism, personalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the five main criticisms of situation ethics?

A

2) It is vague when offering an explanation of value – ‘love’ promotes ‘human welfare’…but what’s best for human welfare?

His definition of ‘the situation’ – everyone approaches situations with different values/priorities. Can you truly create ‘norms’ out of people’s moral instincts? the ends justify the means? – is it acceptable to ignore all consequences in favour of an action?

All rules except love can be broken –is that true? Aren’t there some universal rules?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly