Sino-Soviet relations (1949-76) Flashcards
Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship, Alliance and Mutual Assistance (1950):
Reasons for the Treaty
- PRC isolated from West as it was a communist state
- Obvious ideological affinity b/w China/USSR
- USSR economy needed to be rebuilt
- Est. new trading partner in USSR’s interest
Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship, Alliance and Mutual Assistance (1950)
Terms of the Treaty
- Alliance — guaranteed USSR would come to China’s aid when in conflict w/ capitalist nations
-
Mutual assistance — agreed to trade/share knowledge
- set up joint stock company to mine in Xinjang
- Soviet experts helped to set up/run 141 Chinese business enterprises
-
Friendship — USSR granted aid to China
- loan of $300 million
- equipment for 50 construction projects
**Sino-soviet co-operation during **Korean War
- Mao wanted to unite Korea by military means
- Stalin pushed for Chinese military involvement in pref. to a direct Soviet presence in Korea
- USSR provided air support/military advisors
- Stalin left strategic matters to Mao, but reserved right to intervene/overrule
-
Stalin’s actions driven by self-interest rather than proletariat int’lism
- demanded China to pay for military support received
- made USSR seem like arms merchants than genuine Communist int’lists
- by working w/ USSR, feeling of comradely cooperation b/w communist powers engendered, yet nature of relationship gave sense of inequality/moral superiority
- Seeds of Sino-Soviet split were sown during Korean War
Confrontation over Taiwan
- Mao unsuccessful attempts to take Taiwan signif. due to response of superpowers:
- In US, Congress quick to defend Taiwan
- signed Mutual Defence Treaty (1954), guaranteed Taiwan’s independence
- In US, Congress quick to defend Taiwan
- Khrushchev publicly agreed to retaliate against US if China invaded/bombed by US forces
- Privately clearly didn’t want to be involved
- showed USSR unwilling to help China to achieve its military goals
Great Leap Forward (1958)
- Mao launched policy that was clear rejection of USSR’s model of econ. development
- whereas USSR stressed role of epertise and working class in developing econ. GLF based on enthusiasm of peasants
- claimed that GLF was superior to 5-Year-Plans
- whereas USSR stressed role of epertise and working class in developing econ. GLF based on enthusiasm of peasants
- Demonstrated that Mao was willing to forge his own path, inc. independent of USSR
- Mao inc. convinced Khrushchev wasn’t a real revolutionary
- was administrator concerned w/ organisation and not w/ change
- By initiating GLF, MAo consciously undermining Khrushchev’s leadership of communist world
Reasons for Sino-Soviet split:
Personal differences/political rivalries
- Competing claims to leadership of Int’l communism (GLF)
- Failure of Khrushchev visit to China (1958/1959)
-
China developing nuclear programme
- a-bomb (1964)
- h-bomb (1967)
- Mao publicised Khrushchev backdown during Cuban Misile Crisis
- demonstrated his lack of resolve when dealing w/ US
Reasons for the Sino-Soviet split after 1958:
Ideological differences
- Khrushchev pursued policy of reconciliation w/ Tito (Yugoslav leader) had been unwilling to impose Stalin’s policies in 1948
- Mao regarded this as ideological revisionism
-
Peaceful coexistence vs cont’d revolution:
- Mao heavily critical of Khrushchev’s pursuit of improved relations w/ US; saw Peaceful Coexistence as showing weakness against capitalist power
- heightened during Khrushchev’s visit to US (1959)
- Mao saw this as abandoning millions of comrades struggling to free themselves of capitalist oppression
- Mao heavily critical of Khrushchev’s pursuit of improved relations w/ US; saw Peaceful Coexistence as showing weakness against capitalist power
-
Khrushchev’s Secret Speech (1956) - criticisms of Stalin’s domestic policies:
- Stalin’s application of ideology contained errors, communism must be applied in different ways
- Mao’s domestic policies based on Stalin’s —* greatly offended*
- accused Khrushchev of “encouraging” anti-communism of E.EU
- Khrushchev highly critical of Great Leap Forward (1958)
- publically criticised in 1959
- Mao responded - called him ‘revisionist’, no longer on true path of communism
- China encouraged fellow-communist Albania/Romania to assert greater independence fr Moscow
- Khrushchev criticised Mao for splitting the communist movement, thus helping the capitalists — Mao thought the same!
- Differences over Test Ban Treaty (1963)
Reasons for the Sino-Soviet split after 1958:
National/strategic interests
- Arguments over USSR’s refusal to reduce its ties to Mongolia, which China considered to be within its sphere
- Tension over Taiwan (1950)
-
Sino-Indian Border Conflict (1962) exposed divisions
- Rather than back ally, Khrushchev publicly criticised China’s war involvement
- signalled support for India by sending aid with $800 million
- Khrushchev backed Indonesia in Sino-Indonesian disputes (1959-62) by sending massive Soviet military aid to China’s enemy
-
Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia (1968) — was invaded to bring more independent communist govt back into line w/ Moscow’s direction
- Chinese understood that USSR could use such actions elsewhere
-
Sino-Soviet border disputes - Damanksy/Chenbao (1969)
- manifestation rather than cause??!!!
Reasons for the Sino-Soviet split after 1958:
Conclusion
- Fact Khrushchev labelled as ‘Rightist/Revisionist’ after Secret Speech suggests ideological diff imp, but was encouraged by national interests:
- Great Leap Forward consolidated power of Left in CCP by attacking revisionism as enemy
-
Border disputes usually manifestations of division rather than cause:
- Long borders shared b/w countries remain on stable relations e.g. US/Canada
- Ideology provided excuses to present divisions
Significance of Sino-Soviet split for superpower relations
- Split weakened Soviet, providing opportunity for US
- Communist nations around world could choose to follow China, rather than USSR
- USSR lost ideological/moral authority in communist world
- Public dispute alerted US govt of divisions in communist world
- Nixon considered developing Sino-US relationship to exploit difficulties b/w China/USSR
Launching ‘ping-pong’ diplomacy
Negotiations and public meetings developed working relationship b/w China and US
Altered balance of the Cold War
Chinese motives for rapprochement
- Worried of reports of pre-emptive Soviet nuclear strike
- Need to strengthen position against power that emerged as more imp threat to Chinese security — USSR!
- Mao hoped alliance w/ US could be used to confront USSR, forcing it to accept exp. of China’s borders
US motives for rapprochement
- Nixon wanted to exploit Sino-Soviet split by using relationship w/ China to put pressure of USSR to compromise w/ West
- Hoped friendship w/ China would allow US to focus entire nuclear arsenal on USSR
Reasons for rapprochement between USA and China after 1969
- Chinese govt decided it was in its interest to seek rapprochement (friendliness) w/ US
- Main motive was need to strengthen position against power that emerged as more imp threat to Chinese security — USSR!
- Chinese security couldn’t be adequately be protected by sustaining hostility to US at same time as relations w/ USSR deteriorated to dangerous level
- Thus some sort of accommodation w/ US was necessary
- Geological interpretation h.light threat to Chinese security - escalating war in Vietnam that threatened to inc. US involvement in region; continued conflict w/ Taiwan; hostile neighbours e.g. SK/Japan; tension w/ India over their shared border.
Impact of the Sino-US rapprochement and its achievements
- Relaxed trade/travel restrictions w/ China (1969)
- US recognised PRC (1969
- US backs entry into UN (1971)
- By 1971, both willing to progress contacts but obstacles remained
- US support for Taiwan, military situation in Vietnam, division of N/SK, emergence of Japan as an econ. world power
- 1971 Kissinger (US Sec. of State) visited China, est. good working relationship w/ Enlai (key CCP member)
-
1972 Nixon visited China:
- a communiqué produced
- allowed both to stress diff as well as common ground
- Presented visit as a diplomatic success, that didn’t involve abandonment of principles
- allowed both to stress diff as well as common ground
- a communiqué produced
-
Chinese govt put pressure on USSR by visiting countries in E. EU to strengthen ties w/ China at expense of USSR
- visits to Yugoslavia/Romania particularly successful
-
Trade b/w China/USSR grew considerably from $5 million to $500 million a year
- US refused to trade in goods w/ military use, but didn’t stop allies (Br) from doing so
- Improved links w/ US caused tension b/w China and allies
- Albania accused China of betraying world proletarian revolution
- Links provided series of opportunities for both China/US to embarrass/undermine USSR
- a communiqué issued after Nixon’s visit to China implied a joint stand against USSR actions
- For US, closer links w/ China valuable way of exerting pressure on USSR to extract concessions from them
- was to become key in negotiations undertaken during Détente