Similarity Flashcards
Why is similarity important?
- categorisation (e.g., colour of the creature deciding the category that its in)
- learning (e.g., learning whether previous knowledge can be implied into the new/existing context) (The Duncker’s radiation problem)
- gestalt perception (likelihood of grouping similar items into a group)
- memory
(likelihood of remembering depends on similar items that are presented)
(Even if the word dream didn’t appear, we think it did due to the similar semantic relationship with other words.) - generalising (generalising new items based on similar properties of previous items)
- witness identification
- what is similarity
- On what basis to evaluate similarity
- how to measure similarity
- similarity = the sameness between two objects.
sameness = the two objects evoke the same action/consequences - perception
goal-based
conceptual
relational
analogies - scale
response time
confusability
AXB force choice
stimulus arrangement
What are the methods that are examined in the Hout, Goldinger & Ferguson Experiment
scale
AXB Force Choice
Stimulus arrangement
Explain how the multidimensional scale is used in the experiment and the results
The further the objects (i.e., the clock and the bugs) are apart from each other on the scale, the more different they are perceived by the participants
Then, the deviance between the participants’ scale and the ideal scale (ideal stimulus space) is measured
> the higher the deviance, the more inaccurate the method is
Turns out the stimulus arrangement method = lowest deviance = the most accurate
What does the Hout, Goldinger and Ferguson Experiment measure
the accuracy of the three methods measuring similarity
When will the stimulus arrangement not work? and what is the alternative
when there are too many stimulus for arrangement
can have the participants to do a portion of the stimulus
then combine the data of all participants
if the number of participants are enough, should have enough data for all stimulus
then plot onto the MDS to understand the underlying relationship between the stimulus
how many dimensions do people consider when viewing the rocks and other real world objects respectively
8-10, 47-48
Explain geometric model of similarity (and two additional characteristics)
human mind subconsciously plot items on a graph according to their degree of similarity, even though the stimulus are given separately
the closer the items are, the more similar they are
also shows the dimensions that human took into account when distinguishing similarity
e.g.,
faces > adiposity and age
boxes > height and bar position (height makes more difference than bar position)
colour > different from physical representation (instead in a circle)
musical notes > different notes on a same octave (chroma) and same note but on different octave (latter = more similar)
emotions > hedonic valence (goodness/badness) and the potency (strength)
flaws of the geometric model
symmetry constraints
mathematically
A > B = B > A
however, this might not be the case
the surgeon is like the butcher /= the butcher is like a surgeon
triangle inequality
mathematically
d(A,B) + d(B,C) > d(A,C)
however, this might not always be the case
panda = koalas
kangeroos = koalas
but panda /= kangeroos
can be solved by limiting the attention to only one factor
explain the feature models
humans view similarity based on the number of similar features that the objects show
more similar features = more similar
common element model
only focuses on the similar features
tversky’s model
also focuses on different elements
selective attention comes into play
if the person decides to put more attention to the differences = less similar
if the person decides to put more attention to the similarities = more similar
solved symmetrical constraints and asymmetrical similarities
explain structural alignments
based on the placements of the objects in the pictures
more MIPs = more similar
MOPs also increase similarities, but to a smaller extent
transformation
more transformation = less similar
What are the two issues that similarities fail to explain in decision making
the degree of variability of an object and dissociation between categorisation and similarity
whose theory is the closest with ‘relational processing’?
Goldstone and structural alignment