Sign Language Linguistics Flashcards

1
Q

Prominent Sign Languages

A
  • BSL
  • Auslan
  • Based off BSL
  • Lopsided mutual intelligibility (Auslan users understand BSL better than the converse)
  • ASL
  • Varieties like Black ASL (a sociolect)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

ASL vs Black ASL comparison

A
  1. Hands / Symmetry
    * ASL: 1 hand
    * BlAsl: 2 hands
  2. Lexical Differences
  3. SLs socialised differently
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Tactile Sign Languages

A

Feeling movements / shapes of the signer’s hand to accomodate blindness. (Multimodal transmission of seeing + feeling)

eg
* tactile Auslan
* protactile ASL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Nicaraguan Sign Language

A
  • Relatively ‘new’ sign language
  • developed within the last 50 years
  • first-gen deaf children in Nicaragua were languageless
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

International Sign

A
  • Influenced by BSL + ASL
  • Largely eurocentric
  • Pidgin of the SL world
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Deaf / hearing interactions

A

Assymetrical Communication
* can fall back on writing as a common medium when gesturing falls short

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hearing signing

A

Hearing speakers can also sign with or without speech.
* can be environmental: hearing speakers in largely deaf communities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Alternate Sign Languages

A

Usually indigenous
* hand-talk / sand-talk
* can be used with or without speech for cultural and pragmatic reasons
* sign can be learned alongside or even before speech in such communities and shows intergenerational transmission
* sociocultural identity based on spoken languages and inherited connections to country rather than on sign

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Types of Sign Languages

A

Many different signing ecologies and practices have been described using many different classifications.

eg:
* SL vs gesture?
* urban vs rural
* institutionalised / standard vs indigenous / alternate?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Assumption: Developmental Cline

A

National / urban SL
Village / rural / shared SL
Communal / rural / family homesign
Homesign
Gesture

Issues:
* Assumption that gesture is basic, national SL is developed.
* Rural SLs risk being stigmatised / minoritised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

National / urban SL

A
  • Initiated in home sign contexts, but developed across networks of families and evolved in schools for deaf
  • Shaped by institutionalisation
  • Network of signers mostly unrelated to one another
  • National SL often imported from one country to another
  • Used in large deaf communities (usually urban) and multigenerational
  • will display regional variation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Assumption: Speech continuum

A

Gesticulations (obligatory presence of speech, not linguistic)
Emblems (optional presence of speech, some linguistic properties eg Thumbs up)
Pantomime (obligatory absence of speech, not linguistic)
SL (obligatory absence of speech, linguistic)

Issues:
* boundaries of what is (non)linguistic is abstract
* fails to capture the interchangeable uses of gesture and sign

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Case study: Auslan

A
  • not signed English (but many Auslan signs are used in ASE)
  • based on BSL due to colonial history, and also related to NZSL and other Pacific sign languages
  • geographical divide along a N/S axis
  • ~10,000 profoundly deaf signers, with many more hearing signers
  • systematically underrepresented in education, health, policing, laws etc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Indigenous / vilage / rural / shared SL

A
  • small, often rural communities (usually with high incidences of hereditary deafness)
  • relatively bounded communities, but still multigenerational (exposed to different types of socialisation)
  • Shared signing communities: community-wide interaction across both deaf and hearing people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Case study: Adamarobe SL

A
  • Shared signing community in Southern Ghana
  • AdaSL used by all deaf people and large numbers of hearing Akan-speaking people in the village
  • Schools teach GSL, derived from ASL
  • Hearing villagers emphasise shared roots of AdaSL and Akan, and deaf villagers describe Akan, AdaSL and GSL as 3 distinct but equivalent languages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Family Sign Languages

A

Primary site of SL use is the family ecology
* families often have multiple deaf members
* usually rural contexts

Evolves as a product of communication between both deaf people and hearing family members across multiple generations

The SL context is usually domestic or home-oriented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Case study: Making Hands

A

San Juan Quiahije Chatino (making hands) evolved between deaf Chatino people and their hearing family (cf: homesign)

As of 2019, up to 13 deaf in a village of 3500 without access to LSM (national sign languages are assymetric as they are governed by resource and access)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Homesign

A
  • emerges in communication of deaf people who are not exposed to a sign language with their families due to oralism
  • a homesigner is a deaf person who does not have access to a conventional sign language (cf: language deprivation)
  • associated with children in nuclear families
  • usually individual and idiosyncratic to the deaf individual (not intergenerational)
  • characterised by frequently unsuccessful communication attempts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Rural Homesign

A

Signing practices of isolated deaf people in rural areas where gesturing / signing with hearing people is considered the natural way of communicating.
* most likely intergenerational
* characterised by one deaf who is not in regular contact with other deaf, but who is at the nucleus of a network of regular contact with fluent, prototypically hearing signers who may or may not be related with one another

  • often co-occurs with extensive systems of conventional gestures to draw upon
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Case Study: PNG

A

Contains deaf signers who sign with people who are not exclusively family members, while also experiencing little to no contact with other deaf people
* able to communicate about most things with ease (not quite homesign as the signers are able to communicate with one another; not idiosyncratic)
* little in common between these cases and traditional ‘oralist’ homesign

19
Q

Signing systems / Languages

A

Signing system =
* spoken lang + signs

=/=

Sign language

20
Q

Issues affecting deaf people / communities

A
  1. Language deprivation
  2. Communication access
  3. Disability dongles
  4. Media representation
21
Q

Language deprivation

A
  • results from a chronic lack of full access to a natural language (SLs are natural languages!) during the critical period of language acquisition before age five.
  • results from linguistic neglect
  • symptoms: language dysfluency, fund of knowledge deficits, disruptions in thinking, mood / behaviour
  • lifelong social, economic and psychological consequences
22
Audism
Atttitude based on **pathological thinking** that results in a negative stigma towards anyone who does not hear. * judges, labels and limits individuals depending on whether a person hears and speaks * manifests as a range of behaviours, actions and systems that function to oppress deaf people by vieweing deafness as a problem to be fixed. * interacts with other forms of oppression (eg Migrant backgrounds)
23
Audism Case Study: Cochlear Implants
Key issue: deaf kids with implants treated as hearing --> occludes the fact that they can and will struggle with hearing. * gap between the two test demographics is widening * Future decline in comprehension ability, some plateau at low levels
24
Language deprivation is preventable
* speech-only approaches do not guarantee deaf children will acquire a robust and resilient first language * no evidence that learning and using SL causes harm for deaf children * signing proficiency in a deaf signed language offers many benefits to cognitive, social and emotional wellbeing * challenge is how to support "health global lamguage" development in various contexts
25
Importance of SL access
Language is a cornerstone of neural development. * brain is not fussy about modality; it just needs early input from **accessible language** * SL can provide an accessible **first language** (even if families are focusing on spoken lang development, SL is a strong safety net) * status of SL and human rights * challenge prevailing audist ideologies
26
Communication Access
* accessibility options for different types of deaf people: interpreters, translation, captions * two key barriers: (1) service provision; (2) funding
27
Disability dongles
A well-intended elegant, yet useless solution to a problem we never knew we had. * ususally the result of an able-centric techno-messiahnic complex * based on assumptons about disability rather than practical lived experiences * conceived and developed without talkng to or working with the actual disabled community * can be useless and even harmful in perpetuating false ideas about accessibility
27
28
Media Representation
* an issue for all minoritised / marginalised communities * reinforce stereotypes or obfuscate accurate depictions of lived experiences * issues range from a lack of representation through to even **unwanted representation** (or cultual appropriation)
29
30
Deaf gain
The **othering** of deafness * medical perspectives of deafness are based on ableist standards of "normalcy" * deaf gain: reframing "deaf" not as "hearing loss", but as a form of sensory and cognitive diversity that has the potential to contribute to the greater good of humanity * emerge from the experience of deafness to also benefit the non-deaf
30
31
Semiotics in SL Analysis
Sign --> Meaning * not all conventional meanings * may include non-linguistic elements
32
Sign Language Semiotic Resources
From Most to least conventionalised * Fully lexicalised manual signs * Fingerspelling * Mouthing of English words * Pointing actions * Depicting signs * Mouth gestures * Manual gestures * Enactment
33
Issues in sign language linguistic methods
1. Issues of theory 2. Issues in data collection 3. Issues in sign language description (phonology, morphology, lexicon, syntax)
33
34
Corpus Linguistics
A method for systematically investigating patterns of language variation and use across large samples of language users. Documenting, archiving and creating machine-readable data that is somehow representative of specific language users. Allows us to differentiate what is shared across social networks from what is specific to individuals within these networks. Method: Undergo a series of tasks --> archived + annotated ==> machine analysed
35
Sign Language Corpora
Useful and necessary for the documentation and description of SL, which are characterised by extensive variation Corpus methods developed to address issues with traditional grammaticality judgements Sign language corpora typically focuses on specific cohorts of signers (eg native signers) from different regions, doing different tasks. Capitalises on advances in digital technology
36
Case Study: Auslan Corpus
Digital video archive of Auslan used by deaf **native or early learner (near native)** users. [acquired before age of 1] Three hours of language-based activity including **interviews, narratives, responses to survey questions, free conversation** and other **elicitation stimuli** ~300 hours of unedited footage from 100 participants from 5 cities Uses ELAN= the signed version of PRAAT * time-by-time gloss [Metadata] = information about participants * geographical information
37
Issues with corpus methods
* Corpora are rarely not representative of entire signing communities (most signers in the Auslan Corpus are non-indigenous white deaf Australians, because **cultural and/or ethnic background was not used as a sampling variable**) = deficient metadata, sampling biases and missing information * Aspects of sociality of signers not central to data * Signers who learned Auslan later in life also not included, despite representing most of the signing community * A corpus can rarely if never, claim to be entirely balanced and representative: it can only be described in terms of how it is balanced and representative
38
39
Linguistic Ethnography
Linguistic ethnography is an umbrella term for an **interdisciplinary community of scholars bringing together linguistic and ethnographic methodologies in the study of language use in social life** Range of disciplinary backgrounds and a wide variety of methodologies Allows researchers to 'open up' the complexities of the everyday communicative lives of individuals and 'tie down' those ethnograhic insights with detailed linguistic analyses of communicative practice **Understand language and communication in the real world**
40
Linguistic ethnography in deaf communities
* new platform to investigate the diversity of language practices within the global deaf population * also challenges **essentialist categorisations of deaf populations** and their signing practices = neglects the linguistic / physical varieties within the death population itself (deaf and deafblind) * expand our awareness of the languaging and translanguaging of deaf individuals * draw attention to aspects of the social ecologies in which deaf individuals live, such as existing language ideologies, that impact their communicative practices and everyday lives
41
Linguistic ethnography methods and data
Methods: Participant obsservation, interviews, fieldnotes and the collection of documents like policy documents and local flyers * can involve extended fieldwork with signing communities, learning as well as conducting research in the language of these communities * video recording is fundamental for capturing language data * can use elicited data, but many focus on capturing unprompted, naturally occurring interactions
42
Linguistic ethnography as engagement
LE research is designed through and with community engagement, but needs to be cognisant of the impact of the researcher of the community. * eg: LE may involve action-based and participatory methods that actively involve members of the community in data * tends to involve more reflexive engagement from researchers * Projects are often designed with the goal of producing resources for the community, such as language curricula, language planning documents, and deaf education programs. * Also prioritize sharing research with public audiences, such as by producing ethnographic films like Ishaare.
43
Semiotic Resources in AusEng
From most to least conventionalised: * fully lexicalised spoken words * fingerspelling? * mouthing of words? * pointing actions * depicting signs * mouth gestures? * manual gestures (usually follow some beat / cadence) * enactment
44
Sign Language "Phonology"
Is the term accurate since SLs do not use phones? Signs are governed by * handshape * location * orientation * movement