Sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection Flashcards

1
Q

Section and Penalty

A

CA61; S128(1)(b)

20 Years Imp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection

Elements

A

1. A person:
- Gender neutral
RTS

2. Has unlawful sexual connection with:
- Definition (eg sexual connection as per CA61; s2, and when this becomes unlawful sexual connection).
- Genitalia / Penis / Vagina / Tongue R v Koroheke / CA61 s2
- Penetration / contact / R v Koroheke and how evidence of penetration can be established
- Consent (lack thereof) / R v Cox / R v Gutuama / R v Koroheke / R v Adams
- CA61; 128A (invalid consent)
- Subjective/Objective test
RTS

3. Another person:
- Gender neutral, age irrelevant to the charge
RTS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Person

A

It is a gender neutral offence and can be committed by a male or a female. The fact that the offender is a ‘person’ is generally accepted by judicial notice or proved by circumstantial evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Unlawful Sexual Connection - Definition

A

CA61; S128(3)

Person A has unlawful sexual connection with person B if person A has sexual connection with person B—

(a) without person B’s consent to the connection; and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sexual Connection

A

CA61; S2

Sexual connection means—
(a) connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes, of—

(i) a part of the body of another person; or
(ii) an object held or manipulated by another person; or

(b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another person’s genitalia or anus; or
(c) the continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Introduction / Penetration

A

CA61; S2(1A)

Introduction and penetration have the same meaning. Introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Proof of penetration is required

A

Proof of penetration may be established by:

  • Complainant’s evidence
  • Medical examination, including physical injuries and DNA evidence
  • The defendant’s admissions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Genitalia

A

CA61; S2

Genitalia includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ, analogous to a naturally occurring male or female genitalia (whether the person concerned is male, female or of indeterminate sex).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Koroheke

Genitalia

A

R v Koroheke

The genitalia comprise the reproduction organs, interior and exterior … they include the vulva and the labia, both interior and exterior at the opening of the vagina.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Penis

A

S2 CA61

Penis includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to a naturally occurring penis (whether the person concerned is male, female or of indeterminate sex).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Consent

A

Consent is a person’s conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Cox

A

Consent must be full, voluntary, free and informed… freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Koroheke - Consent

A

It is important to distinguish between consent that is freely given and submission by a woman to what she may regard as unwanted but unavoidable. For example, submission by a woman because she is frightened of what might happen if she does not give in or co-operate, is not true consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Matters that do not constitute consent

A

S128A CA61

CA61; S128A

A person does not consent to sexual activity:

(1) Just because he or she does not Protest or offer physical resistance to the activity
(2) With another person if he or she allows the sexual activity because he or she is mistaken about the other person’s Identity.
(3) If he or she allows the act because he or she is mistaken about its Nature and quality.

(4) If he or she allows the activity because of
- Force applied to him or her or some other person
- The threat (express or implied) of the application of force to him or her or some other person
- The fear of the application of force to him or her or some other person

(5) If the activity occurs while he or she is Asleep or unconscious.
(6) If the activity occurs while he or she is affected by an Intellectual, mental, or physical condition or impairment of such a nature and degree that he or she cannot consent or refuse to consent to the activity.
(7) If the activity occurs while he or she is so affected by Alcohol or some other drug that he or she cannot consent or refuse to consent to the activity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reasonable Grounds Three Step Process

Step 1 - Subjective Test - Absence of Consent

A

Whether or not the complainant was consenting is a subjective test from the complainant’s point of view, ie what was the complainant thinking at the time?

The Crown must prove that the complainant was not consenting to the sexual act at the time it occurred - it is not for the defendant to prove that he/she was consenting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Reasonable Grounds Three Step Process

Step 2 - Subjective Test - Belief in Consent

A

If it is established that the complainant was not consenting, the next question is whether or not the defendant believed he/she was consenting at the time. This is a purely subjective test from the defendant’s point of view, ie what was the defendant thinking at the time?

If he/she did believe he/she was consenting, an objective test must then be applied to determine whether there was a reasonable basis for his/her belief.

17
Q

Reasonable Grounds Three Step Process

Step 3 - Objective Test - Reasonable Grounds for Belief in Consent

A

What would a reasonable person have believed if placed in the same position as the defendant?

If a reasonable person would, in the same circumstances, have believed the complainant was consenting, the jury may well acquit the defendant. If a reasonable person would not have believed he/she was consenting, the jury is more likely to convict.

18
Q

R v Gutuama

A

Under the objective test, the crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting.

19
Q

No presumption because of age

A

CA61; S127

There is no presumption of law that a person is incapable of sexual connection because of his or her age.