Sexual Violation by Rape Flashcards
What is the Section, Subsection and Act of Sexual Violation by Rape?
Section 128(1)(a), Crimes Act 1961
What is Sexual Violation Defined?
Sexual Violation is the act of a person who rapes another person, or has unlawful sexual connection with another person
What are the elements of Sexual Violation by Rape?
A person rapes another person
What is the definition of a person?
Accepted by judicial notice or proved by circumstantial evidence.
What must a person have to rape?
A penis.
Under Section 128 of the Crimes Act 1961, what is rape defined?
Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B’s genitalia by person A’s penis,
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection, and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.
Under Section 2(1A) of the Crimes Act 1961, what is penetration defined?
Introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
How may proof of penetration be established?
The complainant’s evidence, medical examination and offenders admissions.
Under Section 2 of the Crimes Act 1961, what is Unlawful Sexual Connection defined?
(a) Connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise for genuine medical purposes, of
(i) the part of the body of another person, or
(ii) an object held or manipulated by another person, or
(b) Connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and another person’s genitalia or anus, or
(c) The continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph’s (a) and (b).
What is an example of case law regarding the definition of genitalia?
R v Koroheke
The genitalia comprise the reproduction organs, interior and exterior.
The involve the vulva (and) labia, both the interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina.
What is consent defined?
Consent is a persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired and proposed by another.
What three things must the Crown prove regarding Consent?
The complainant did not consent to the sexual act (subjective text), and
The offender did not believe the complainant was consenting (subjective text) , and
If he did believe she was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable (objective text).
Name two examples of case law relevant to consent?
R v Cox and R v Gutuama.
Explain R v Cox?
Consent must be full, voluntary, free and informed, freely and voluntary given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement.
Explain R v Gutuama?
Under the objective test, the crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought (the complainant) was consenting.