Serious Assault Flashcards
What are the section’s, subsections and the act that covers Wounding with Intent?
Section 188 (1) & (2) of the Crimes Act 1961
Explain Section 188 (1) of the Crimes Act 1961?
Everyone is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years who, with intent to wound or, maim or, disfigure or, cause grievous bodily harm to any one, wounds or maims or disfigures or causes grievous bodily harm to any person.
Explain Section 188 (2) of the Crimes Act 1961?
Everyone is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who, with intent to injure, or with reckless disregard for the safety of others, wounds, maims, disfigures, or causes grievous bodily harm, to any person.
What are the elements for wounding with intent, Section 188 (1) of the Crimes Act 1961?
With intent to cause grievous bodily harm, to any person, wounds or maims or disfigures or causes grievous bodily harm, to any person.
What are the elements for wounding with intent, section 188 (2) of the Crimes Act 1961.
With intent to injure, or with reckless disregard for the safety of others, wounds or maims or disfigures or causes grievous bodily harm, to any person.
Regarding with intent to cause GBH, what two things must the offender show intention of?
To commit the act and to get a specific result.
What does intent mean?
That an act or omission must be done deliberately. The act or omission must be more than involuntary or accidental.
What are two examples of case law regarding intent to cause GBH?
R v Taisalika and R v Collister.
What is R v Taisalika?
The nature of the blow and gash which it produced point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent.
What is R v Collister?
Circumstantial evidence from which the offenders intent may be inferred can include:
The offenders actions and words, before , during and after the event.
The surrounding circumstances.
The nature of the act itself.
What is grievous bodily harm?
Harm that is really serious.
What is an example of case law regarding the definition of grievous bodily harm.
DPP v Smith
What is DPP v Smith?
‘Bodily harm’ needs to explanation, and ‘grievous’ means no more or no less than “really serious”.
What is a person?
Accepted by judicial notice or proved by circumstantial evidence.
is age or gender relevant to the offence of Wounding with intent?
No.
What is malice?
The desire to harm someone, ill will.
According to Section 2 of the Crimes Act 1961, what is the definition of injure?
To cause actual bodily harm.
Name the case law regrading the definition of bodily harm.
R v McArthur.
Name the case law regarding the definition of wounds.
R v Waters
According to case law, what is the definition of wounds?
A wound is the breaking of the skin evidenced by the flow of blood. May be external or internal.