Sexual Offences Flashcards
What is the definition of genitalia and what is the relevant case law?
The external organs of reproduction. The term genitalia literally means the organs of generation, and therefore it does not include pubic hair or breasts. It includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occurring male or female genitalia (whether the person concerned is male, female, or of indeterminate sex)
The relevant case law is R V Koroheke - the genitalia comprise the reproduction organs, interior and exterior. They include the vulva and labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina.
What is the definition of a penis?
The male organ of reproduction. It includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to a naturally occurring penis (whether the person concerned is male, female, or of indeterminate sex)
Proof of penetration can be established by what 3 things?
- The complainant’s evidence
- A medical examination including injuries and DNA evidence
- The defendant’s admissions.
What is the definition of rape?
128(2)
Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B’s genitalia by person A’s penis
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection AND
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consented to the connection
What are the ‘tops and sides’ of rape?
Crimes Act 1961 section 128(1)(a)
Max 20 year imprisonment
A person
Rapes
Another person.
What is the definition of consent?
Consent is a persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another.
What are the different tests relating to consent?
Subjective test - what was the victim thinking at the time?
Subjective test - belief in consent - what was the defendant thinking at the time?
Objective test - what would a reasonable person have believed if placed in the same position as the defendant?
What is the definition of ‘sexual connection’ outlined in Section 2?
(a) Connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes, of
(i) A part of the body of another person, or
(ii) An object held or manipulated by another person, or
(b) Connection between the mouth and tongue of one person and a part of another person’s genitalia or anus, or
(c) the continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b)
What are the ‘tops and sides’ of sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection?
Crimes Act 1961, Section 128 (1) (b)
Max imprisonment 20 years
A person
Has unlawful sexual connection
with another person.
Describe what connection in regards to ‘mouth and tongue’ is required in unlawful sexual connection?
In the case of oral sexual connection, it is not necessary for there to be any penetration. Any touching of a person’s genitalia or anus with another person’s mouth or tongue is sufficient.
Describe where the term ‘a continuation of such acts’ fits into unlawful sexual connection?
This captures situations where sexual activity is commenced consensually, but consent is later withdrawn.
There is an obligation on a person to stop sexual activity at the point they realise the other person is, or may be no longer willing.
What was held in R V Cox?
Consent must be full, voluntary, free and informed, given freely and voluntarily by a person in a position to make a rational judgment.
It goes further regarding children consenting to sex:
Even where she indicates an agreement to the act occurring, no reasonable adult would have grounds for believing that a ten or eleven year old girl has the experience or maturity to understand the nature and significance of the act.
What was held in R V Gutuama?
Under the objective test the crown must prove that no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought the complainant was consenting.
Section 128A covers that - allowing sexual activity does not amount to consent in some circumstances.
What are they?
1FADIMN
(1) A person does not consent to sexual activity just because he or she does not protest or offer physical resistance to the activity.
(2) A person does not consent to sexual activity if he or she allows the activity because of—
(a) force applied to him or her or some other person; or
(b) the threat (express or implied) of the application of force to him or her or some other person; or
(c) the fear of the application of force to him or her or some other person.
(R v KOROHEKE)
(3) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is asleep or unconscious.
(4) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is so affected by alcohol or some other drug that he or she cannot consent or refuse to consent to the activity. (Cannot understand the situation and give rational or reasoned consent)
(5) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is affected by an intellectual, mental, or physical condition or impairment of such a nature and degree that he or she cannot consent or refuse to consent to the activity.
(6) One person does not consent to sexual activity with another person if he or she allows the sexual activity because he or she is mistaken about who the other person is.
(7) A person does not consent to an act of sexual activity if he or she allows the act because he or she is mistaken about its nature and quality.
(This includes indecent acts that without the persons’s consent would be an indecent assault)
What case law relates to fear of force in sexual offence cases?
R V Koroheke states;
It is important to distinguish between consent that is freely given, and submission by a woman to what she may regard as unwanted but unavoidable.
For example, submission by a woman because she is frightened of what might happen if she does not give in or cooperate, is not true consent.
When must consent be given?
At the time of the sexual activity.
With regards to ‘penetration’ and ‘introduction into’ what extent of penetration is required for sexual violation?
These two terms mean the same thing.
Section 2(1A) Introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
Any degree of penetration, no matter how slight or fleeting, is sufficient.
What are the acts and sections for attempted sexual violation and assault wth intent to commit sexual violation?
What are the elements?
Attempted sexual violation
Crimes Act 1961, Section 129 (1)
Max 10 years imprisonment
A person
Attempts to commit sexual violation
Assault with intent to commit sexual violation
Crimes Act 1961, Section 129(2)
Max 10 years imprisonment
A person
Assaults another person
With intent to commit sexual violation of the other person.
What intention is required by the defendant in attempted sexual violation?
The defendant intended to commit the full act of sexual violation, and acted as he did for the purpose of achieving that aim.
What must the crown prove in attempted sexual violation?
- the defendant intended to have sexual connection with the complainant, and
- took a real and substantive step toward that aim, and
- the complainant did not consent to the intended sexual connection, and
- the defendant did not believe in reasonable grounds that the complainant was consenting.
(Not believing on reasonable grounds includes being reckless as to whether or not the complainant was consenting)
What case law relates to attempts?
R V Harpur states that an attempt is an act or omission constituting a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in his commission of the crime.
The defendants conduct can be viewed cumulatively up to a point where the conduct in question stops. Considering what remains to be done is relevant, though not determinative.
Attempts - question of law.
What must be proved for assault with intent to commit sexual violation?
It must be proved that at the time the defendant assaulted (must be proof of assault) the complainant he;
- Intended to have sexual connection with the complainant, and
- the complainant did not consent to the sexual connection, and
- the defendant did not believe in reasonable grounds that the complainant was consenting.
What is the best evidence to prove a child or young person’s age?
What case law relates to this?
The best evidence is a birth certificate and a person who can identify the child (eg. Mother)
R V Forrest and Forrest states that the best possible evidence in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of the victim’s age. Eg a birth certificate and a person who can identify the child.