Serious assaults Flashcards

1
Q

What is the definition of maiming?

A

Mutilate, cripple, or disable a part of the body so as to deprive the victim of the use of a limb or one of the senses. (There needs to be a degree of permanence)

An example of maiming is to cut someone’s finger off

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of a wound?

A

A break of the skin and the flow of blood either internally or externally.

(R V WATERS)

Example of a wound is a deep laceration to a persons’s arm as a result of being stabbed with a knife.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the definition of disfigure?

A

To deform or deface. To mar or alter a persons appearance.

R V RAPANA and MURRAY states that disfigure covers both permanent and temporary damage.

Example - tattoo on face.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the definition of GBH?

A

Harm that is really serious, or really seriously hurts

DPP V SMITH states that bodily harm needs no explanation. Grievous simply means no more and no less than harm that is really serious.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the doctrine of transferred malice?

A

It is not necessary that the person suffering the harm is the intended victim.

If the offender had an intent to harm one person, but the harm is accidentally inflicted on another, he is still criminally responsible to the harm inflicted on the unintended victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is R V Taisalika and what does it relate to?

A

The nature of the blow and the gash it produced on the complainant’s head points strongly to the necessary intent required.

This relates to intent and shows that the offenders actions alone were deliberate. Intent can be inferred from the offender’s action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is R V Waters and what does it relate to?

A

The break if the skin and a flow of blood either internally or externally.

This relates to the definition of a wound.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the different between GBH and wounds, maims, disfigures etc?

A

GBH relates to the seriousness of the injury, and wounds etc are specific types of injuries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is actual bodily harm? And what case law is relevant?

A

Bodily harm may be an internal or external injury and need not be permanent or dangerous.

It can also include a psychiatric illness.

R V Donovan states that bodily harm is any hurt or injury that is calculated to interfere with the health and comfort of the victim. It need not be permanent, but it must be more than transitory or trifling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the definition of a reckless act, and what case law relates?

A

A reckless act is the taking of an unjustifiable risk.

R V Harney states that it is the conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk. In NZ it requires proof that the consequences could well happen, and an intention to continue the conduct regardless of the risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the intents in 191 (1) (a) (b) and (c)?

A

(a) to commit or facilitate the commission of an imprisonable offence
(b) to avoid detection of himself or any other person in the commission of an imprisonable offence
(c) to avoid arrest or facilitate the flight of himself or of any other person upon the commission OR ATTEMPTED commission of any imprisonable offence

Ensure you cover off that the intent is to eg. Facilitate the flight of himself. This is the main intent.Then later when you cover off the wound, you cover intent (Taisalika) and that they intended to cause the specified harm (Tihi)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is R V Tihi and what does it relate to?

A

Relates to 191 (1) (a) (b) and (c) - aggravated wounding.

The two fold intent test for aggravated wounding. The crown must prove one of the intents in (a) (b) or (c), and that the accused meant to cause the specified harm, or foresaw that his actions were likely to expose others to the risk of suffering it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is R V Sturm and what does it relate to?

A

It relates to Aggravated wounding 191 (1) (a)

It is not necessary for the prosecution to prove that the intended crime was subsequently committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does facilitate mean?

A

To make possible or to make it easier.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is R V Wati and what does it relate to?

A

It relates to aggravated wounding 191 (1) (c)

The prosecution must prove the commission or attempted commission of an imprisonable offence, and prove that 191 (1) (c) is caused to enable the offenders to more easily escape or prevent their capture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is violent means? What is the relevant case law?

A

Violent means is the application of force that physically incapacitates a person. However, it is not limited to physical violence and includes threats of violence that render a person incapable of resistance

R V Crossan states that incapable of resistance includes a powerlessness of will, as well as a physical incapacity.

An example of this is pointing a firearm at someone and threatening to shoot if the person does not submit to sexual intercourse.

17
Q

What does it mean to render a person unconscious?

A

The defendants actions cause a person to lose consciousness.

An example of this is to knock someone out by punching them in the face, or by strangling a person until they pass out.

18
Q

What is the definition of stupefy? And what is the relevant case law?

A

To stupefy means to induce a state of stupor, to make stupid, groggy, or insensible.

R V Sturm states that stupefy means to cause an effect in the mind or nervous system which really seriously interferes with that person’s mental or physical ability to act in any way which might hinder an intended crime.

An example of this is spiking someone’s drink with drugs to dull their senses.

19
Q

What are some examples of circumstantial evidence in which an offenders intent may be inferred?

A
  • The offenders actions and words before, during or after an event
  • The surrounding circumstances
  • The nature of the offence itself.
20
Q

What are some examples that could help prove intent in serious assault cases?

A
  • Prior threats
  • Weapons used - were they purposely brought?
  • Evidence of premeditation
  • The number of blows
  • The degree of force used
  • Body parts targeted
  • The degree of resistance or helplessness of the victim
21
Q

What are the two specific types of intent?

A
  1. Intent to do a deliberate act (more than involuntary or accidental)
  2. An intention to produce a specific result (outcome)
22
Q

What was held in R V Collister?

A

Although no express demand for money was made, the defendant’s intent could be inferred by the circumstances.

23
Q

What is the act and section of aggravated wounding?

Max imprisonment?

A

Crimes Act 1961 section 191 1 (a) (b) (c)

14 yrs

24
Q

What is the act and section of wounding with intent to cause GBH?

Max imprisonment?

A

Crimes Act 1961 section 188 (1)

14 yrs

25
Q

What is the act and section of wounding with intent to injure (or reckless disregard)

Max imprisonment?

A

Crimes Act 1961 section 188(2)

7 yrs

26
Q

What is the act and section of injuring with intent to cause GBH?

Max imprisonment?

A

Crimes Act 1961 section 189 (1)

10 yrs

27
Q

What is the act and section of injuries with intent to injure (or reckless disregard)

Max imprisonment?

A

Crimes Act 1961 section 189 (2)

5 yrs