Sex offences Flashcards
Sexual violation by rape (Elements)
Section 128(1)(a) Crimes Act 1961
- A person
- Rapes
- Another person
Rape (Definition)
Section 128(2) Crimes Act 1961
Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B’s genitalia by person A’s penis,—
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection; and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection. -
Sexual connection (Definition)
Section 2 Crimes Act 1961
a) connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes, of—
(i) a part of the body of another person; or
(ii) an object held or manipulated by another person; or
(b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another person’s genitalia or anus -
Penetration (Definition)
Section 2(1A) Crimes Act 1961
Introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection. Proof of penetration may be established by complainants’ evidence, medical
examination, defendants’ admissions. -
Genitalia (Case Law)
R v Koroheke
The genitalia comprise the reproduction organs, interior and exterior. They include the vulva [and] the labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina.
Consent (Definition)
Consent is a person’s conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another
Consent (Case Law)
R V COX
Consent must be “full, voluntary, free and informed freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgment.”
R V GUTUAMA
Under the objective test the Crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that [the complainant] was consenting”.
R v KOROHEKE
It is important to distinguish between consent that is freely given and submission by a woman to what she may regard as unwanted but unavoidable. For example, submission by a woman because she is frightened of what might happen if she does not give in or co-operate, is not true consent.
Sexual Violation by U/L sexual connection (Elements)
Section 128(1)(b) Crimes Act 1961
- A person
- Has unlawful sexual connection
- with another person
Unlawful sexual connection (Definition)
Section 128(3) Crimes Act 1961
Person A has unlawful sexual connection with person B if person A has sexual connection with person B—
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection; and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.
Assault with intent to commit sexual violation (Elements)
Section 129(2) Crimes Act 1961
- A person
- Assaults another person
- With intent to commit sexual violation of the other person
Assault (Definition)
Section 2 Crimes Act 1961
Means the act of intentionally applying or attempting to apply force to the person of another directly or indirectly
Assault with intent to commit sexual violation -Intent
It must be proved that at the time the defendant assaulted the complainant they:
* intended to have sexual connection with the complainant, and
* the complainant did not consent to the sexual connection, and
* the defendant did not believe on reasonable grounds that the
complainant was consenting
Intent (Definition)
Intention to commit an act to get a specific result
Intent (Case Law)
R v COLLISTER
Circumstantial evidence which the offenders intent maybe inferred can include; actions/words before during or after the event. Surrounding circumstances or the act itself
Sexual conduct with a child u/12 (Elements)
Section 132(1) Crimes Act 1961
- A person
- Has sexual connection
- With a child
Defence for child u/12
Section 132 Crimes Act 1961
4) It is not a defence to a charge under this section that the person charged
believed that the child was of or over the age of 12 years.
(5) It is not a defence to a charge under this section that the child
consented
Child (Definition)
Section 132(6)(a) Crimes Act 1961
In this section child means a person under the age of 12 years
Age (Case Law)
R V FORREST AND FORREST
“The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of [the victim’s] age.”