Robbery Flashcards
Robbery (Elements)
Section 234(1) Crimes Act 1961
* Theft
* Accompanied by violence or Accompanied by threats of violence
* To any person or Property
* Used to extort the property stolen or To prevent or overcome resistance to its being stolen
Theft (Definition)
Dishonestly and without claim of right takes any property with intent to deprive the owner permanently of that property – (Section 219(1)(a) Crimes Act 1961)
Theft (Case Law)
R v LAPIER:
Robbery is complete the instant property is taken even if possession by the thief is only momentary
R v COX:
Two elements; Actual or potential custody or control and knowledge in the sense of awareness by the accused the substance is in his possession
Accompanied by violence (Case Law)
R v MAIHI:
There must be a link between the act of stealing and a threat of violence. Both must be present
PENEHA v POLICE:
The actions forcibly interfere with personal freedom or amount to violent action or motion causing bodily injury or discomfort
Threats of violence (Case Law)
R v BROUGHTON:
Threat of violence is the manifestation of an intention to inflict violence unless property handed over. The threat may be conveyed by words or conduct or both
R v PACHOLKO:
It is the conduct of the accused which has to be assessed rather than the strength of the nerves of the person threatened
Extort (Definition)
Obtain by coercion or intimidation
Prevent (Definition)
Keep from happening
Overcome (Definition)
Defeat, prevail or get the better of
Aggravated Robbery - GBH (Elements)
Section 235(a) Crimes Act 1961
* Robs
* Any person
* At the time of or immediately before or immediately after the robbery, causes GBH
* To any person
Robs (Definition)
Theft accompanied by violence or accompanied by threats of violence to any person or property used to extort the property stolen or to prevent or overcome its being stolen -Section 234(1) Crimes Act 1961
GBH (Definition)
Harm that is really serious
GBH (Case Law)
DPP v SMITH:
Grievous means no more and no less than really serious
Aggravated robbery - being together (Elements)
Section 235(b) Crimes Act 1961
* Being together with any other person or persons
* Robs
* Any person
Together with (Definition)
Two or more people present and acting together in the commission of the robbery
Together with (Case Law)
R v JOYCE:
Crown must prove two or more people were present at the time the robbery was committed or when the assault occurred
R v GALEY
“two or more persons having the common intention to use their combined force, either in any event or as circumstances might require, directly in the perpetration of the crime