Sex and Gender - Kohlberg's theory Flashcards
Cognitive explanations of gender
- based on the idea that a child’s understanding of gender becomes more sophisticated with age
- due to brain and thought maturation
What are Kohlberg’s three stages?
- Gender identity
- gender stability
- gender constancy
Gender identity
- Children begin to think about gender at approx. 2yo
- at 3, most children are able to identify others gender
- children believe that their sex can change
- they believe changing clothes changes a persons sex
Gender stability
- at the age of 4, children begin to realise that their sex will not change over time
- they are egocentric, so they don’t understand this applies to others too
- see certain characteristics as male or female
Gender constancy
- at 6 years old children understand that everyone’s gender is constant
- changes in outward appearance do not influence whether someone is male or female
- at this point children seek out role models to imitate to help them develop their sense of gender
Social learning theory and stereotyping
- children seek out gender appropriate role models to identify with and imitate
- embark upon an active search for evidence that confirms their gender
- tendency towards gender stereotyping begins to emerge
Strength - research support
P: research support
E: Damon - told children a story about a boy who liked to play with dolls
E: four year olds said it was ok, whereas six year old said he couldn’t
L: gender stages in real world situations
Counter argument to research support
C: other research challenges the idea that gender stereotyping occurs at age 6. Children as young as 4 reported “feeling good” when playing with gender appropriate toys and “bad” when doing the opposite
Limitation - methodological issues
P: relies on unsatisfactory methods
E: children understand gender through clothing because this is the culture they are brought up in
E: Bem - children were unable to demonstrate gender constancy when shown naked photos of children
L: the typical way of testing gender constancy may misrepresent what younger children actually know
Nature v nurture
- nature approach can be supported by cross cultural studies which suggest that cognitive changes are universal, therefore biological
- fails to account for socialisation. Social processes of imitation and observation as well as role models play a much more influential role in gender development