Session 3 - Behavioral Finance Flashcards
Traditional vs Behavioural
1/ traditional
– normative (ideal) how individuals and markets should behave
- grounded in neoclassical economics
- indvls are: risk-averse, self-interested, utility maximized
- markets are: efficient, prices incorporate and reflect all information
2/ behavioral
– descriptive (actual)
– observed indvl and markets behaviors
– grounded in psychology
– neither assume rationality nor efficient markets
Behavioral indvl or market focus
- 1/ individual focus (micro - BFMI)
- biases/errors impact financial decisions
- 2/ market focus (macro - BFMA)
- defects and describes market anomalies
- markets are subject to behavioral effects
Traditional view
- rational
- make decisions consistent with utility theory
- revise expectations consistent with Bayes’ formula
- self-interested, risk-averse, access to perfect information, process
all available information in an unbiased way
Utility under Traditional View and Basic Axioms underneath
- max PV of utility subject to a present value budget constraint
- basic axioms:
• completeness – well-defined preferences, ranked
• transitivity – 𝐀≻𝐁,𝐁≻𝐂 ⇒𝐀≻𝐂
• independence – 𝐀≻𝐁 ⇒ 𝐀 + 𝐱𝐂≻𝐁+ 𝐱𝐂
• continuity - 𝐀≻𝐁,𝐁≻𝐂⇒𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐀+𝐂~𝐁
Bayes
– given new information, decision maker is assumed to update beliefs about probabilities
𝐏(𝐔𝟏|𝐑) = 𝐏(𝐑|𝐔𝟏)/𝐏(𝐑) 𝐱 𝐏(𝐔𝟏)
Rational Economic Man
– will try to obtain the highest possible economic well being (utility) given
- budget constraints
- available information
- will not consider the well-being of others
- Perfect Rationality, Perfect Self-Interest, Perfert Information
Perfect Rationality
ability to reason and make beneficial judgments at all times
Perfect Self-Interest
humans are perfectly selfish
Perfect Information
all investors know all things at all times
∴ will always make the best decisions
Risk-Aversion
- utility functions are concave and show the diminishing marginal utility of wealth
- risk evaluation reference-dependent
- depends on the wealth level and circumstances of the decision-maker
Bounded rationality (under Behavioral view)
– choices may be rational but are subject to the limitations of knowledge & cognitive capacity (challenges perfect information)
Inner conflicts (under Behavioral view)
- short-term vs. long-term goals
- individual vs. social goals
Altruism
- challenges perfect self-interest
Prospect Theory/ Kahneman & Tuersky (79)
- an alternative to expected utility theory
- 2 phases to making a choice
- preference for risk-seeking or risk-averse behavior determined by attitudes towards gains & losses
- attitudes are defined relative to a reference point and not total wealth
- people tend to be risk-averse when there is a moderate to high probability of gains or a low probability of losses
- risk-seeking when there is a low probability of gains or a high probability of losses
Decision theory
– normative, concerned with identifying the ideal decision
- assumes decision-maker is fully informed, is able to make quantitative calculations with accuracy, and is perfectly rational
Simon (57) and satisficing
- people are not fully rational when making decisions and do not necessarily optimize but rather satisfice
- people have informational, intellectual, and computational limitations
- stop when they have arrived at a satisfactory decision
Satisfice (satisfy & suffice)
- cost & time of optimal outcomes too high
- complexity builds
- humans have ‘bounded rationality’
- decisions need only be adequate, not optimal
- individuals lack the cognitive resources to arrive at optimal solutions
e. g. - typically do not know relevant probabilities
- can rarely identify or evaluate all outcomes
- have weak & unreliable memories
Traditional at the market level
– prices incorporate and reflect all relevant info.
- individual-level ⇒ market participants are rational economic beings acting in their own self-interest and making optimal decisions
- when new relevant info. appears, expectations are updated and freely available to all participants
∴ markets are efficient
– prices are correct (i.e. = IV)
– no abnormal returns (i.e. risk-adjusted)
Weak form market efficiency
- no past price or volume info. can be used to generate abnormal returns
- technical analysis will not generate excess return
Semi-strong market efficiency
- all publicly available info. is reflected in prices - both TA & fund. the analysis will not generate excess r.
Strong Form market efficiency
- all public & private info is fully reflected in prices
- inside info will not generate excess return
Challenges to efficient market hypothesis
1) fundamental (e.g. small-cap & value companies)
2) technical
3) calendar (e.g. January effect)
Portfolio construction under the Traditional approach
– mean-variance efficient
⇒ the optimal portfolio given the investor’s risk tolerance
4 Approaches under Behavioural
1/ a behavioral approach to Consumption & Savings/
2/ a behavioral approach to asset pricing/
3/ behavioral portfolio theory/
4/ adaptive markets hypothesis/ (AMH
Behavioral approach to Consumption & Savings/
- people may focus on short-term satisfaction to the detriment of long-term goals
- people classify sources of wealth as:
1/ current income - high MPC (people lack self-control when it comes to current income)
2/ currently owned assets
3/ PV of future income - low MPC ∴ less likely to be consumed in short-term - people tend to frame their expenditure decisions taking into account their sources of wealth
- spend current income first, then spend based on current assets, then future income
- in contrast to the balance of short & long-term consumption plans of the life-cycle models
Behavioral approach to asset pricing/
- behavioral stochastic discount factor-based (SDF-based) asset pricing
models
SDF ⇒ investor sentiment relative to fundamental value - discount factor = TVM + fundamental factors + sentiment factor
= rf + fundamental premiums + sentiment premiums
Behavioral portfolio theory
– investors construct their portfolios in layers
Layer 1 – bonds, riskless assets
Layer 2 – investor is willing to take risk with residual wealth
Layer 3 – riskier, etc. …
➀ allocation to layers depends on investor goals (safety vs. growth)
➁ allocation within a layer depends on the goal set for the layer
➂ the more risk-averse, the less concentrated each position will be ⇒ greater the number of securities held
➃ concentrated positions result from a perceived informational advantage
➄ loss aversion may lead to holding losers that may offer no upside
Adaptive markets hypothesis
– applies principles of evolution to financial markets
(competition, adaptation, natural selection)
- successful participants will adapt to changing markets (greater competition for return) by changing strategies
- success = survival rather than maximizing utility
AMH = EMH + bounded rationality + satisficing + evolutionary principles
- individuals act in their own self-interest, make mistakes, learn and adapt - competition motivates adaptation and innovations
- natural selection and evolution determine market dynamics
Cognitive errors
– biases based on faulty cognitive reasoning
- stem from basic statistical, information-processing or memory errors
- are more easily corrected than emotional biases (better information, education, advice)
Emotional biases
– reasoning influenced by feelings or emotions
- stem from impulse or intuition
- are best adapted to – decisions are made that recognize and adjust for these biases
Belief perseverance biases
- tendency to cling to one’s previously held beliefs irrationally or illogically (conservatism, confirmation, representativeness, illusion of control, hindsight)
- related to cognitive dissonance – new information conflicts with previously held beliefs
How is Belief perseverance basis shown?
➀ Selective exposure – notice only information of interest
➁ Selective perception – ignore or modify info that conflicts with existing
cognitions
➂ Selective retention – remember and consider info that confirms existing cognitions
Conservatism bias
– inadequately incorporating new information
- overweight initial beliefs about probabilities
- under-react to new information
i.e. overweight the base rate (prior probabilities)
∴ may underreact or fail to act on new information and continue to maintain beliefs close to those based on previous estimates & information
- once a position has been taken, people find it very hard to move away from that view
- When movement does occur, it does so only very slowly